Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic...

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

Non-trope happy ending?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?

Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Can you use Vicious Mockery to win an argument or gain favours?

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol

Review your own paper in Mathematics

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

How much of a Devil Fruit must be consumed to gain the power?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Why should universal income be universal?

How can I write humor as character trait?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

C++ copy constructor called at return



Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic triangles


Proof of “triangles are similar iff corresponding angles are equal”Similar Triangles with proportionsSimilar triangles anglesSimilar Triangles Problem (No corresponding sides)Finding the largest equilateral triangle inside a given triangleIs there a relationship for a triangle's side lengths, altitude/height, and acute/obtuse/right?How are these triangles similar?Finding the area of an orthic triangle (DEF) when given vertices of triangle ABC.Mobius transformation producing a curved triangle with 3 intersecting circlesSAT Math Problem - Corresponding Angles in Similar Triangles













3












$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52
















3












$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52














3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?







geometry number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 13 at 8:01









Blue

49.1k870156




49.1k870156










asked Mar 13 at 7:06









Shauryam AkhouryShauryam Akhoury

5216




5216








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52








1




1




$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45






$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52




$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases{
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\}
$$

That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases{
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
}
$$

No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
    $$
    cases{
    (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
    (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\}
    $$

    That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



    On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
    $$
    cases{
    a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
    a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
    }
    $$

    No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



    In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
      $$
      cases{
      (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
      (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\}
      $$

      That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



      On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
      $$
      cases{
      a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
      a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
      }
      $$

      No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



      In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
        $$
        cases{
        (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
        (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\}
        $$

        That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



        On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
        $$
        cases{
        a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
        a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
        }
        $$

        No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



        In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
        $$
        cases{
        (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
        (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\}
        $$

        That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



        On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
        $$
        cases{
        a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
        a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
        }
        $$

        No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



        In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 14 at 14:10

























        answered Mar 14 at 9:51









        AretinoAretino

        25.4k21445




        25.4k21445






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...