Character Optimization: highest DPR with the Shillelagh cantripOptimizing Riddick BuildOptimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalWhat is the most DPR possible at level 1?Optimized DPR at 10th to 13th level for a Vengeance PaladinFor Druid 2/ Sorcerer 4 “midfielder”, is the feat Polearm Master, Dual Wielding, Charger, or Savage Attacker most damaging in combat?How can I build an effective whip fighter?Is this a time to choose minimum damage per hit over average DPR?How do flat modifiers (like those from magic weapons) affect DPR comparison in GWF vs TWF?Does this low-Str/low-Dex idea for a Fighter work out?What weapon combination gives the highest DPR on my character?
How does the mezzoloth's teleportation work?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
Can a stored procedure reference the database in which it is stored?
What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?
Which big number is bigger?
How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?
Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?
Why doesn't the standard consider a template constructor as a copy constructor?
How to run Arduino codes in Java netbeans?
How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
Unknown code in script
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
Can you stand up from being prone using Skirmisher outside of your turn?
Double-nominative constructions and “von”
Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?
"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?
All ASCII characters with a given bit count
Why do games have consumables?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Character Optimization: highest DPR with the Shillelagh cantrip
Optimizing Riddick BuildOptimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalWhat is the most DPR possible at level 1?Optimized DPR at 10th to 13th level for a Vengeance PaladinFor Druid 2/ Sorcerer 4 “midfielder”, is the feat Polearm Master, Dual Wielding, Charger, or Savage Attacker most damaging in combat?How can I build an effective whip fighter?Is this a time to choose minimum damage per hit over average DPR?How do flat modifiers (like those from magic weapons) affect DPR comparison in GWF vs TWF?Does this low-Str/low-Dex idea for a Fighter work out?What weapon combination gives the highest DPR on my character?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'd like to optimize my character concept:
I want my main damage source to be a Shillelagh'd weapon and squeeze that source for all it's worth.
Table character limitations:
- Character is level 5
- Point buy for level 1 ability scores
- No multiclassing allowed
- Variant Humans and Duergar are banned
- Each character gets a free feat at level 1, provided they qualify for that feat at level 1
- All official sources are allowed and can be mixed, but UA is only allowed on a per case basis (so preferably not used), no homebrew
Optimization Goals:
- Highest average damage per round possible, using Shillelagh
- Secondary goal is highest effective number of hit points, assuming a well mixed pool of damage sources
Bonus points for:
- Not using UA
- Actually having a use for my Wisdom score besides whacking with Shillelagh
So far I have:
- Hill dwarf for the juicy Con and Wis + free HP
- Go Fighter, archetype Champion for extra attack DPR and heavy armor + shield + armored fighting style
- Take Magic Initiate feat level 1 for Shillelagh + absorb elements
- Pump Wis with ASI
dnd-5e character-creation optimization damage cantrips
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I'd like to optimize my character concept:
I want my main damage source to be a Shillelagh'd weapon and squeeze that source for all it's worth.
Table character limitations:
- Character is level 5
- Point buy for level 1 ability scores
- No multiclassing allowed
- Variant Humans and Duergar are banned
- Each character gets a free feat at level 1, provided they qualify for that feat at level 1
- All official sources are allowed and can be mixed, but UA is only allowed on a per case basis (so preferably not used), no homebrew
Optimization Goals:
- Highest average damage per round possible, using Shillelagh
- Secondary goal is highest effective number of hit points, assuming a well mixed pool of damage sources
Bonus points for:
- Not using UA
- Actually having a use for my Wisdom score besides whacking with Shillelagh
So far I have:
- Hill dwarf for the juicy Con and Wis + free HP
- Go Fighter, archetype Champion for extra attack DPR and heavy armor + shield + armored fighting style
- Take Magic Initiate feat level 1 for Shillelagh + absorb elements
- Pump Wis with ASI
dnd-5e character-creation optimization damage cantrips
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I'd like to optimize my character concept:
I want my main damage source to be a Shillelagh'd weapon and squeeze that source for all it's worth.
