What do these Greek words say? Possibly 2nd centuryHow do you translate these verbal adjectives? (Greek)What...
How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?
Stereotypical names
Perfect riffle shuffles
Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold
Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image
Does "Dominei" mean something?
The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?
Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits
Simple recursive Sudoku solver
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Partial sums of primes
Is there enough fresh water in the world to eradicate the drinking water crisis?
Superhero words!
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?
A known event to a history junkie
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)
For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?
Is a naturally all "male" species possible?
Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)
Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Bob has never been a M before
Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?
What do these Greek words say? Possibly 2nd century
How do you translate these verbal adjectives? (Greek)What is this participle λέγοντες doing? (Greek)The three maxims at the Temple of Apollo (Greek)Could the u in e.g. aufero be related to the u in Mycenaean a-pu-do-ke?Translation of Greek “ἅπτω” in John 20:17What construction is used with φάθι εἶναι? (Plat. Rep. 6.508e)Translating “Pigasus” into GreekWhat is the earliest known word borrowed from Latin to Greek?What is up with these codices?Hesychius quote: where are those words from?
Here is a very old (possibly 2nd century) depiction of the Crucifixion of Jesus on an engraved gem:

What do the words say?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_in_the_arts#Late_Antiquity
greek greek-translation
add a comment |
Here is a very old (possibly 2nd century) depiction of the Crucifixion of Jesus on an engraved gem:

What do the words say?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_in_the_arts#Late_Antiquity
greek greek-translation
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32
add a comment |
Here is a very old (possibly 2nd century) depiction of the Crucifixion of Jesus on an engraved gem:

What do the words say?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_in_the_arts#Late_Antiquity
greek greek-translation
Here is a very old (possibly 2nd century) depiction of the Crucifixion of Jesus on an engraved gem:

What do the words say?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion_in_the_arts#Late_Antiquity
greek greek-translation
greek greek-translation
asked Mar 14 at 16:10
Sacha T RedSacha T Red
1461
1461
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32
add a comment |
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The words are Greek:
ΟΡΦΕΟϹ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟϹ
Orpheos Baccicos
My guess is that it was meant to be Orpheus Bacchicos, either misspelled or written in a different dialect. In this case, it would mean "Bacchic Orpheus" (where "Bacchic" refers to the worship of Bacchus, and "Orpheus" is the singer who went down to the Underworld and returned).
Both Bacchus and Orpheus had cults relating to death and resurrection, and they were sometimes unified into a single deity called "Zagreus", so I wouldn't be too surprised to see their names associated with the Christian idea of the Resurrection.
add a comment |
According to this site, it has the image of
a crucified man identified as ΟΡΦΕΩΣ ΒΑΚΧΙΚΟΣ (Orpheos Bacchikos).
A dedicated scientific article analysing the stone (in relation to, for instance, the Crucifixion of Jesus) can be found here. Notice that it is unclear if the image is that of Jesus. Orpheos might be a reference to the Greek legendary figure of that name. For instance, the article states:
The fact
that Christ appears represented on a cross, but is designated OPΦEOC BAKKIKOC—“Bacchic
Orpheus”—, is of remarkable singularity in religious history, because Christ has taken the
place of Orpheus, and not vice versa, as it is well-known from catacomb frescoes, for
example with Orpheus as the Good Shepherd. Therefore the artefact would be
syncretistic or Orphic, however with an Orpheus subjected to Dionysian suffering like Marsyas at the stake, and not like the Apollonian Orpheus with his lyra amidst tamed beasts. Bakkikos as an epithet of Orpheos is not tautologic, because beside the tradition that (as it seems to be the case here) Orpheus was killed by the enemies of his own following, there was among many others one famous variant, in which Orpheus, after returning from the Hades, abandoned his earlier habit of worshipping Dionysus-Bacchus and turned to Helios-Apollo instead, for which the insulted god had him dismembered by his Maenads. Therefore the designation Bakkikos would contrast this Orpheus on the
cross from the follower of Apollo and identify him as the founder of the Dionysian
Mysteries (see below).
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9284%2fwhat-do-these-greek-words-say-possibly-2nd-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The words are Greek:
ΟΡΦΕΟϹ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟϹ
Orpheos Baccicos
My guess is that it was meant to be Orpheus Bacchicos, either misspelled or written in a different dialect. In this case, it would mean "Bacchic Orpheus" (where "Bacchic" refers to the worship of Bacchus, and "Orpheus" is the singer who went down to the Underworld and returned).
Both Bacchus and Orpheus had cults relating to death and resurrection, and they were sometimes unified into a single deity called "Zagreus", so I wouldn't be too surprised to see their names associated with the Christian idea of the Resurrection.
add a comment |
The words are Greek:
ΟΡΦΕΟϹ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟϹ
Orpheos Baccicos
My guess is that it was meant to be Orpheus Bacchicos, either misspelled or written in a different dialect. In this case, it would mean "Bacchic Orpheus" (where "Bacchic" refers to the worship of Bacchus, and "Orpheus" is the singer who went down to the Underworld and returned).
Both Bacchus and Orpheus had cults relating to death and resurrection, and they were sometimes unified into a single deity called "Zagreus", so I wouldn't be too surprised to see their names associated with the Christian idea of the Resurrection.
add a comment |
The words are Greek:
ΟΡΦΕΟϹ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟϹ
Orpheos Baccicos
My guess is that it was meant to be Orpheus Bacchicos, either misspelled or written in a different dialect. In this case, it would mean "Bacchic Orpheus" (where "Bacchic" refers to the worship of Bacchus, and "Orpheus" is the singer who went down to the Underworld and returned).
Both Bacchus and Orpheus had cults relating to death and resurrection, and they were sometimes unified into a single deity called "Zagreus", so I wouldn't be too surprised to see their names associated with the Christian idea of the Resurrection.
The words are Greek:
ΟΡΦΕΟϹ ΒΑΚΚΙΚΟϹ
Orpheos Baccicos
My guess is that it was meant to be Orpheus Bacchicos, either misspelled or written in a different dialect. In this case, it would mean "Bacchic Orpheus" (where "Bacchic" refers to the worship of Bacchus, and "Orpheus" is the singer who went down to the Underworld and returned).
Both Bacchus and Orpheus had cults relating to death and resurrection, and they were sometimes unified into a single deity called "Zagreus", so I wouldn't be too surprised to see their names associated with the Christian idea of the Resurrection.
answered Mar 14 at 16:29
DraconisDraconis
17.6k22373
17.6k22373
add a comment |
add a comment |
According to this site, it has the image of
a crucified man identified as ΟΡΦΕΩΣ ΒΑΚΧΙΚΟΣ (Orpheos Bacchikos).
A dedicated scientific article analysing the stone (in relation to, for instance, the Crucifixion of Jesus) can be found here. Notice that it is unclear if the image is that of Jesus. Orpheos might be a reference to the Greek legendary figure of that name. For instance, the article states:
The fact
that Christ appears represented on a cross, but is designated OPΦEOC BAKKIKOC—“Bacchic
Orpheus”—, is of remarkable singularity in religious history, because Christ has taken the
place of Orpheus, and not vice versa, as it is well-known from catacomb frescoes, for
example with Orpheus as the Good Shepherd. Therefore the artefact would be
syncretistic or Orphic, however with an Orpheus subjected to Dionysian suffering like Marsyas at the stake, and not like the Apollonian Orpheus with his lyra amidst tamed beasts. Bakkikos as an epithet of Orpheos is not tautologic, because beside the tradition that (as it seems to be the case here) Orpheus was killed by the enemies of his own following, there was among many others one famous variant, in which Orpheus, after returning from the Hades, abandoned his earlier habit of worshipping Dionysus-Bacchus and turned to Helios-Apollo instead, for which the insulted god had him dismembered by his Maenads. Therefore the designation Bakkikos would contrast this Orpheus on the
cross from the follower of Apollo and identify him as the founder of the Dionysian
Mysteries (see below).
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
|
show 1 more comment
According to this site, it has the image of
a crucified man identified as ΟΡΦΕΩΣ ΒΑΚΧΙΚΟΣ (Orpheos Bacchikos).
A dedicated scientific article analysing the stone (in relation to, for instance, the Crucifixion of Jesus) can be found here. Notice that it is unclear if the image is that of Jesus. Orpheos might be a reference to the Greek legendary figure of that name. For instance, the article states:
The fact
that Christ appears represented on a cross, but is designated OPΦEOC BAKKIKOC—“Bacchic
Orpheus”—, is of remarkable singularity in religious history, because Christ has taken the
place of Orpheus, and not vice versa, as it is well-known from catacomb frescoes, for
example with Orpheus as the Good Shepherd. Therefore the artefact would be
syncretistic or Orphic, however with an Orpheus subjected to Dionysian suffering like Marsyas at the stake, and not like the Apollonian Orpheus with his lyra amidst tamed beasts. Bakkikos as an epithet of Orpheos is not tautologic, because beside the tradition that (as it seems to be the case here) Orpheus was killed by the enemies of his own following, there was among many others one famous variant, in which Orpheus, after returning from the Hades, abandoned his earlier habit of worshipping Dionysus-Bacchus and turned to Helios-Apollo instead, for which the insulted god had him dismembered by his Maenads. Therefore the designation Bakkikos would contrast this Orpheus on the
cross from the follower of Apollo and identify him as the founder of the Dionysian
Mysteries (see below).
