Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points. ...
University's motivation for having tenure-track positions
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
Intergalactic human space ship encounters another ship, character gets shunted off beyond known universe, reality starts collapsing
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
should truth entail possible truth
Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
Python - Fishing Simulator
What is the role of 'For' here?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Is 'stolen' appropriate word?
How to determine omitted units in a publication
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that the Complex plane is closed, open and perfect.Is a set without limit points necessarily closed?How to exhibit the set of all the limit points of this subset of $mathbb{R}^k$?Open and Closed Sets in $mathbb E^2$Let B ⊂ R. Let L be the set of all limit points of B. Prove that B ∪ L contains all its limit points.$V subset mathbb{R}^n$ is closed if and only if $V$ is a union of closed ballsHow can I prove that $S={x_k:kin Bbb N}cup{x_0}$ is closed in $Bbb R^n$?How can I prove that the n-dimensional hyper-rectangle is closed?How to prove a continuous function is uniformly continuous on a compact set using BW theorem?Prove that boundary points are limit points.
$begingroup$
Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points
My professor said
"We may prove that C is not closed if and only if $C^c$ has a limit point of C.
To prove this, it suffices to show that a point x in $C^c$ is a boundary point of C if and only it is a limit point of C." and he left it as an exercise.
I am a beginner of analysis and I want you to check if my proof is okay.
This is how I prove:
If part)
Let $xin C^c$ and x is a limit point of C. Then there is a sequence ${x_k}$ of distinct points in C such that $0<Vert x_k -x Vert<1/k$. Thus $N'(x;r)bigcap C$ is infinite. It follows that $N(x;r)bigcap Cneqemptyset$. Since $xin C^c$, we get $N(x;r)bigcap C^cneqemptyset$. Hence x is a boundary point of C.
Only if part)
Let $xin C^c$. Since x is a boundary point of C, there exists $x_kin C$ such that $x=lim_{kto infty} x_k$. Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}.$ Then $Vert x- x_{k_j} Vert > Vert x- x_{k_{j+1}} Vert$, so ${x_{k_j}}$ converges to x. Thus x is a limit point.
Please tell me if there is wrong or insufficient.
Is it okay just to say that "Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$"?
analysis
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points
My professor said
"We may prove that C is not closed if and only if $C^c$ has a limit point of C.
To prove this, it suffices to show that a point x in $C^c$ is a boundary point of C if and only it is a limit point of C." and he left it as an exercise.
I am a beginner of analysis and I want you to check if my proof is okay.
This is how I prove:
If part)
Let $xin C^c$ and x is a limit point of C. Then there is a sequence ${x_k}$ of distinct points in C such that $0<Vert x_k -x Vert<1/k$. Thus $N'(x;r)bigcap C$ is infinite. It follows that $N(x;r)bigcap Cneqemptyset$. Since $xin C^c$, we get $N(x;r)bigcap C^cneqemptyset$. Hence x is a boundary point of C.
Only if part)
Let $xin C^c$. Since x is a boundary point of C, there exists $x_kin C$ such that $x=lim_{kto infty} x_k$. Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}.$ Then $Vert x- x_{k_j} Vert > Vert x- x_{k_{j+1}} Vert$, so ${x_{k_j}}$ converges to x. Thus x is a limit point.
Please tell me if there is wrong or insufficient.
Is it okay just to say that "Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$"?
analysis
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
1
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
2
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points
My professor said
"We may prove that C is not closed if and only if $C^c$ has a limit point of C.
To prove this, it suffices to show that a point x in $C^c$ is a boundary point of C if and only it is a limit point of C." and he left it as an exercise.
I am a beginner of analysis and I want you to check if my proof is okay.
This is how I prove:
If part)
Let $xin C^c$ and x is a limit point of C. Then there is a sequence ${x_k}$ of distinct points in C such that $0<Vert x_k -x Vert<1/k$. Thus $N'(x;r)bigcap C$ is infinite. It follows that $N(x;r)bigcap Cneqemptyset$. Since $xin C^c$, we get $N(x;r)bigcap C^cneqemptyset$. Hence x is a boundary point of C.
Only if part)
Let $xin C^c$. Since x is a boundary point of C, there exists $x_kin C$ such that $x=lim_{kto infty} x_k$. Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}.$ Then $Vert x- x_{k_j} Vert > Vert x- x_{k_{j+1}} Vert$, so ${x_{k_j}}$ converges to x. Thus x is a limit point.
Please tell me if there is wrong or insufficient.
Is it okay just to say that "Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$"?
analysis
$endgroup$
Prove that a subset C of $mathbb R^n$ is closed if and only if it contains all its limit points.
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points
My professor said
"We may prove that C is not closed if and only if $C^c$ has a limit point of C.
To prove this, it suffices to show that a point x in $C^c$ is a boundary point of C if and only it is a limit point of C." and he left it as an exercise.
I am a beginner of analysis and I want you to check if my proof is okay.
This is how I prove:
If part)
Let $xin C^c$ and x is a limit point of C. Then there is a sequence ${x_k}$ of distinct points in C such that $0<Vert x_k -x Vert<1/k$. Thus $N'(x;r)bigcap C$ is infinite. It follows that $N(x;r)bigcap Cneqemptyset$. Since $xin C^c$, we get $N(x;r)bigcap C^cneqemptyset$. Hence x is a boundary point of C.
Only if part)
Let $xin C^c$. Since x is a boundary point of C, there exists $x_kin C$ such that $x=lim_{kto infty} x_k$. Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}.$ Then $Vert x- x_{k_j} Vert > Vert x- x_{k_{j+1}} Vert$, so ${x_{k_j}}$ converges to x. Thus x is a limit point.
Please tell me if there is wrong or insufficient.