Table character limitations:
- Character is level 5
- Point buy for level 1 ability scores
- No multiclassing allowed
- Variant Humans and Duergar are banned
- Each character gets a free feat at level 1, provided they qualify for that feat at level 1
- All official sources are allowed and can be mixed, but UA is only allowed on a per case basis (so preferably not used), no homebrew
Optimization Goals:
- Highest average damage per round possible, using Shillelagh
- Secondary goal is highest effective number of hit points, assuming a well mixed pool of damage sources
Bonus points for:
- Not using UA
- Actually having a use for my Wisdom score besides whacking with Shillelagh
So far I have:
- Hill dwarf for the juicy Con and Wis + free HP
- Go Fighter, archetype Champion for extra attack DPR and heavy armor + shield + armored fighting style
- Take Magic Initiate feat level 1 for Shillelagh + absorb elements
- Pump Wis with ASI
dnd-5e character-creation optimization damage cantrips
$endgroup$
I'd like to optimize my character concept:
I want my main damage source to be a Shillelagh'd weapon and squeeze that source for all it's worth.
Table character limitations:
- Character is level 5
- Point buy for level 1 ability scores
- No multiclassing allowed
- Variant Humans and Duergar are banned
- Each character gets a free feat at level 1, provided they qualify for that feat at level 1
- All official sources are allowed and can be mixed, but UA is only allowed on a per case basis (so preferably not used), no homebrew
Optimization Goals:
- Highest average damage per round possible, using Shillelagh
- Secondary goal is highest effective number of hit points, assuming a well mixed pool of damage sources
Bonus points for:
- Not using UA
- Actually having a use for my Wisdom score besides whacking with Shillelagh
So far I have:
- Hill dwarf for the juicy Con and Wis + free HP
- Go Fighter, archetype Champion for extra attack DPR and heavy armor + shield + armored fighting style
- Take Magic Initiate feat level 1 for Shillelagh + absorb elements
- Pump Wis with ASI
dnd-5e character-creation optimization damage cantrips
dnd-5e character-creation optimization damage cantrips
edited 22 mins ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
27.8k598169
asked 11 hours ago
DonFusiliDonFusili
796413
796413
2
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hunter Ranger
Wisdom is one of the Ranger's main stats, you get martial features that are very strong at this level, as well as very strong utility in the form of spells and abilities. Combat-wise, you get:
- Dueling fighting style
- Extra Attack, Hunter's Prey (your pick)
- Spells (like Hunter's Mark)
You also get Favored Enemy, Natural Explorer and non-combat spells, for utility. Assuming you have cast Shillelagh, Hunter's Mark (at level 5, you can do this 6 times a day) and chosen Colossus Slayer, this means you make 3d8+2d6+4+WIS*2 when you land both your attacks on a single-target.
Compared with the Fighter, you lose some AC (medium-armor only), but you may not have disadvantage on Stealth checks, depending on which armor you choose to use. You also lose Second Wind and Action Surge (each once per short rest), and Improved Critical. I haven't done the math for Champion, but I think at level 5 you can out-DPR it as a Hunter Ranger.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to a generic anything-with-Extra-Attack-answer:
Draconic Sorcerer 5.
Benefits:
Twinned Booming Blade, allowing you to charge your stick with thunder and bash two people at once for 1d8 (bludgeoning) + 1d8 (thunder) + Wis-mod, and if those enemies move later an extra 2d8 thunder.
Draconic Sorcerer gets an increased AC and extra health (stack it with Hill Dwarf to have an unreasonably healthy sorcerer).
Haste will allow you to get another stickbash out every turn, while ensuring your enemies can't flee from your stick.
Shield will give you a ton of survivability to stick around in melee.
The downside of this is a bit of multi-ability-dependency in the build, but there are plenty of sorcerer spells that don't use charisma at all - selecting those (haste, blink, mirror image, blur, etc..) allows you to go all in on the Wisdom-melee style.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hexblade bladelock, something that gets +cha
Hexblade lets you attack with charisma. Quarterstaff is versatile rather than two-handed, so it's legit (you won't be using the versatile bit. It's redundant).
For invocations, take Thirsting blade at level 5, giving you two attacks per attack action.
