Exempt portion of equation line from aligning?The mysteries of mathpaletteAligning plain `align` and...
Latex does not go to next line
What is the magic ball of every day?
Can you reject a postdoc offer after the PI has paid a large sum for flights/accommodation for your visit?
Is "conspicuously missing" or "conspicuously" the subject of this sentence?
What does "the touch of the purple" mean?
Is it "Vierergruppe" or "Viergruppe", or is there a distinction?
How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?
Does a warlock using the Darkness/Devil's Sight combo still have advantage on ranged attacks against a target outside the Darkness?
Counting all the hearts
PTIJ: Should I kill my computer after installing software?
Motivation for Zeta Function of an Algebraic Variety
Why does liquid water form when we exhale on a mirror?
Are babies of evil humanoid species inherently evil?
Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?
Definition of Statistic
An alternative proof of an application of Hahn-Banach
Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call
Why is computing ridge regression with a Cholesky decomposition much quicker than using SVD?
weren't playing vs didn't play
Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?
Single word request: Harming the benefactor
Declaring and defining template, and specialising them
Conservation of Mass and Energy
How can I get players to stop ignoring or overlooking the plot hooks I'm giving them?
Exempt portion of equation line from aligning?
The mysteries of mathpaletteAligning plain `align` and `cases`?Alignment across nested aligned environmentsHow to match left alignment of equations in math mode outside and inside an array?How to modify eqnarray?Alignment of two equations on LaTeXHow center align two equations separated by a lineequation custom horizontal alignment & numbering each rowFlushed-left and flushed-right text in align or alignat environmentHow can I align this equation in the center?breqn not aligning first two lines
I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:
usepackage{array,amsmath}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}
]

The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.
Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.
My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.
...
begin{align*}
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
end{align*}

How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.
math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:
usepackage{array,amsmath}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}
]

The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.
Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.
My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.
...
begin{align*}
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
end{align*}

How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.
math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:
usepackage{array,amsmath}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}
]

The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.
Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.
My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.
...
begin{align*}
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
end{align*}

How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.
math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:
usepackage{array,amsmath}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}
]

The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.
Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.
My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.
...
begin{align*}
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
end{align*}

How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.
math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays
math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
PGmathPGmath
1362
1362
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:

documentclass{article}
usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
makeatletter
NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
IfValueTF{#1}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
}
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
&= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.
add a comment |
try
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
& multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
}
end{array}
]
end{document}

add a comment |
Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}\
&=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
end{align*}
end{document}

I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what[t]does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
add a comment |
I would take a different different approach to displaying the material and showing which parts are equal to what: I'd use three underbrace directives. I'd also use an align* environment.

documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&= {underbrace{binom{n+1}{0}}_{displaystyle 1}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{1} + dots + binom{n+1}{n}}_{%
displaystyle sum_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r}}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{n+1}}_{displaystyle 1}} \
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^n biggl[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478527%2fexempt-portion-of-equation-line-from-aligning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:

documentclass{article}
usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
makeatletter
NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
IfValueTF{#1}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
}
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
&= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.
add a comment |
eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:

documentclass{article}
usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
makeatletter
NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
IfValueTF{#1}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
}
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
&= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.
add a comment |
eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:

documentclass{article}
usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
makeatletter
NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
IfValueTF{#1}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
}
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
&= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.
eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:

documentclass{article}
usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
makeatletter
NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
IfValueTF{#1}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
{defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
}
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
&= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
&= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
WernerWerner
447k699891695
447k699891695
add a comment |
add a comment |
try
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
& multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
}
end{array}
]
end{document}

add a comment |
try
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
& multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
}
end{array}
]
end{document}

add a comment |
try
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
& multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
}
end{array}
]
end{document}

try
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
& multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
}
end{array}
]
end{document}

answered 2 days ago
ZarkoZarko
127k868166
127k868166
add a comment |
add a comment |
Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}\
&=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
end{align*}
end{document}

I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what[t]does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
add a comment |
Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}\
&=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
end{align*}
end{document}

I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what[t]does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
add a comment |
Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}\
&=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
end{align*}
end{document}

Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{array,amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
& binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}\
&=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
end{align*}
end{document}

edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
marmotmarmot
107k5130244
107k5130244
I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what[t]does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
add a comment |
I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what[t]does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.
– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
@PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.
– marmot
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what
[t] does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.– PGmath
2 days ago
Thanks. Can you explain a little what
[t] does? I've never done much involved stuff with arrays before.– PGmath
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
@PGmath It aligns the array at the top.
– marmot
2 days ago
add a comment |
I would take a different different approach to displaying the material and showing which parts are equal to what: I'd use three underbrace directives. I'd also use an align* environment.

documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&= {underbrace{binom{n+1}{0}}_{displaystyle 1}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{1} + dots + binom{n+1}{n}}_{%
displaystyle sum_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r}}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{n+1}}_{displaystyle 1}} \
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^n biggl[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
I would take a different different approach to displaying the material and showing which parts are equal to what: I'd use three underbrace directives. I'd also use an align* environment.

documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&= {underbrace{binom{n+1}{0}}_{displaystyle 1}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{1} + dots + binom{n+1}{n}}_{%
displaystyle sum_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r}}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{n+1}}_{displaystyle 1}} \
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^n biggl[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
add a comment |
I would take a different different approach to displaying the material and showing which parts are equal to what: I'd use three underbrace directives. I'd also use an align* environment.

documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&= {underbrace{binom{n+1}{0}}_{displaystyle 1}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{1} + dots + binom{n+1}{n}}_{%
displaystyle sum_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r}}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{n+1}}_{displaystyle 1}} \
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^n biggl[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
I would take a different different approach to displaying the material and showing which parts are equal to what: I'd use three underbrace directives. I'd also use an align* environment.

documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align*}
sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
&= {underbrace{binom{n+1}{0}}_{displaystyle 1}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{1} + dots + binom{n+1}{n}}_{%
displaystyle sum_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r}}}
+ {underbrace{binom{n+1}{n+1}}_{displaystyle 1}} \
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^n biggl[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}biggr]
end{align*}
end{document}
answered 2 days ago
MicoMico
282k31386774
282k31386774
add a comment |
add a comment |
PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478527%2fexempt-portion-of-equation-line-from-aligning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown