When is the set of positive elements in a C* algebra a totally ordered set The 2019 Stack...

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?

What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?

Can each chord in a progression create its own key?

What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?

Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books

Homework question about an engine pulling a train

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

"is" operation returns false even though two objects have same id

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Do ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

Circular reasoning in L'Hopital's rule

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?



When is the set of positive elements in a C* algebra a totally ordered set



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)strictly positive elements in $C^*$-algebraFinding Strictly Positive ElementsCharacterization of positive elements in unital C*-algebraA simple question about positive element in C*-algebraWhy does the order on positive elements respect the order on the norm?Positive elements in a Banach algebraWhy the self-adjointness condition for positivity of an element of a C*-algebra?positive elements in the unitization of a $C^*$-algebraPositive elements in * AlgebrasBounding norms with sums of positive elements












0












$begingroup$


As the title suggests I was wondering if there are any properties that ensure a C*-algebra has all positive elements comparable to each other. ( Recall $aleq b$ if $b-a$ is a positive element in the C* algebra)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a full lattice ?
    $endgroup$
    – Epsilon
    Mar 22 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:02
















0












$begingroup$


As the title suggests I was wondering if there are any properties that ensure a C*-algebra has all positive elements comparable to each other. ( Recall $aleq b$ if $b-a$ is a positive element in the C* algebra)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is a full lattice ?
    $endgroup$
    – Epsilon
    Mar 22 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:02














0












0








0





$begingroup$


As the title suggests I was wondering if there are any properties that ensure a C*-algebra has all positive elements comparable to each other. ( Recall $aleq b$ if $b-a$ is a positive element in the C* algebra)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




As the title suggests I was wondering if there are any properties that ensure a C*-algebra has all positive elements comparable to each other. ( Recall $aleq b$ if $b-a$ is a positive element in the C* algebra)







c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 15:01







sirjoe

















asked Mar 22 at 13:02









sirjoesirjoe

846




846












  • $begingroup$
    What is a full lattice ?
    $endgroup$
    – Epsilon
    Mar 22 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:02


















  • $begingroup$
    What is a full lattice ?
    $endgroup$
    – Epsilon
    Mar 22 at 13:48










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:02
















$begingroup$
What is a full lattice ?
$endgroup$
– Epsilon
Mar 22 at 13:48




$begingroup$
What is a full lattice ?
$endgroup$
– Epsilon
Mar 22 at 13:48












$begingroup$
Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
$endgroup$
– sirjoe
Mar 22 at 15:02




$begingroup$
Yes it wasn't clear what I meant, I changed the title now
$endgroup$
– sirjoe
Mar 22 at 15:02










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Here is a partial answer:



Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. Assume that there is a projection $p$ such that $p not in {0,1}$. Then $p$ and $1-p$ are not comparable : indeed, the spectrum of $p - (1-p)$ is ${pm 1}$ so $p - (1-p)$ is not positive, and the same goes for $1-p - p = 1 - 2p$.



EDIT:



Claim: It never happens if the algebra is unital and not $mathbb{C}$.



Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra of dimension greater or equal than $2$. Then there is $a in A$ such that the subalgebra generated by $a$ isn't isomorphic to $mathbb{C}$.



[EDIT2: We can assume that $a$ is normal. Indeed, if both $a+a^*$ or $a-a^*$ are elements of $mathbb{C}$, then $a$ is as well. So, $a+a^* not in mathbb{C}$ or $a-a^* not in mathbb{C}$, and each of these possibilities gives a normal element of $A setminus mathbb{C}$.]



Let us denote by $B$ the closure of this subalgebra. Then $B$ is commutative, since $a$ is assumed to be normal, so it is isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ where $X$ is a compact space with at least two points, $x$ and $y$. Since $X$ is normal, there is a positive continuous function $f$ such that $f(x) = 0$ and $f(y) = 1$, and there is a positive continuous function $g$ such that $g(x) = 1$ and $g(y) = 0$. Then $f$ and $g$ are not comparable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
    $endgroup$
    – s.harp
    Mar 24 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
    $endgroup$
    – Plop
    Mar 25 at 10:32












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158113%2fwhen-is-the-set-of-positive-elements-in-a-c-algebra-a-totally-ordered-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Here is a partial answer:



Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. Assume that there is a projection $p$ such that $p not in {0,1}$. Then $p$ and $1-p$ are not comparable : indeed, the spectrum of $p - (1-p)$ is ${pm 1}$ so $p - (1-p)$ is not positive, and the same goes for $1-p - p = 1 - 2p$.



EDIT:



Claim: It never happens if the algebra is unital and not $mathbb{C}$.



Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra of dimension greater or equal than $2$. Then there is $a in A$ such that the subalgebra generated by $a$ isn't isomorphic to $mathbb{C}$.



[EDIT2: We can assume that $a$ is normal. Indeed, if both $a+a^*$ or $a-a^*$ are elements of $mathbb{C}$, then $a$ is as well. So, $a+a^* not in mathbb{C}$ or $a-a^* not in mathbb{C}$, and each of these possibilities gives a normal element of $A setminus mathbb{C}$.]



Let us denote by $B$ the closure of this subalgebra. Then $B$ is commutative, since $a$ is assumed to be normal, so it is isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ where $X$ is a compact space with at least two points, $x$ and $y$. Since $X$ is normal, there is a positive continuous function $f$ such that $f(x) = 0$ and $f(y) = 1$, and there is a positive continuous function $g$ such that $g(x) = 1$ and $g(y) = 0$. Then $f$ and $g$ are not comparable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
    $endgroup$
    – s.harp
    Mar 24 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
    $endgroup$
    – Plop
    Mar 25 at 10:32
















2












$begingroup$

Here is a partial answer:



Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. Assume that there is a projection $p$ such that $p not in {0,1}$. Then $p$ and $1-p$ are not comparable : indeed, the spectrum of $p - (1-p)$ is ${pm 1}$ so $p - (1-p)$ is not positive, and the same goes for $1-p - p = 1 - 2p$.