Take Polearm mastery feat at level 4. That'll give you butt-stroke as a bonus action. With shillelagh, it's doing 1d8 rather than 1d4.
Cast Hex
After a startup of one turn where you only hit twice, you get three attacks per round of 1d8+1d6+3(cha)... which is about on par with a ranger who's doing the same thing, except that your hex spells refresh on a short rest, and you have hexblade's curse 1/day to play with.
Really, though, you're trying to optimize the wrong thing. "Blender optimization" is never going to get you a druid or a cleric. Beyond those, the only class that cares about wisdom is monk, and they can already use the staff with dex. They also don't have any reason to not use it two-handed, which makes it 1d8 damage anyway... so monks have no need for shillelagh. The non-monk potential blenders out there can all use martial weapons one way or the other, which will get you that 1d8 damage pretty readily, which means that the only thing it nets you there is the ability to take polearm mastery and deal 1d8 on the butt-stroke... if you have that feat. Glaive does it better, too, which means that you pretty much also need to be using a shield.
Basically, shillelagh is there to give druids something they can do in melee. It's good at that. It's not good at anything else.
You can do this, but there's really not much there to squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146820%2fcharacter-optimization-highest-dpr-with-the-shillelagh-cantrip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hunter Ranger
Wisdom is one of the Ranger's main stats, you get martial features that are very strong at this level, as well as very strong utility in the form of spells and abilities. Combat-wise, you get:
- Dueling fighting style
- Extra Attack, Hunter's Prey (your pick)
- Spells (like Hunter's Mark)
You also get Favored Enemy, Natural Explorer and non-combat spells, for utility. Assuming you have cast Shillelagh, Hunter's Mark (at level 5, you can do this 6 times a day) and chosen Colossus Slayer, this means you make 3d8+2d6+4+WIS*2 when you land both your attacks on a single-target.
Compared with the Fighter, you lose some AC (medium-armor only), but you may not have disadvantage on Stealth checks, depending on which armor you choose to use. You also lose Second Wind and Action Surge (each once per short rest), and Improved Critical. I haven't done the math for Champion, but I think at level 5 you can out-DPR it as a Hunter Ranger.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hunter Ranger
Wisdom is one of the Ranger's main stats, you get martial features that are very strong at this level, as well as very strong utility in the form of spells and abilities. Combat-wise, you get:
- Dueling fighting style
- Extra Attack, Hunter's Prey (your pick)
- Spells (like Hunter's Mark)
You also get Favored Enemy, Natural Explorer and non-combat spells, for utility. Assuming you have cast Shillelagh, Hunter's Mark (at level 5, you can do this 6 times a day) and chosen Colossus Slayer, this means you make 3d8+2d6+4+WIS*2 when you land both your attacks on a single-target.
Compared with the Fighter, you lose some AC (medium-armor only), but you may not have disadvantage on Stealth checks, depending on which armor you choose to use. You also lose Second Wind and Action Surge (each once per short rest), and Improved Critical. I haven't done the math for Champion, but I think at level 5 you can out-DPR it as a Hunter Ranger.
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hunter Ranger
Wisdom is one of the Ranger's main stats, you get martial features that are very strong at this level, as well as very strong utility in the form of spells and abilities. Combat-wise, you get:
- Dueling fighting style
- Extra Attack, Hunter's Prey (your pick)
- Spells (like Hunter's Mark)
You also get Favored Enemy, Natural Explorer and non-combat spells, for utility. Assuming you have cast Shillelagh, Hunter's Mark (at level 5, you can do this 6 times a day) and chosen Colossus Slayer, this means you make 3d8+2d6+4+WIS*2 when you land both your attacks on a single-target.
Compared with the Fighter, you lose some AC (medium-armor only), but you may not have disadvantage on Stealth checks, depending on which armor you choose to use. You also lose Second Wind and Action Surge (each once per short rest), and Improved Critical. I haven't done the math for Champion, but I think at level 5 you can out-DPR it as a Hunter Ranger.
$endgroup$
Hunter Ranger
Wisdom is one of the Ranger's main stats, you get martial features that are very strong at this level, as well as very strong utility in the form of spells and abilities. Combat-wise, you get:
- Dueling fighting style
- Extra Attack, Hunter's Prey (your pick)
- Spells (like Hunter's Mark)
You also get Favored Enemy, Natural Explorer and non-combat spells, for utility. Assuming you have cast Shillelagh, Hunter's Mark (at level 5, you can do this 6 times a day) and chosen Colossus Slayer, this means you make 3d8+2d6+4+WIS*2 when you land both your attacks on a single-target.
Compared with the Fighter, you lose some AC (medium-armor only), but you may not have disadvantage on Stealth checks, depending on which armor you choose to use. You also lose Second Wind and Action Surge (each once per short rest), and Improved Critical. I haven't done the math for Champion, but I think at level 5 you can out-DPR it as a Hunter Ranger.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 8 hours ago
BlueMoon93BlueMoon93
16.5k1190158
16.5k1190158
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"You also lose some HP"; Rangers and Fighters both have d10 hit die, so where is this loss coming from? Also, it might be worth making explicit that Shillelagh would have to come from Magic Initiate... or Wood Elf Magic (Xanathar's feat) if the race is Wood Elf (the race also gives +1 WIS).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
8 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The damage for 2 hits should include 2d6, as hunter's mark will proc on every hit.
$endgroup$
– Szega
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Fixed, my bad! Thought rangers had smaller hit die, and forgot about Hunters Mark
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Wood Elf would open up the U.A. Feat Elven Accuracy, allowing a reroll of an advantage die(later levels).
$endgroup$
– Alk
6 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Alk OP says no UA; however, Elven Accuracy made it into Xanathar's so it's not UA anymore. This could be taken at level 4 instead of the WIS bump potentially (still need to use the level 1 feat to gain access to shillelagh though).
$endgroup$
– NathanS
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to a generic anything-with-Extra-Attack-answer:
Draconic Sorcerer 5.
Benefits:
Twinned Booming Blade, allowing you to charge your stick with thunder and bash two people at once for 1d8 (bludgeoning) + 1d8 (thunder) + Wis-mod, and if those enemies move later an extra 2d8 thunder.
Draconic Sorcerer gets an increased AC and extra health (stack it with Hill Dwarf to have an unreasonably healthy sorcerer).
Haste will allow you to get another stickbash out every turn, while ensuring your enemies can't flee from your stick.
Shield will give you a ton of survivability to stick around in melee.
The downside of this is a bit of multi-ability-dependency in the build, but there are plenty of sorcerer spells that don't use charisma at all - selecting those (haste, blink, mirror image, blur, etc..) allows you to go all in on the Wisdom-melee style.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to a generic anything-with-Extra-Attack-answer:
Draconic Sorcerer 5.
Benefits:
Twinned Booming Blade, allowing you to charge your stick with thunder and bash two people at once for 1d8 (bludgeoning) + 1d8 (thunder) + Wis-mod, and if those enemies move later an extra 2d8 thunder.
Draconic Sorcerer gets an increased AC and extra health (stack it with Hill Dwarf to have an unreasonably healthy sorcerer).
Haste will allow you to get another stickbash out every turn, while ensuring your enemies can't flee from your stick.
Shield will give you a ton of survivability to stick around in melee.
The downside of this is a bit of multi-ability-dependency in the build, but there are plenty of sorcerer spells that don't use charisma at all - selecting those (haste, blink, mirror image, blur, etc..) allows you to go all in on the Wisdom-melee style.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As an alternative to a generic anything-with-Extra-Attack-answer:
Draconic Sorcerer 5.
Benefits:
Twinned Booming Blade, allowing you to charge your stick with thunder and bash two people at once for 1d8 (bludgeoning) + 1d8 (thunder) + Wis-mod, and if those enemies move later an extra 2d8 thunder.
Draconic Sorcerer gets an increased AC and extra health (stack it with Hill Dwarf to have an unreasonably healthy sorcerer).
Haste will allow you to get another stickbash out every turn, while ensuring your enemies can't flee from your stick.
Shield will give you a ton of survivability to stick around in melee.
The downside of this is a bit of multi-ability-dependency in the build, but there are plenty of sorcerer spells that don't use charisma at all - selecting those (haste, blink, mirror image, blur, etc..) allows you to go all in on the Wisdom-melee style.
$endgroup$
As an alternative to a generic anything-with-Extra-Attack-answer:
Draconic Sorcerer 5.
Benefits:
Twinned Booming Blade, allowing you to charge your stick with thunder and bash two people at once for 1d8 (bludgeoning) + 1d8 (thunder) + Wis-mod, and if those enemies move later an extra 2d8 thunder.
Draconic Sorcerer gets an increased AC and extra health (stack it with Hill Dwarf to have an unreasonably healthy sorcerer).
Haste will allow you to get another stickbash out every turn, while ensuring your enemies can't flee from your stick.
Shield will give you a ton of survivability to stick around in melee.
The downside of this is a bit of multi-ability-dependency in the build, but there are plenty of sorcerer spells that don't use charisma at all - selecting those (haste, blink, mirror image, blur, etc..) allows you to go all in on the Wisdom-melee style.
edited 44 mins ago
Davo
9111721
9111721
answered 6 hours ago
SpeedkatSpeedkat
3,973732
3,973732
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don't think you're raw allowed to use twinned green flame blade because it can hit an additional target, or something similarly silly.
$endgroup$
– goodguy5
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I love your answer, so +1, but feel like it doesn't really answer the question that's specifically about optimization. I'll definitely play this character at another, less lethal table, but will have to accept another answer.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Booming Blade would work, though. And then, uh, War Caster so you can make people go boom on AoOs.
$endgroup$
– Stackstuck
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hexblade bladelock, something that gets +cha
Hexblade lets you attack with charisma. Quarterstaff is versatile rather than two-handed, so it's legit (you won't be using the versatile bit. It's redundant).
For invocations, take Thirsting blade at level 5, giving you two attacks per attack action.
Take Polearm mastery feat at level 4. That'll give you butt-stroke as a bonus action. With shillelagh, it's doing 1d8 rather than 1d4.
Cast Hex
After a startup of one turn where you only hit twice, you get three attacks per round of 1d8+1d6+3(cha)... which is about on par with a ranger who's doing the same thing, except that your hex spells refresh on a short rest, and you have hexblade's curse 1/day to play with.
Really, though, you're trying to optimize the wrong thing. "Blender optimization" is never going to get you a druid or a cleric. Beyond those, the only class that cares about wisdom is monk, and they can already use the staff with dex. They also don't have any reason to not use it two-handed, which makes it 1d8 damage anyway... so monks have no need for shillelagh. The non-monk potential blenders out there can all use martial weapons one way or the other, which will get you that 1d8 damage pretty readily, which means that the only thing it nets you there is the ability to take polearm mastery and deal 1d8 on the butt-stroke... if you have that feat. Glaive does it better, too, which means that you pretty much also need to be using a shield.
Basically, shillelagh is there to give druids something they can do in melee. It's good at that. It's not good at anything else.
You can do this, but there's really not much there to squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hexblade bladelock, something that gets +cha
Hexblade lets you attack with charisma. Quarterstaff is versatile rather than two-handed, so it's legit (you won't be using the versatile bit. It's redundant).
For invocations, take Thirsting blade at level 5, giving you two attacks per attack action.
Take Polearm mastery feat at level 4. That'll give you butt-stroke as a bonus action. With shillelagh, it's doing 1d8 rather than 1d4.
Cast Hex
After a startup of one turn where you only hit twice, you get three attacks per round of 1d8+1d6+3(cha)... which is about on par with a ranger who's doing the same thing, except that your hex spells refresh on a short rest, and you have hexblade's curse 1/day to play with.
Really, though, you're trying to optimize the wrong thing. "Blender optimization" is never going to get you a druid or a cleric. Beyond those, the only class that cares about wisdom is monk, and they can already use the staff with dex. They also don't have any reason to not use it two-handed, which makes it 1d8 damage anyway... so monks have no need for shillelagh. The non-monk potential blenders out there can all use martial weapons one way or the other, which will get you that 1d8 damage pretty readily, which means that the only thing it nets you there is the ability to take polearm mastery and deal 1d8 on the butt-stroke... if you have that feat. Glaive does it better, too, which means that you pretty much also need to be using a shield.
