Is it possible that $3^n$ starts with $2019$ for some positive integer? [duplicate]Is $2^k = 2013…$ for...

Adventure Game (text based) in C++

Four married couples attend a party. Each person shakes hands with every other person, except their own spouse, exactly once. How many handshakes?

Employee lack of ownership

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

Instead of a Universal Basic Income program, why not implement a "Universal Basic Needs" program?

About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time

What is the purpose or proof behind chain rule?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?

A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?

Encrypting then Base64 Encoding

Why do newer 737s use two different styles of split winglets?

If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?

What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

The meaning of 振り in 無茶振り

Is Manda another name for Saturn (Shani)?

Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?

ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?

When to use a slotted vs. solid turner?

Print a physical multiplication table



Is it possible that $3^n$ starts with $2019$ for some positive integer? [duplicate]


Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$?Is there n such that $3^n$ starts with 2019Starting digits of $2^n$.Combinatorics - Show that $2^n = 1987 dots $Numbers with integer multiples using only digits $2$ and $6$ (Austria Mathematical Olympiad 2006)Prove or disprove that there exists a unique positive integer sequence ${a_{n}}$ satisfying a conditionNumbers $n$ such that there is some digit occuring in each power of $n$Decimal expansion of $kn$ contains only $0,7$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$Unique representations of positive integers?Prove that there exist $n$ consecutive positive integers with the $i$th integer divisible by the $i$th primeIf $n = a^2 + b^2 + c^2$ for positive integers $a$, $b$,$c$, show that there exist positive integers $x$, $y$, $z$ such that $n^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2$.Decimal representation begins with $N$Show that there do not exist any integer $m,n$ such that $frac{m}{n}+frac{n+1}{m}=4$Extremal problem with positive integer numbers













2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]

    1 answer





Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?




My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$
but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Mar 11 at 12:13


















2












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]

    1 answer





Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?




My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$
but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Mar 11 at 12:13
















2












2








2


2



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]

    1 answer





Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?




My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$
but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]

    1 answer





Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?




My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$
but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]

    1 answer








abstract-algebra number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 11 at 15:13









Rócherz

2,9762821




2,9762821










asked Mar 11 at 11:53









CHOUDHARY bhim senCHOUDHARY bhim sen

1589




1589




marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde abstract-algebra
Users with the  abstract-algebra badge can single-handedly close abstract-algebra questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Mar 11 at 12:13
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Mar 11 at 12:13










1




1




$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13






$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$

Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$

A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$

if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.



    Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
      $endgroup$
      – Chrystomath
      Mar 11 at 12:39



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.



    $3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
    for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
    $$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$



    Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
    $$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$



    or equivalently
    $$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
      $$
      2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
      $$

      Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
      log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$

      A positive integer lies in the interval $$
      left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$

      if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        5












        $begingroup$

        You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
        $$
        2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
        $$

        Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
        log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$

        A positive integer lies in the interval $$
        left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$

        if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
          $$
          2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
          $$

          Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
          log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$

          A positive integer lies in the interval $$
          left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$

          if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
          $$
          2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
          $$

          Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
          log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$

          A positive integer lies in the interval $$
          left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$

          if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 11 at 13:27









          Rócherz

          2,9762821




          2,9762821










          answered Mar 11 at 12:05









          Soumik GhoshSoumik Ghosh

          760111




          760111























              3












              $begingroup$

              Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.



              Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
                $endgroup$
                – Chrystomath
                Mar 11 at 12:39
















              3












              $begingroup$

              Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.



              Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
                $endgroup$
                – Chrystomath
                Mar 11 at 12:39














              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.



              Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.



              Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Mar 11 at 11:56









              PeterPeter

              48.8k1139136




              48.8k1139136












              • $begingroup$
                Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
                $endgroup$
                – Chrystomath
                Mar 11 at 12:39


















              • $begingroup$
                Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
                $endgroup$
                – Chrystomath
                Mar 11 at 12:39
















              $begingroup$
              Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
              $endgroup$
              – Chrystomath
              Mar 11 at 12:39




              $begingroup$
              Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
              $endgroup$
              – Chrystomath
              Mar 11 at 12:39











              1












              $begingroup$

              Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.



              $3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
              for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
              $$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$



              Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
              $$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$



              or equivalently
              $$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.



                $3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
                for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
                $$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$



                Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
                $$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$



                or equivalently
                $$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.



                  $3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
                  for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
                  $$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$



                  Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
                  $$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$



                  or equivalently
                  $$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.



                  $3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
                  for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
                  $$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$



                  Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
                  $$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$



                  or equivalently
                  $$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 11 at 12:11









                  mechanodroidmechanodroid

                  28.7k62548




                  28.7k62548















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Nidaros erkebispedøme

                      Birsay

                      Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...