Symmetry in an almost periodic functionFundamental period of two functionsInfinite sum of cosecant, $frac...

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

15% tax on $7.5k earnings. Is that right?

What does Apple's new App Store requirement mean

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Review your own paper in Mathematics

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Creating two special characters

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

How does electrical safety system work on ISS?

Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years

How can ping know if my host is down

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?

How can I write humor as character trait?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

PTIJ: Why is Haman obsessed with Bose?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?

Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?

How many arrows is an archer expected to fire by the end of the Tyranny of Dragons pair of adventures?



Symmetry in an almost periodic function


Fundamental period of two functionsInfinite sum of cosecant, $frac k{sin(a+ck)}$Can any periodic function be represented as a trigonometric series?Almost periodic functionsIf almost-periodic function is not identically zero, then it is not in L2Almost periodic functionAlmost periodic function with mean value zeroIs Heaviside step function or unit step function periodic?Besicovitch almost periodic functions with seminorm zeroMean value of an almost periodic functionQuasi-periodic sequence













6












$begingroup$


A comment under this answer suggests looking at the graph of $$f(t) = sin t + sin(sqrt 2 t) + sin(sqrt3 t),$$ and I did so, on the interval $0le tle 60.$ I was struck by a seeming near-symmetry, so I let $$g(t) = f(60-t)$$ and superimposed the graphs of $f$ and $g$ on each other and saw how close they are to each other. The correlation between $f$ and $g$ on that interval is more than $0.97.$ Is there some reason for that?



Remark: In one sense the answer is perfectly obvious and is that given by "Reese" below. Yet the fact that such small numbers of half-periods should be so close to each other, although it explains what we see, itself feels as if it calls for explanation.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jul 25 '18 at 18:38
















6












$begingroup$


A comment under this answer suggests looking at the graph of $$f(t) = sin t + sin(sqrt 2 t) + sin(sqrt3 t),$$ and I did so, on the interval $0le tle 60.$ I was struck by a seeming near-symmetry, so I let $$g(t) = f(60-t)$$ and superimposed the graphs of $f$ and $g$ on each other and saw how close they are to each other. The correlation between $f$ and $g$ on that interval is more than $0.97.$ Is there some reason for that?



Remark: In one sense the answer is perfectly obvious and is that given by "Reese" below. Yet the fact that such small numbers of half-periods should be so close to each other, although it explains what we see, itself feels as if it calls for explanation.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jul 25 '18 at 18:38














6












6








6


0



$begingroup$


A comment under this answer suggests looking at the graph of $$f(t) = sin t + sin(sqrt 2 t) + sin(sqrt3 t),$$ and I did so, on the interval $0le tle 60.$ I was struck by a seeming near-symmetry, so I let $$g(t) = f(60-t)$$ and superimposed the graphs of $f$ and $g$ on each other and saw how close they are to each other. The correlation between $f$ and $g$ on that interval is more than $0.97.$ Is there some reason for that?



Remark: In one sense the answer is perfectly obvious and is that given by "Reese" below. Yet the fact that such small numbers of half-periods should be so close to each other, although it explains what we see, itself feels as if it calls for explanation.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A comment under this answer suggests looking at the graph of $$f(t) = sin t + sin(sqrt 2 t) + sin(sqrt3 t),$$ and I did so, on the interval $0le tle 60.$ I was struck by a seeming near-symmetry, so I let $$g(t) = f(60-t)$$ and superimposed the graphs of $f$ and $g$ on each other and saw how close they are to each other. The correlation between $f$ and $g$ on that interval is more than $0.97.$ Is there some reason for that?



Remark: In one sense the answer is perfectly obvious and is that given by "Reese" below. Yet the fact that such small numbers of half-periods should be so close to each other, although it explains what we see, itself feels as if it calls for explanation.



enter image description here







trigonometric-series almost-periodic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 13 at 4:47









Martin Sleziak

44.9k10121274




44.9k10121274










asked Feb 13 '17 at 1:16









Michael HardyMichael Hardy

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jul 25 '18 at 18:38


















  • $begingroup$
    MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Sleziak
    Jul 25 '18 at 18:38
















$begingroup$
MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Jul 25 '18 at 18:38




$begingroup$
MichaelHardy: Since you are the tag creator, I though it might be useful to let you know that there is a post on meta suggesting the removal of the (coincindences) tag: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/27653/tag-management-2018/…
$endgroup$
– Martin Sleziak
Jul 25 '18 at 18:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

$sqrt{2} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $27pi$; $sqrt{3} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $33pi$. And $60$ isn't far from $19pi$. And conveniently, $sin(npi - x) = sin(x)$ whenever $n$ is odd. So all three component functions come close to lining up under the transformation $t to 60 - t$, creating a cool little coincidence when you add them all together.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Feb 13 '17 at 2:11











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2141721%2fsymmetry-in-an-almost-periodic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

$sqrt{2} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $27pi$; $sqrt{3} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $33pi$. And $60$ isn't far from $19pi$. And conveniently, $sin(npi - x) = sin(x)$ whenever $n$ is odd. So all three component functions come close to lining up under the transformation $t to 60 - t$, creating a cool little coincidence when you add them all together.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Feb 13 '17 at 2:11
















8












$begingroup$

$sqrt{2} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $27pi$; $sqrt{3} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $33pi$. And $60$ isn't far from $19pi$. And conveniently, $sin(npi - x) = sin(x)$ whenever $n$ is odd. So all three component functions come close to lining up under the transformation $t to 60 - t$, creating a cool little coincidence when you add them all together.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Feb 13 '17 at 2:11














8












8








8





$begingroup$

$sqrt{2} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $27pi$; $sqrt{3} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $33pi$. And $60$ isn't far from $19pi$. And conveniently, $sin(npi - x) = sin(x)$ whenever $n$ is odd. So all three component functions come close to lining up under the transformation $t to 60 - t$, creating a cool little coincidence when you add them all together.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$sqrt{2} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $27pi$; $sqrt{3} cdot 60$ is almost exactly $33pi$. And $60$ isn't far from $19pi$. And conveniently, $sin(npi - x) = sin(x)$ whenever $n$ is odd. So all three component functions come close to lining up under the transformation $t to 60 - t$, creating a cool little coincidence when you add them all together.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 13 '17 at 1:22









ReeseReese

15.3k11338




15.3k11338








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Feb 13 '17 at 2:11














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    Feb 13 '17 at 2:11








1




1




$begingroup$
This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
Feb 13 '17 at 2:11




$begingroup$
This is all perfectly obvious, but still it's astonishing, partly because those multiples of the periods are so small.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
Feb 13 '17 at 2:11


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2141721%2fsymmetry-in-an-almost-periodic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...