Basically, shillelagh is there to give druids something they can do in melee. It's good at that. It's not good at anything else.
You can do this, but there's really not much there to squeeze.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
hexblade bladelock, something that gets +cha
Hexblade lets you attack with charisma. Quarterstaff is versatile rather than two-handed, so it's legit (you won't be using the versatile bit. It's redundant).
For invocations, take Thirsting blade at level 5, giving you two attacks per attack action.
Take Polearm mastery feat at level 4. That'll give you butt-stroke as a bonus action. With shillelagh, it's doing 1d8 rather than 1d4.
Cast Hex
After a startup of one turn where you only hit twice, you get three attacks per round of 1d8+1d6+3(cha)... which is about on par with a ranger who's doing the same thing, except that your hex spells refresh on a short rest, and you have hexblade's curse 1/day to play with.
Really, though, you're trying to optimize the wrong thing. "Blender optimization" is never going to get you a druid or a cleric. Beyond those, the only class that cares about wisdom is monk, and they can already use the staff with dex. They also don't have any reason to not use it two-handed, which makes it 1d8 damage anyway... so monks have no need for shillelagh. The non-monk potential blenders out there can all use martial weapons one way or the other, which will get you that 1d8 damage pretty readily, which means that the only thing it nets you there is the ability to take polearm mastery and deal 1d8 on the butt-stroke... if you have that feat. Glaive does it better, too, which means that you pretty much also need to be using a shield.
Basically, shillelagh is there to give druids something they can do in melee. It's good at that. It's not good at anything else.
You can do this, but there's really not much there to squeeze.
$endgroup$
hexblade bladelock, something that gets +cha
Hexblade lets you attack with charisma. Quarterstaff is versatile rather than two-handed, so it's legit (you won't be using the versatile bit. It's redundant).
For invocations, take Thirsting blade at level 5, giving you two attacks per attack action.
Take Polearm mastery feat at level 4. That'll give you butt-stroke as a bonus action. With shillelagh, it's doing 1d8 rather than 1d4.
Cast Hex
After a startup of one turn where you only hit twice, you get three attacks per round of 1d8+1d6+3(cha)... which is about on par with a ranger who's doing the same thing, except that your hex spells refresh on a short rest, and you have hexblade's curse 1/day to play with.
Really, though, you're trying to optimize the wrong thing. "Blender optimization" is never going to get you a druid or a cleric. Beyond those, the only class that cares about wisdom is monk, and they can already use the staff with dex. They also don't have any reason to not use it two-handed, which makes it 1d8 damage anyway... so monks have no need for shillelagh. The non-monk potential blenders out there can all use martial weapons one way or the other, which will get you that 1d8 damage pretty readily, which means that the only thing it nets you there is the ability to take polearm mastery and deal 1d8 on the butt-stroke... if you have that feat. Glaive does it better, too, which means that you pretty much also need to be using a shield.
Basically, shillelagh is there to give druids something they can do in melee. It's good at that. It's not good at anything else.
You can do this, but there's really not much there to squeeze.
answered 3 mins ago
Ben BardenBen Barden
12.3k23067
12.3k23067
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146820%2fcharacter-optimization-highest-dpr-with-the-shillelagh-cantrip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Why the close vote? Question seems clear enough
$endgroup$
– BlueMoon93
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Why not just play a character that you would enjoy? There's soooo more to D&D than combat and min/maxing a character.
$endgroup$
– SaggingRufus
4 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
@SaggingRufus Yes, like letting people play the way they want. But since you asked: This table's DM is notorious for fitting as many deadly encounters in an adventuring day as he can. As such, a suboptimal build I would enjoy (<-!) playing better be min/maxed if I want the character to survive even one session.
$endgroup$
– DonFusili
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
I might suggest removing "whirlwind" from the title. At first, I thought you wanted that Ranger feature in your build.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Do you mean burst damage x/long rest, burst damage x/short rest, or at-will DPR? Different builds will provide different amounts.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
1 hour ago