Is it possible that $3^n$ starts with $2019$ for some positive integer? [duplicate]Is $2^k = 2013…$ for...
Adventure Game (text based) in C++
Four married couples attend a party. Each person shakes hands with every other person, except their own spouse, exactly once. How many handshakes?
Employee lack of ownership
Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?
Instead of a Universal Basic Income program, why not implement a "Universal Basic Needs" program?
About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time
What is the purpose or proof behind chain rule?
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
A single argument pattern definition applies to multiple-argument patterns?
Encrypting then Base64 Encoding
Why do newer 737s use two different styles of split winglets?
If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?
What is a ^ b and (a & b) << 1?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
The meaning of 振り in 無茶振り
Is Manda another name for Saturn (Shani)?
Why do tuner card drivers fail to build after kernel update to 4.4.0-143-generic?
ERC721: How to get the owned tokens of an address
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
When to use a slotted vs. solid turner?
Print a physical multiplication table
Is it possible that $3^n$ starts with $2019$ for some positive integer? [duplicate]
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$?Is there n such that $3^n$ starts with 2019Starting digits of $2^n$.Combinatorics - Show that $2^n = 1987 dots $Numbers with integer multiples using only digits $2$ and $6$ (Austria Mathematical Olympiad 2006)Prove or disprove that there exists a unique positive integer sequence ${a_{n}}$ satisfying a conditionNumbers $n$ such that there is some digit occuring in each power of $n$Decimal expansion of $kn$ contains only $0,7$ for some $k in mathbb{N}$Unique representations of positive integers?Prove that there exist $n$ consecutive positive integers with the $i$th integer divisible by the $i$th primeIf $n = a^2 + b^2 + c^2$ for positive integers $a$, $b$,$c$, show that there exist positive integers $x$, $y$, $z$ such that $n^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2$.Decimal representation begins with $N$Show that there do not exist any integer $m,n$ such that $frac{m}{n}+frac{n+1}{m}=4$Extremal problem with positive integer numbers
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]
1 answer
Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?
My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$ but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.
abstract-algebra number-theory
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]
1 answer
Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?
My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$ but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.
abstract-algebra number-theory
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]
1 answer
Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?
My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$ but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.
abstract-algebra number-theory
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]
1 answer
Does there exist a positive integer $n$ such that the decimal representation of $3^n$ starts with $2019$?
My attempt: I have tried some starting powers and I guess no such positive integers exists. Apart from this I have tried binomial expansion $3^n = (1+2)^n = 1
+ {nchoose 1}2 + {n choose 2}2^2 + cdots+ {n choose n }2^n$ but I don't no how to proceed here. Any hint will be helpful.
This question already has an answer here:
Is $2^k = 2013…$ for some $k$? [duplicate]
1 answer
abstract-algebra number-theory
abstract-algebra number-theory
edited Mar 11 at 15:13
Rócherz
2,9762821
2,9762821
asked Mar 11 at 11:53
CHOUDHARY bhim senCHOUDHARY bhim sen
1589
1589
marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Dietrich Burde
StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Mar 11 at 12:21
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
1
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13
1
1
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$
Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$
A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$
if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.
Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.
$3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
$$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$
Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
$$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$
or equivalently
$$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$
Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$
A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$
if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$
Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$
A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$
if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$
Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$
A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$
if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.
$endgroup$
You want positive integers $m$ and $n$ such that
$$
2019 cdot 10^mleq3^n<2020cdot 10^m.
$$
Taking the $log$ each each side gives $$
log(2019)+mleq n log(3)<log(2020)+m \ implies frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}leq n<frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}.$$
A positive integer lies in the interval $$
left(frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)},frac{log(2020)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right)$$
if $$left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}>1-frac{log(2020)-log(2019)}{log(3)}$$ where ${x}=x-[x]$. But since $frac 1{log(3)}$ is irrational the set $left{left{frac{log(2019)}{log(3)}+frac{m}{log(3)}right}:minmathbb Nright}$ is dense in $[0,1)$. Thus such an $n$ indeed exists.
edited Mar 11 at 13:27
Rócherz
2,9762821
2,9762821
answered Mar 11 at 12:05
Soumik GhoshSoumik Ghosh
760111
760111
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.
Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.
Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.
Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$
$endgroup$
Since $$log_{10}(3)cdot n$$ is equidistributed modulo $1$ since $log_{10}(3)$ is irrational, in fact $3^n$ can start with every given finite digit string with first digit non-zero.
Brute force reveals that $3^{686}$ is the smallest power of $3$ starting with $2019$
answered Mar 11 at 11:56
PeterPeter
48.8k1139136
48.8k1139136
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
$begingroup$
Since $n|log3-frac{m}{n}|<log(2020/2019)approx0.0005$, you can narrow the search by finding continued fraction approximations that give this amount of accuracy. In this case $log3approxfrac{713}{649}pm0.0006$ gives 649 as a good starting point for the search.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 11 at 12:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.
$3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
$$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$
Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
$$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$
or equivalently
$$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.
$3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
$$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$
Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
$$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$
or equivalently
$$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.
$3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
$$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$
Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
$$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$
or equivalently
$$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$
$endgroup$
Yes, in fact there are infinitely many $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $3^n$ starts with $2019$.
$3^n$ starts with $2019$ if and only if $$2019 cdot 10^m le 3^n < 2020 cdot 10^m$$
for some $m in mathbb{N}_0$. This is equivalent to
$$m + log_{10} 2019 le nlog_{10}3 < m + log_{10}2020$$
Now, since $log_{10}3$ is irrational, the set $${nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor : n inmathbb{N}}$$ is dense in $[0,1]$ so there exists infinitely many $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
$$nlog_{10}3 - lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor in [log_{10}2019 - 3, log_{10}2020 - 3) subseteq [0,1]$$
or equivalently
$$(lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2019 le nlog_{10}3 < (lfloor nlog_{10}3rfloor-3) + log_{10}2020 $$
answered Mar 11 at 12:11
mechanodroidmechanodroid
28.7k62548
28.7k62548
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is an old question, see here, or here, or here etc.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Mar 11 at 12:13