Show the non-zero vectors $v_1,v_2,⋯,v_n$ are linearly independent if $(A−λI)^{j+1}v_j=0$, where...

Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call

How strictly should I take "Candidates must be local"?

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

Does "Until when" sound natural for native speakers?

Does this video of collapsing warehouse shelves show a real incident?

If I receive an SOS signal, what is the proper response?

What was the Kree's motivation in Captain Marvel?

Signed and unsigned numbers

Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?

Does a warlock using the Darkness/Devil's Sight combo still have advantage on ranged attacks against a target outside the Darkness?

Error during using callback start_page_number in lualatex

Difference on montgomery curve equation between EFD and RFC7748

In the quantum hamiltonian, why does kinetic energy turn into an operator while potential doesn't?

What's the "normal" opposite of flautando?

How to detect if C code (which needs 'extern C') is compiled in C++

Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?

meaning and function of 幸 in "则幸分我一杯羹"

How can I get players to stop ignoring or overlooking the plot hooks I'm giving them?

Reversed Sudoku

Is "conspicuously missing" or "conspicuously" the subject of this sentence?

Definition of Statistic

How to fix the Unknown Command error caused by starting CmdInit.cmd using TCC/LE?

How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?



Show the non-zero vectors $v_1,v_2,⋯,v_n$ are linearly independent if $(A−λI)^{j+1}v_j=0$, where $j=0,1,⋯,n$.


A question about linear independenceUnique linear combination problemIs $span(v_1, . . . ,v_m)$ a linearly dependent or linearly independent set of vectors? Also, what will happen if we take span of span?Showing Linear dependencyHow to prove that {$v_1,v_2$} are linearly independent if $Sp{v_1,v_2}=Sp{w_1,w_2}$ and {$v_1,w_2$} are linearly independent?linear-Independency is retained over a linear MapShow that if Span${v_1,v_2,v_3}$=$mathbb{R}^3$ then ${v_1,v_2,v_3}$ is linearly independent.Let ${v_1,v_2,ldots,v_n}$ a linear independent set of vectors, and let $w inlangle v_1,v_2,ldots,v_nrangle$, prove linear independenceThe length of every linearly independent list of vectors is less than or equal to the length of every spanning list of vectors.Proof of $j=1$ where $v_j in span(v_1, …,v_{j-1})$













1












$begingroup$


My attempt at a solution uses the linear dependence lemma. Assume on the contrary that the list of vectors is linearly dependent. Then it is possible to find some $v_j$ that can be written as a linear combination of the remaining vectors: that is,
$$v_j = a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n.$$ Applying the operator $(A - lambda I)^{j+1}$ to both sides, we have
$$ 0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1}) + (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$ The first sum is zero, since the vectors there require the operator $A - lambda I$ applied at most $j$ times to be $0$. Hence, $$0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$
And this is where I'm stuck. How do I use this to show a contradiction and conclude they are linearly independent?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    2 days ago


















1












$begingroup$


My attempt at a solution uses the linear dependence lemma. Assume on the contrary that the list of vectors is linearly dependent. Then it is possible to find some $v_j$ that can be written as a linear combination of the remaining vectors: that is,
$$v_j = a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n.$$ Applying the operator $(A - lambda I)^{j+1}$ to both sides, we have
$$ 0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1}) + (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$ The first sum is zero, since the vectors there require the operator $A - lambda I$ applied at most $j$ times to be $0$. Hence, $$0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$
And this is where I'm stuck. How do I use this to show a contradiction and conclude they are linearly independent?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    2 days ago
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


My attempt at a solution uses the linear dependence lemma. Assume on the contrary that the list of vectors is linearly dependent. Then it is possible to find some $v_j$ that can be written as a linear combination of the remaining vectors: that is,
$$v_j = a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n.$$ Applying the operator $(A - lambda I)^{j+1}$ to both sides, we have
$$ 0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1}) + (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$ The first sum is zero, since the vectors there require the operator $A - lambda I$ applied at most $j$ times to be $0$. Hence, $$0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$
And this is where I'm stuck. How do I use this to show a contradiction and conclude they are linearly independent?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




My attempt at a solution uses the linear dependence lemma. Assume on the contrary that the list of vectors is linearly dependent. Then it is possible to find some $v_j$ that can be written as a linear combination of the remaining vectors: that is,
$$v_j = a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n.$$ Applying the operator $(A - lambda I)^{j+1}$ to both sides, we have
$$ 0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_1v_1 + a_2v_2 + cdots + a_{j-1}v_{j-1}) + (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$ The first sum is zero, since the vectors there require the operator $A - lambda I$ applied at most $j$ times to be $0$. Hence, $$0 = (A - lambda I)^{j+1}(a_{j-1}v_{j-1} + a_{j+1}v_{j+1} + cdots + a_nv_n).$$
And this is where I'm stuck. How do I use this to show a contradiction and conclude they are linearly independent?







