Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on the pie wedge?The form of the...

Why would the IRS ask for birth certificates or even audit a small tax return?

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?

Why is the electrolytic capacitor not polarity sensitive?

Deal the cards to the players

How do we objectively assess if a dialogue sounds unnatural or cringy?

Iron deposits mined from under the city

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Rationale to prefer local variables over instance variables?

Gemara word for QED

The (Easy) Road to Code

Are Wave equations equivalent to Maxwell equations in free space?

Can you run a ground wire from stove directly to ground pole in the ground

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Why won't the strings command stop?

Why is there an extra space when I type "ls" on the Desktop?

Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?

Does the in-code argument passing conventions used on PDP-11's have a name?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

I can't die. Who am I?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

Custom javascript not working

How do you make a gun that shoots melee weapons and/or swords?

Learning to quickly identify valid fingering for piano?



Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on the pie wedge?


The form of the Poisson Integral Formula for a Temperature ProfileEquilibrium solution using polar coordinatesReducing the Laplace equation with inhomogeneous BC's to the Poisson equation with homogeneous BC'sHow to numerically solve the Poisson equation given Neumann boundary conditions?Representation formula for the Laplace equationSolve the Laplace equation on an annular regionUniqueness of the Homogeneous Neumann BC Laplace EquationUsing Poisson kernel to solve heat equationUse of the Poisson Kernel to solve Inhomogeneous Laplace EquationUse principle of minimum maximum for the equation of Laplace













0












$begingroup$


We know Poisson Integral Formula can solve the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the unit disk. But for such a problem as below:




Find the solution to the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the pie wedge $displaystyle W=left{0<theta<frac{pi}{4}, quad 0<r<1right}$, when the nonzero boundary data $u(1, theta)=h(theta)$ appears only on the curved portion of its boundary.




Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on this pie wedge? I mean, it seems that the solution shouldn't change when we use a sub-region of the original problem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    17 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$


We know Poisson Integral Formula can solve the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the unit disk. But for such a problem as below:




Find the solution to the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the pie wedge $displaystyle W=left{0<theta<frac{pi}{4}, quad 0<r<1right}$, when the nonzero boundary data $u(1, theta)=h(theta)$ appears only on the curved portion of its boundary.




Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on this pie wedge? I mean, it seems that the solution shouldn't change when we use a sub-region of the original problem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    17 hours ago
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


We know Poisson Integral Formula can solve the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the unit disk. But for such a problem as below:




Find the solution to the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the pie wedge $displaystyle W=left{0<theta<frac{pi}{4}, quad 0<r<1right}$, when the nonzero boundary data $u(1, theta)=h(theta)$ appears only on the curved portion of its boundary.




Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on this pie wedge? I mean, it seems that the solution shouldn't change when we use a sub-region of the original problem.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




We know Poisson Integral Formula can solve the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the unit disk. But for such a problem as below:




Find the solution to the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplace equation on the pie wedge $displaystyle W=left{0<theta<frac{pi}{4}, quad 0<r<1right}$, when the nonzero boundary data $u(1, theta)=h(theta)$ appears only on the curved portion of its boundary.




Why can't we use Poisson Integral Formula to solve the Laplace equation on this pie wedge? I mean, it seems that the solution shouldn't change when we use a sub-region of the original problem.







pde






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 17 hours ago









Dylan

13.6k31027




13.6k31027






New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









ThinkpadThinkpad

61




61




New contributor




Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Thinkpad is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    17 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
    $endgroup$
    – Dylan
    17 hours ago


















$begingroup$
You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
17 hours ago