Is it okay just to say that "Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$"?
analysis
analysis
edited May 5 '16 at 0:54
Chloe
asked May 4 '16 at 17:05
ChloeChloe
956
956
1
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
1
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
2
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
1
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
2
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
1
1
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
2
2
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For topological space, the usual definition of a closed set is that it contains all its limit points. So your statement to prove is in fact a definition.
OK so here, instead, we define a set to be closed if it contains all its boundary points.
I think your only if part can be simplified.
If $x$ is a boundary point of $C$ and $xin C^c$, then by definition there exists a sequence ${x_k}$ where $x_k ne x$ for all $k$ and
$$lim_{krightarrowinfty}x_k=x$$.
In fact, I think the proof is much simpler if you use, instead of sequence, the following definition of limit point: $x$ is a limit point of $C$ if every neighbourhood of $x$ contains at least one point of $C$ different from $x$ itself.
Then the proof is much simpler:
Let $V_x$ be any neighbourhood of $x$.
$$C text{ is not closed} iff exists x in partial C text{ and } x in C^c$$
$$iff exists x'ne x, x' in C, x'in V_x$$
$$iff x text{ is a limit point of }C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1771552%2fprove-that-a-subset-c-of-mathbb-rn-is-closed-if-and-only-if-it-contains-all%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For topological space, the usual definition of a closed set is that it contains all its limit points. So your statement to prove is in fact a definition.
OK so here, instead, we define a set to be closed if it contains all its boundary points.
I think your only if part can be simplified.
If $x$ is a boundary point of $C$ and $xin C^c$, then by definition there exists a sequence ${x_k}$ where $x_k ne x$ for all $k$ and
$$lim_{krightarrowinfty}x_k=x$$.
In fact, I think the proof is much simpler if you use, instead of sequence, the following definition of limit point: $x$ is a limit point of $C$ if every neighbourhood of $x$ contains at least one point of $C$ different from $x$ itself.
Then the proof is much simpler:
Let $V_x$ be any neighbourhood of $x$.
$$C text{ is not closed} iff exists x in partial C text{ and } x in C^c$$
$$iff exists x'ne x, x' in C, x'in V_x$$
$$iff x text{ is a limit point of }C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For topological space, the usual definition of a closed set is that it contains all its limit points. So your statement to prove is in fact a definition.
OK so here, instead, we define a set to be closed if it contains all its boundary points.
I think your only if part can be simplified.
If $x$ is a boundary point of $C$ and $xin C^c$, then by definition there exists a sequence ${x_k}$ where $x_k ne x$ for all $k$ and
$$lim_{krightarrowinfty}x_k=x$$.
In fact, I think the proof is much simpler if you use, instead of sequence, the following definition of limit point: $x$ is a limit point of $C$ if every neighbourhood of $x$ contains at least one point of $C$ different from $x$ itself.
Then the proof is much simpler:
Let $V_x$ be any neighbourhood of $x$.
$$C text{ is not closed} iff exists x in partial C text{ and } x in C^c$$
$$iff exists x'ne x, x' in C, x'in V_x$$
$$iff x text{ is a limit point of }C$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For topological space, the usual definition of a closed set is that it contains all its limit points. So your statement to prove is in fact a definition.
OK so here, instead, we define a set to be closed if it contains all its boundary points.
I think your only if part can be simplified.
If $x$ is a boundary point of $C$ and $xin C^c$, then by definition there exists a sequence ${x_k}$ where $x_k ne x$ for all $k$ and
$$lim_{krightarrowinfty}x_k=x$$.
In fact, I think the proof is much simpler if you use, instead of sequence, the following definition of limit point: $x$ is a limit point of $C$ if every neighbourhood of $x$ contains at least one point of $C$ different from $x$ itself.
Then the proof is much simpler:
Let $V_x$ be any neighbourhood of $x$.
$$C text{ is not closed} iff exists x in partial C text{ and } x in C^c$$
$$iff exists x'ne x, x' in C, x'in V_x$$
$$iff x text{ is a limit point of }C$$
$endgroup$
For topological space, the usual definition of a closed set is that it contains all its limit points. So your statement to prove is in fact a definition.
OK so here, instead, we define a set to be closed if it contains all its boundary points.
I think your only if part can be simplified.
If $x$ is a boundary point of $C$ and $xin C^c$, then by definition there exists a sequence ${x_k}$ where $x_k ne x$ for all $k$ and
$$lim_{krightarrowinfty}x_k=x$$.
In fact, I think the proof is much simpler if you use, instead of sequence, the following definition of limit point: $x$ is a limit point of $C$ if every neighbourhood of $x$ contains at least one point of $C$ different from $x$ itself.
Then the proof is much simpler:
Let $V_x$ be any neighbourhood of $x$.
$$C text{ is not closed} iff exists x in partial C text{ and } x in C^c$$
$$iff exists x'ne x, x' in C, x'in V_x$$
$$iff x text{ is a limit point of }C$$
edited May 5 '16 at 12:51
answered May 5 '16 at 10:33
velut lunavelut luna
8,08111240
8,08111240
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1771552%2fprove-that-a-subset-c-of-mathbb-rn-is-closed-if-and-only-if-it-contains-all%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Can you give an example of ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j} ne x_{k_j}$?
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
May 4 '16 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Sorry Choose ${x_{k_j}}$ where $x_{k_j}neq x_{k_l}$, not j but l.
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 17:16
1
$begingroup$
How is a closed set defined?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 4 '16 at 18:07
$begingroup$
A closed set is defined by a set of all boundary points!
$endgroup$
– Chloe
May 4 '16 at 23:59
2
$begingroup$
You mean a closed set is defined to be a set that contains all its boundary points?
$endgroup$
– velut luna
May 5 '16 at 1:10