Is “ordinary differential equations in more than two variables” correct? Used in two books ...

Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?

Can a flute soloist sit?

Match Roman Numerals

Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Separating matrix elements by lines

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Drawing arrows from one table cell reference to another

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions



Is “ordinary differential equations in more than two variables” correct? Used in two books



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)I need an example of a differential equation (nontrivial) that involves more than one unknown functionsEliminate the arbitrary funcion - PDE first orderFinding a general solution of a partial differential equation.Didactic examples in linear ordinary differential equationsUsing the two partial differential equations construct a partial differential equation containing only variable 'G' and solve it.Geometric proof of uniqueness and existence of ordinary differential equationsSolving Differential Equations without separation of variablesWhat is main differences between these Differential Equations books?How to differentiate a given unknown function involving three variables and two arbitrary constants?Use the method of separation of variables to separate the differential equation into 3 ordinary differential equations.












3












$begingroup$


I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.



Is this terminology really correct?



The books:



The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:




In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.



...



... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag{1}$$
the point lies on a surface.



...



To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$frac{partial f}{partial x}delta x + frac{partial f}{partial y}delta y +frac{partial f}{partial z}delta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.




The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):




The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$

$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.




I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 14:33












  • $begingroup$
    In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 22 at 23:42
















3












$begingroup$


I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.



Is this terminology really correct?



The books:



The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:




In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.



...



... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag{1}$$
the point lies on a surface.



...



To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$frac{partial f}{partial x}delta x + frac{partial f}{partial y}delta y +frac{partial f}{partial z}delta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.




The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):




The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$

$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.




I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 14:33












  • $begingroup$
    In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 22 at 23:42














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.



Is this terminology really correct?



The books:



The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:




In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.



...



... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag{1}$$
the point lies on a surface.



...



To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$frac{partial f}{partial x}delta x + frac{partial f}{partial y}delta y +frac{partial f}{partial z}delta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.




The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):




The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$

$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.




I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.



Is this terminology really correct?



The books:



The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:




In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.



...



... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag{1}$$
the point lies on a surface.



...



To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$frac{partial f}{partial x}delta x + frac{partial f}{partial y}delta y +frac{partial f}{partial z}delta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.




The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):




The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$

$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.




I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?







ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 14:07







JDoeDoe

















asked Mar 22 at 13:40









JDoeDoeJDoeDoe

7851616




7851616












  • $begingroup$
    They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 14:33












  • $begingroup$
    In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 22 at 23:42


















  • $begingroup$
    They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 14:33












  • $begingroup$
    In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 22 at 23:42
















$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33






$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33














$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42




$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158161%2fis-ordinary-differential-equations-in-more-than-two-variables-correct-used-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158161%2fis-ordinary-differential-equations-in-more-than-two-variables-correct-used-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...