$begingroup$
You can if there is a Poisson kernal for this domain. Can you find it?
$endgroup$
– Dylan
17 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The Poisson integral formula is a particular case of Green's representation formula, which uses the Green function of a region (and/or its derivative) to represent the solution to Dirichlet/Neumann problems. Green's function is the solution of your problem with a delta-type source at some generic point in your domain and homogeneous Dirichlet data on the boundary. It depends critically on the shape of the boundary (think of the electrostatic potential created by a unit charge when you impose that certain curve (namely the boundary of your domain) is an equipotential line or surface). Thus, you get a different Poisson kernel for the upper half-plane and for the disk. In one case the $x$ axis is a zero-potential line, in the other one the unit circle is a zero-potential line, etc. In physical terms, you have different distributions of the induced charges on the boundary.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Thinkpad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138522%2fwhy-cant-we-use-poisson-integral-formula-to-solve-the-laplace-equation-on-the-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    The Poisson integral formula is a particular case of Green's representation formula, which uses the Green function of a region (and/or its derivative) to represent the solution to Dirichlet/Neumann problems. Green's function is the solution of your problem with a delta-type source at some generic point in your domain and homogeneous Dirichlet data on the boundary. It depends critically on the shape of the boundary (think of the electrostatic potential created by a unit charge when you impose that certain curve (namely the boundary of your domain) is an equipotential line or surface). Thus, you get a different Poisson kernel for the upper half-plane and for the disk. In one case the $x$ axis is a zero-potential line, in the other one the unit circle is a zero-potential line, etc. In physical terms, you have different distributions of the induced charges on the boundary.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The Poisson integral formula is a particular case of Green's representation formula, which uses the Green function of a region (and/or its derivative) to represent the solution to Dirichlet/Neumann problems. Green's function is the solution of your problem with a delta-type source at some generic point in your domain and homogeneous Dirichlet data on the boundary. It depends critically on the shape of the boundary (think of the electrostatic potential created by a unit charge when you impose that certain curve (namely the boundary of your domain) is an equipotential line or surface). Thus, you get a different Poisson kernel for the upper half-plane and for the disk. In one case the $x$ axis is a zero-potential line, in the other one the unit circle is a zero-potential line, etc. In physical terms, you have different distributions of the induced charges on the boundary.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The Poisson integral formula is a particular case of Green's representation formula, which uses the Green function of a region (and/or its derivative) to represent the solution to Dirichlet/Neumann problems. Green's function is the solution of your problem with a delta-type source at some generic point in your domain and homogeneous Dirichlet data on the boundary. It depends critically on the shape of the boundary (think of the electrostatic potential created by a unit charge when you impose that certain curve (namely the boundary of your domain) is an equipotential line or surface). Thus, you get a different Poisson kernel for the upper half-plane and for the disk. In one case the $x$ axis is a zero-potential line, in the other one the unit circle is a zero-potential line, etc. In physical terms, you have different distributions of the induced charges on the boundary.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The Poisson integral formula is a particular case of Green's representation formula, which uses the Green function of a region (and/or its derivative) to represent the solution to Dirichlet/Neumann problems. Green's function is the solution of your problem with a delta-type source at some generic point in your domain and homogeneous Dirichlet data on the boundary. It depends critically on the shape of the boundary (think of the electrostatic potential created by a unit charge when you impose that certain curve (namely the boundary of your domain) is an equipotential line or surface). Thus, you get a different Poisson kernel for the upper half-plane and for the disk. In one case the $x$ axis is a zero-potential line, in the other one the unit circle is a zero-potential line, etc. In physical terms, you have different distributions of the induced charges on the boundary.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 23 hours ago









        GReyesGReyes

        1,77515




        1,77515






















            Thinkpad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Thinkpad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Thinkpad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Thinkpad is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138522%2fwhy-cant-we-use-poisson-integral-formula-to-solve-the-laplace-equation-on-the-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Where did Arya get these scars? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why did Arya refuse to end it?Has the pronunciation of Arya Stark's name changed?Has Arya forgiven people?Why did Arya Stark lose her vision?Why can Arya still use the faces?Has the Narrow Sea become narrower?Does Arya Stark know how to make poisons outside of the House of Black and White?Why did Nymeria leave Arya?Why did Arya not kill the Lannister soldiers she encountered in the Riverlands?What is the current canonical age of Sansa, Bran and Arya Stark?