EDIT:



Claim: It never happens if the algebra is unital and not $mathbb{C}$.



Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra of dimension greater or equal than $2$. Then there is $a in A$ such that the subalgebra generated by $a$ isn't isomorphic to $mathbb{C}$.



[EDIT2: We can assume that $a$ is normal. Indeed, if both $a+a^*$ or $a-a^*$ are elements of $mathbb{C}$, then $a$ is as well. So, $a+a^* not in mathbb{C}$ or $a-a^* not in mathbb{C}$, and each of these possibilities gives a normal element of $A setminus mathbb{C}$.]



Let us denote by $B$ the closure of this subalgebra. Then $B$ is commutative, since $a$ is assumed to be normal, so it is isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ where $X$ is a compact space with at least two points, $x$ and $y$. Since $X$ is normal, there is a positive continuous function $f$ such that $f(x) = 0$ and $f(y) = 1$, and there is a positive continuous function $g$ such that $g(x) = 1$ and $g(y) = 0$. Then $f$ and $g$ are not comparable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
    $endgroup$
    – s.harp
    Mar 24 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
    $endgroup$
    – Plop
    Mar 25 at 10:32














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Here is a partial answer:



Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. Assume that there is a projection $p$ such that $p not in {0,1}$. Then $p$ and $1-p$ are not comparable : indeed, the spectrum of $p - (1-p)$ is ${pm 1}$ so $p - (1-p)$ is not positive, and the same goes for $1-p - p = 1 - 2p$.



EDIT:



Claim: It never happens if the algebra is unital and not $mathbb{C}$.



Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra of dimension greater or equal than $2$. Then there is $a in A$ such that the subalgebra generated by $a$ isn't isomorphic to $mathbb{C}$.



[EDIT2: We can assume that $a$ is normal. Indeed, if both $a+a^*$ or $a-a^*$ are elements of $mathbb{C}$, then $a$ is as well. So, $a+a^* not in mathbb{C}$ or $a-a^* not in mathbb{C}$, and each of these possibilities gives a normal element of $A setminus mathbb{C}$.]



Let us denote by $B$ the closure of this subalgebra. Then $B$ is commutative, since $a$ is assumed to be normal, so it is isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ where $X$ is a compact space with at least two points, $x$ and $y$. Since $X$ is normal, there is a positive continuous function $f$ such that $f(x) = 0$ and $f(y) = 1$, and there is a positive continuous function $g$ such that $g(x) = 1$ and $g(y) = 0$. Then $f$ and $g$ are not comparable.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Here is a partial answer:



Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra. Assume that there is a projection $p$ such that $p not in {0,1}$. Then $p$ and $1-p$ are not comparable : indeed, the spectrum of $p - (1-p)$ is ${pm 1}$ so $p - (1-p)$ is not positive, and the same goes for $1-p - p = 1 - 2p$.



EDIT:



Claim: It never happens if the algebra is unital and not $mathbb{C}$.



Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra of dimension greater or equal than $2$. Then there is $a in A$ such that the subalgebra generated by $a$ isn't isomorphic to $mathbb{C}$.



[EDIT2: We can assume that $a$ is normal. Indeed, if both $a+a^*$ or $a-a^*$ are elements of $mathbb{C}$, then $a$ is as well. So, $a+a^* not in mathbb{C}$ or $a-a^* not in mathbb{C}$, and each of these possibilities gives a normal element of $A setminus mathbb{C}$.]



Let us denote by $B$ the closure of this subalgebra. Then $B$ is commutative, since $a$ is assumed to be normal, so it is isomorphic to $C_0(X)$ where $X$ is a compact space with at least two points, $x$ and $y$. Since $X$ is normal, there is a positive continuous function $f$ such that $f(x) = 0$ and $f(y) = 1$, and there is a positive continuous function $g$ such that $g(x) = 1$ and $g(y) = 0$. Then $f$ and $g$ are not comparable.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 25 at 10:31

























answered Mar 22 at 15:14









PlopPlop

485216




485216












  • $begingroup$
    I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
    $endgroup$
    – s.harp
    Mar 24 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
    $endgroup$
    – Plop
    Mar 25 at 10:32


















  • $begingroup$
    I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – sirjoe
    Mar 22 at 15:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
    $endgroup$
    – s.harp
    Mar 24 at 15:32










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
    $endgroup$
    – Plop
    Mar 25 at 10:32
















$begingroup$
I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
$endgroup$
– sirjoe
Mar 22 at 15:25




$begingroup$
I guess in this case the C* algebra would need to be projectionles. so this would never hold for Von Neuman algebras. But I wonder if you have a totally ordered set in projectionless C* algebras e.g. the Jiang-Su algebra.
$endgroup$
– sirjoe
Mar 22 at 15:25




1




1




$begingroup$
About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
$endgroup$
– s.harp
Mar 24 at 15:32




$begingroup$
About your edit: $B$ is not commutative unless $a$ is normal. That is not a serious restriction however, as $a+a^*$ and $a-a^*$ are normal.
$endgroup$
– s.harp
Mar 24 at 15:32












$begingroup$
Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
$endgroup$
– Plop
Mar 25 at 10:32




$begingroup$
Thanks for spotting my mistake. I forgot the $*$ in $C^*$-algebra :D
$endgroup$
– Plop
Mar 25 at 10:32


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158113%2fwhen-is-the-set-of-positive-elements-in-a-c-algebra-a-totally-ordered-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...