Matrix product and eigen values Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar...
Besides transaction validation, are there any other uses of the Script language in Bitcoin
Why are current probes so expensive?
Russian equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)
Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c
Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?
Problem with display of presentation
What are some likely causes to domain member PC losing contact to domain controller?
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
How do I find my Spellcasting Ability for my D&D character?
Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?
Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?
Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?
Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
Is it OK to use the testing sample to compare algorithms?
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?
Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?
An isoperimetric-type inequality inside a cube
NIntegrate on a solution of a matrix ODE
Table formatting with tabularx?
Plotting a Maclaurin series
Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?
How do you write "wild blueberries flavored"?
Matrix product and eigen values
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Eigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixEigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixRelation between trace and Ky Fan normsymmetric normalized Graph Laplacian and symmetric normalized Adjacency matrix eigenvaluesWeighted undirected graphs, complex Laplacian, complex eigenvalues & spectral cluseringWhat is the multiplicity of the largest eigenvalue of a graph?What's the relationship between the rank and eigenvalues of symmetric positive semidefinite matrix (real domain)?Laplacian spectrum of directed network (digraph) and its complementMaximizing the smallest positive eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix via SDPIs the off-diagonal part of a covariance matrix, $M = Sigma -operatorname{ diag}(Sigma)$ studied?Why are we interested in finding the spectrum of products of graphs?
$begingroup$
Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?
My problem at hand is as follows :
Let A=L*B.
What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?
L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.
I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.
matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian
$endgroup$
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?
My problem at hand is as follows :
Let A=L*B.
What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?
L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.
I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.
matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?
My problem at hand is as follows :
Let A=L*B.
What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?
L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.
I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.
matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian
$endgroup$
Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?
My problem at hand is as follows :
Let A=L*B.
What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?
L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.
I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.
matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian
matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian
asked Mar 26 at 10:37
Abhiram V PAbhiram V P
166
166
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44
|
show 7 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163012%2fmatrix-product-and-eigen-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163012%2fmatrix-product-and-eigen-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = begin{bmatrix}0&0\0&0end{bmatrix} qquad L_2 = begin{bmatrix}1&-1\-1&1end{bmatrix} qquad B=begin{bmatrix}-1 &0 \ 0 & 1end{bmatrix}$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17
$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41
$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44