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
|
show 1 more comment
According to this site, it has the image of
a crucified man identified as ΟΡΦΕΩΣ ΒΑΚΧΙΚΟΣ (Orpheos Bacchikos).
A dedicated scientific article analysing the stone (in relation to, for instance, the Crucifixion of Jesus) can be found here. Notice that it is unclear if the image is that of Jesus. Orpheos might be a reference to the Greek legendary figure of that name. For instance, the article states:
The fact
that Christ appears represented on a cross, but is designated OPΦEOC BAKKIKOC—“Bacchic
Orpheus”—, is of remarkable singularity in religious history, because Christ has taken the
place of Orpheus, and not vice versa, as it is well-known from catacomb frescoes, for
example with Orpheus as the Good Shepherd. Therefore the artefact would be
syncretistic or Orphic, however with an Orpheus subjected to Dionysian suffering like Marsyas at the stake, and not like the Apollonian Orpheus with his lyra amidst tamed beasts. Bakkikos as an epithet of Orpheos is not tautologic, because beside the tradition that (as it seems to be the case here) Orpheus was killed by the enemies of his own following, there was among many others one famous variant, in which Orpheus, after returning from the Hades, abandoned his earlier habit of worshipping Dionysus-Bacchus and turned to Helios-Apollo instead, for which the insulted god had him dismembered by his Maenads. Therefore the designation Bakkikos would contrast this Orpheus on the
cross from the follower of Apollo and identify him as the founder of the Dionysian
Mysteries (see below).
According to this site, it has the image of
a crucified man identified as ΟΡΦΕΩΣ ΒΑΚΧΙΚΟΣ (Orpheos Bacchikos).
A dedicated scientific article analysing the stone (in relation to, for instance, the Crucifixion of Jesus) can be found here. Notice that it is unclear if the image is that of Jesus. Orpheos might be a reference to the Greek legendary figure of that name. For instance, the article states:
The fact
that Christ appears represented on a cross, but is designated OPΦEOC BAKKIKOC—“Bacchic
Orpheus”—, is of remarkable singularity in religious history, because Christ has taken the
place of Orpheus, and not vice versa, as it is well-known from catacomb frescoes, for
example with Orpheus as the Good Shepherd. Therefore the artefact would be
syncretistic or Orphic, however with an Orpheus subjected to Dionysian suffering like Marsyas at the stake, and not like the Apollonian Orpheus with his lyra amidst tamed beasts. Bakkikos as an epithet of Orpheos is not tautologic, because beside the tradition that (as it seems to be the case here) Orpheus was killed by the enemies of his own following, there was among many others one famous variant, in which Orpheus, after returning from the Hades, abandoned his earlier habit of worshipping Dionysus-Bacchus and turned to Helios-Apollo instead, for which the insulted god had him dismembered by his Maenads. Therefore the designation Bakkikos would contrast this Orpheus on the
cross from the follower of Apollo and identify him as the founder of the Dionysian
Mysteries (see below).
edited Mar 14 at 16:37
answered Mar 14 at 16:22
luchonacholuchonacho
5,93351560
5,93351560
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
|
show 1 more comment
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
2
2
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
I was about to write an answer based on this site. It says it's a magic amulet, syncretic in nature, thus the admixture of the Christian Crucifix with a Greek deity's name.
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:29
2
2
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
I'm wondering where they got the omega and chi from…they seem to pretty clearly be an omicron and kappa in the image.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
@Rafael Please do so! Sorry to have stepped over.
– luchonacho
Mar 14 at 16:31
1
1
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
You didn't step over. But I'm no longer convinced there is one explanation. Perhaps the best answer is we don't know, but there is a number of theories about it. The paper you cite even says it is not clear whether it is a forgery, and it's currently lost!
– Rafael
Mar 14 at 16:43
1
1
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
@Rafael Do feel free to post another answer of your own! It sounds like you've got another source that neither Lucho nor I used, and competing theories are always fun.
– Draconis
Mar 14 at 16:57
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9284%2fwhat-do-these-greek-words-say-possibly-2nd-century%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I do not see that the linked article says anything about this em.it
– fdb
Mar 14 at 23:32