linear-algebra vector-spaces vectors






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Yejus













New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









YejusYejus

62




62




New contributor




Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Yejus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    $v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    2 days ago




















  • $begingroup$
    $v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
    2 days ago


















$begingroup$
$v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago




$begingroup$
$v_j=0$ is an obvious counterexample.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Possibly the additional condition $(A−λI)^{j}v_jnot=0$ has to be imposed.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
2 days ago












$begingroup$
I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
$endgroup$
– Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
2 days ago






$begingroup$
I imagine that what you mean is that: $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0.$$
$endgroup$
– Yiorgos S. Smyrlis
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I use the assumption that
$$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0,$$
otherwise it is not true. For example
$$
lambda=0, quad
A=left(begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\ 0 & 0end{array}right), quad v_j=binom{0}{1}, quad jinmathbb N.
$$

In order to prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are linearly independent, it suffices to show that, for all $k$, the vector $v_k$ can not be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1,ldots,v_{k-1}$.



Clearly, for $k=1$, this holds, since $(A-lambda)v_1ne 0$, and hence $v_1ne 0$.



Assume that
$v_k=c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}$. Then
$$
0ne (A-lambda I)^kv_k
=(A-lambda I)^kbig(c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}big)=0
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Yejus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140767%2fshow-the-non-zero-vectors-v-1-v-2-%25e2%258b%25af-v-n-are-linearly-independent-if-a%25e2%2588%2592%25ce%25bbij%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    I use the assumption that
    $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0,$$
    otherwise it is not true. For example
    $$
    lambda=0, quad
    A=left(begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\ 0 & 0end{array}right), quad v_j=binom{0}{1}, quad jinmathbb N.
    $$

    In order to prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are linearly independent, it suffices to show that, for all $k$, the vector $v_k$ can not be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1,ldots,v_{k-1}$.



    Clearly, for $k=1$, this holds, since $(A-lambda)v_1ne 0$, and hence $v_1ne 0$.



    Assume that
    $v_k=c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}$. Then
    $$
    0ne (A-lambda I)^kv_k
    =(A-lambda I)^kbig(c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}big)=0
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      I use the assumption that
      $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0,$$
      otherwise it is not true. For example
      $$
      lambda=0, quad
      A=left(begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\ 0 & 0end{array}right), quad v_j=binom{0}{1}, quad jinmathbb N.
      $$

      In order to prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are linearly independent, it suffices to show that, for all $k$, the vector $v_k$ can not be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1,ldots,v_{k-1}$.



      Clearly, for $k=1$, this holds, since $(A-lambda)v_1ne 0$, and hence $v_1ne 0$.



      Assume that
      $v_k=c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}$. Then
      $$
      0ne (A-lambda I)^kv_k
      =(A-lambda I)^kbig(c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}big)=0
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        I use the assumption that
        $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0,$$
        otherwise it is not true. For example
        $$
        lambda=0, quad
        A=left(begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\ 0 & 0end{array}right), quad v_j=binom{0}{1}, quad jinmathbb N.
        $$

        In order to prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are linearly independent, it suffices to show that, for all $k$, the vector $v_k$ can not be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1,ldots,v_{k-1}$.



        Clearly, for $k=1$, this holds, since $(A-lambda)v_1ne 0$, and hence $v_1ne 0$.



        Assume that
        $v_k=c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}$. Then
        $$
        0ne (A-lambda I)^kv_k
        =(A-lambda I)^kbig(c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}big)=0
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I use the assumption that
        $$ (A-lambda I)^jv_jne 0quadtext{and}quad (A-lambda I)^{j+1}v_j=0,$$
        otherwise it is not true. For example
        $$
        lambda=0, quad
        A=left(begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1\ 0 & 0end{array}right), quad v_j=binom{0}{1}, quad jinmathbb N.
        $$

        In order to prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are linearly independent, it suffices to show that, for all $k$, the vector $v_k$ can not be expressed as a linear combination of $v_1,ldots,v_{k-1}$.



        Clearly, for $k=1$, this holds, since $(A-lambda)v_1ne 0$, and hence $v_1ne 0$.



        Assume that
        $v_k=c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}$. Then
        $$
        0ne (A-lambda I)^kv_k
        =(A-lambda I)^kbig(c_1v_1+cdots+c_{k-1}v_{k-1}big)=0
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Yiorgos S. SmyrlisYiorgos S. Smyrlis

        63.4k1385164




        63.4k1385164






















            Yejus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Yejus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Yejus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Yejus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3140767%2fshow-the-non-zero-vectors-v-1-v-2-%25e2%258b%25af-v-n-are-linearly-independent-if-a%25e2%2588%2592%25ce%25bbij%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            六本木駅

            Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

            Joseph Lister