Show that a system of equations has a unique solution and indicate the solutionSolution of a system of linear...
Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?
PTIJ: How can I halachically kill a vampire?
In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?
Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?
My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?
How much stiffer are 23c tires over 28c?
Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call
How much attack damage does the AC boost from a shield prevent on average?
Make a transparent 448*448 image
Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?
Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience
Built-In Shelves/Bookcases - IKEA vs Built
Peter's Strange Word
They call me Inspector Morse
Does a Catoblepas statblock appear in an official D&D 5e product?
What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?
How are such low op-amp input currents possible?
Force user to remove USB token
Grey hair or white hair
Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?
Low budget alien movie about the Earth being cooked
Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?
What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?
How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?
Show that a system of equations has a unique solution and indicate the solution
Solution of a system of linear equationsProving that a set of vectors is a basis in P_3Determining the coordinates of a vector with respect to a basisNecessary condition for uniqueness solution in a system of non-linear equationsCan some inequalities help to pin down an unique solution in a linear system of equations with infinite solutions?Solving a combined system of linear and bilinear equationswhat are the relations between the constant (a,b and c) so that the following system of linear equations has a unique solution?Determining the maximum number of linearly independent rows and columns for a given matrixdual space and basis of polynomials (basic question)Show that a system of 4 equations has a unique solution
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$
$$
begin{cases}
lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
end{cases}
$$
and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is
$$
lambda_1=a\
lambda_2=b\
lambda_3=c\
lambda_4=d\
$$
I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$
$$
begin{cases}
lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
end{cases}
$$
and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is
$$
lambda_1=a\
lambda_2=b\
lambda_3=c\
lambda_4=d\
$$
I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$
$$
begin{cases}
lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
end{cases}
$$
and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is
$$
lambda_1=a\
lambda_2=b\
lambda_3=c\
lambda_4=d\
$$
I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
$endgroup$
Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$
$$
begin{cases}
lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
end{cases}
$$
and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is
$$
lambda_1=a\
lambda_2=b\
lambda_3=c\
lambda_4=d\
$$
I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
linear-algebra systems-of-equations
edited Mar 9 at 17:45
Rodrigo de Azevedo
13k41960
13k41960
asked Mar 9 at 17:23
STFSTF
521422
521422
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:
>>> from sympy import *
>>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
>>>
>>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
[ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
[ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:
>>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
Matrix([
[-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
[ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
[ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:
>>> _.rref()
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
Simplifying:
>>> simplify(_)
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c],
[0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)
$$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$
Putting it all together we write:
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$
We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141369%2fshow-that-a-system-of-equations-has-a-unique-solution-and-indicate-the-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:
>>> from sympy import *
>>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
>>>
>>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
[ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
[ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:
>>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
Matrix([
[-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
[ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
[ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:
>>> _.rref()
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
Simplifying:
>>> simplify(_)
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c],
[0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:
>>> from sympy import *
>>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
>>>
>>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
[ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
[ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:
>>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
Matrix([
[-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
[ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
[ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:
>>> _.rref()
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
Simplifying:
>>> simplify(_)
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c],
[0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:
>>> from sympy import *
>>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
>>>
>>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
[ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
[ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:
>>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
Matrix([
[-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
[ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
[ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:
>>> _.rref()
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
Simplifying:
>>> simplify(_)
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c],
[0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
$endgroup$
Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:
>>> from sympy import *
>>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
>>>
>>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
[ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
[ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:
>>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
Matrix([
[-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
[ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
[ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
[ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
[ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])
Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:
>>> _.rref()
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
[0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
Simplifying:
>>> simplify(_)
(Matrix([
[1, 0, 0, 0, a],
[0, 1, 0, 0, b],
[0, 0, 1, 0, c],
[0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])
answered Mar 9 at 17:55
Rodrigo de AzevedoRodrigo de Azevedo
13k41960
13k41960
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 9 at 19:10
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
$begingroup$
@STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
$endgroup$
– Rodrigo de Azevedo
Mar 9 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)
$$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$
Putting it all together we write:
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$
We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)
$$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$
Putting it all together we write:
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$
We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)
$$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$
Putting it all together we write:
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$
We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.
$endgroup$
Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)
$$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.
$$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$
Putting it all together we write:
$$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$
We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.
answered Mar 9 at 18:14
Ismail GadzhievIsmail Gadzhiev
31
31
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141369%2fshow-that-a-system-of-equations-has-a-unique-solution-and-indicate-the-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown