Show that a system of equations has a unique solution and indicate the solutionSolution of a system of linear...

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

PTIJ: How can I halachically kill a vampire?

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?

How much stiffer are 23c tires over 28c?

Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call

How much attack damage does the AC boost from a shield prevent on average?

Make a transparent 448*448 image

Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?

Rejected in 4th interview round citing insufficient years of experience

Built-In Shelves/Bookcases - IKEA vs Built

Peter's Strange Word

They call me Inspector Morse

Does a Catoblepas statblock appear in an official D&D 5e product?

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

How are such low op-amp input currents possible?

Force user to remove USB token

Grey hair or white hair

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

Low budget alien movie about the Earth being cooked

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?

How to create a hard link to an inode (ext4)?



Show that a system of equations has a unique solution and indicate the solution


Solution of a system of linear equationsProving that a set of vectors is a basis in P_3Determining the coordinates of a vector with respect to a basisNecessary condition for uniqueness solution in a system of non-linear equationsCan some inequalities help to pin down an unique solution in a linear system of equations with infinite solutions?Solving a combined system of linear and bilinear equationswhat are the relations between the constant (a,b and c) so that the following system of linear equations has a unique solution?Determining the maximum number of linearly independent rows and columns for a given matrixdual space and basis of polynomials (basic question)Show that a system of 4 equations has a unique solution













1












$begingroup$



Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$



$$
begin{cases}
lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
end{cases}
$$



and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is



$$
lambda_1=a\
lambda_2=b\
lambda_3=c\
lambda_4=d\
$$




I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$



    Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$



    $$
    begin{cases}
    lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
    lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
    lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
    lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
    lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
    lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
    end{cases}
    $$



    and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is



    $$
    lambda_1=a\
    lambda_2=b\
    lambda_3=c\
    lambda_4=d\
    $$




    I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$



      Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$



      $$
      begin{cases}
      lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
      lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
      lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
      lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
      lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
      lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
      end{cases}
      $$



      and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is



      $$
      lambda_1=a\
      lambda_2=b\
      lambda_3=c\
      lambda_4=d\
      $$




      I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Consider the following system of equations with strictly positive unknowns $lambda_1,lambda_2,lambda_3,lambda_4$



      $$
      begin{cases}
      lambda_1 d=lambda_4 a\
      lambda_2 d=lambda_4 b\
      lambda_1 c=lambda_3 a\
      lambda_2 c=lambda_3 b\
      lambda_3 d=lambda_4 c\
      lambda_1+lambda_2+lambda_3+lambda_4=1
      end{cases}
      $$



      and parameters $a>0,b>0,c>0,d>0$ with $a+b+c+d=1$. Show that the unique solution of the system is



      $$
      lambda_1=a\
      lambda_2=b\
      lambda_3=c\
      lambda_4=d\
      $$




      I tried by taking several routes but I couldn't find any clear pattern.







      linear-algebra systems-of-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 9 at 17:45









      Rodrigo de Azevedo

      13k41960




      13k41960










      asked Mar 9 at 17:23









      STFSTF

      521422




      521422






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:



          >>> from sympy import *
          >>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
          >>>
          >>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
          [ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
          [ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
          [ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
          [ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
          [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


          Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:



          >>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
          Matrix([
          [-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
          [ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
          [ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
          [ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
          [ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
          [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


          Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:



          >>> _.rref()
          (Matrix([
          [1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
          [0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
          [0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
          [0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
          [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
          [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])


          Simplifying:



          >>> simplify(_)
          (Matrix([
          [1, 0, 0, 0, a],
          [0, 1, 0, 0, b],
          [0, 0, 1, 0, c],
          [0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
          [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
          [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])





          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
            $endgroup$
            – STF
            Mar 9 at 19:10










          • $begingroup$
            @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
            $endgroup$
            – Rodrigo de Azevedo
            Mar 9 at 19:26





















          0












          $begingroup$

          Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)



          $$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
          $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
          $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$



          Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.



          $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$



          Putting it all together we write:



          $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$



          We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141369%2fshow-that-a-system-of-equations-has-a-unique-solution-and-indicate-the-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:



            >>> from sympy import *
            >>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
            >>>
            >>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
            [ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
            [ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:



            >>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
            Matrix([
            [-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
            [ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
            [ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:



            >>> _.rref()
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])


            Simplifying:



            >>> simplify(_)
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])





            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
              $endgroup$
              – STF
              Mar 9 at 19:10










            • $begingroup$
              @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
              $endgroup$
              – Rodrigo de Azevedo
              Mar 9 at 19:26


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:



            >>> from sympy import *
            >>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
            >>>
            >>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
            [ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
            [ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:



            >>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
            Matrix([
            [-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
            [ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
            [ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:



            >>> _.rref()
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])


            Simplifying:



            >>> simplify(_)
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])





            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
              $endgroup$
              – STF
              Mar 9 at 19:10










            • $begingroup$
              @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
              $endgroup$
              – Rodrigo de Azevedo
              Mar 9 at 19:26
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:



            >>> from sympy import *
            >>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
            >>>
            >>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
            [ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
            [ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:



            >>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
            Matrix([
            [-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
            [ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
            [ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:



            >>> _.rref()
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])


            Simplifying:



            >>> simplify(_)
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])





            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Using SymPy, we create the augmented matrix:



            >>> from sympy import *
            >>> a, b, c, d = symbols('a b c d', real=True, positive=True)
            >>>
            >>> M = Matrix([[ d, 0, 0,-a, 0],
            [ 0, d, 0,-b, 0],
            [ c, 0,-a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c,-b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, d,-c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Imposing the constraint $a + b + c + d = 1$:



            >>> M.subs(d,1-a-b-c)
            Matrix([
            [-a - b - c + 1, 0, 0, -a, 0],
            [ 0, -a - b - c + 1, 0, -b, 0],
            [ c, 0, -a, 0, 0],
            [ 0, c, -b, 0, 0],
            [ 0, 0, -a - b - c + 1, -c, 0],
            [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]])


            Using Gaussian elimination to compute the RREF:



            >>> _.rref()
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c/((-a - b - c + 1)*(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1))],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, 1/(a/(-a - b - c + 1) + b/(-a - b - c + 1) + c/(-a - b - c + 1) + 1)],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])


            Simplifying:



            >>> simplify(_)
            (Matrix([
            [1, 0, 0, 0, a],
            [0, 1, 0, 0, b],
            [0, 0, 1, 0, c],
            [0, 0, 0, 1, -a - b - c + 1],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
            [0, 0, 0, 0, 0]]), [0, 1, 2, 3])






            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 9 at 17:55









            Rodrigo de AzevedoRodrigo de Azevedo

            13k41960




            13k41960












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
              $endgroup$
              – STF
              Mar 9 at 19:10










            • $begingroup$
              @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
              $endgroup$
              – Rodrigo de Azevedo
              Mar 9 at 19:26




















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
              $endgroup$
              – STF
              Mar 9 at 19:10










            • $begingroup$
              @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
              $endgroup$
              – Rodrigo de Azevedo
              Mar 9 at 19:26


















            $begingroup$
            Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
            $endgroup$
            – STF
            Mar 9 at 19:10




            $begingroup$
            Thanks, but I'm not sure about the conclusion. Could you indicate in English what we can conclude from your lines?
            $endgroup$
            – STF
            Mar 9 at 19:10












            $begingroup$
            @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
            $endgroup$
            – Rodrigo de Azevedo
            Mar 9 at 19:26






            $begingroup$
            @STF We can conclude precisely what the question asked one to show. Note that the RREF'ed augmented matrix is $$begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & a\0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & b\0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & c\0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & - a - b - c + 1\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0end{bmatrix}$$
            $endgroup$
            – Rodrigo de Azevedo
            Mar 9 at 19:26













            0












            $begingroup$

            Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)



            $$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
            $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
            $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$



            Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.



            $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$



            Putting it all together we write:



            $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$



            We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)



              $$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
              $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
              $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$



              Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.



              $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$



              Putting it all together we write:



              $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$



              We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)



                $$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
                $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
                $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$



                Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.



                $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$



                Putting it all together we write:



                $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$



                We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Suppose there are two different solutions. Suppose also that these two solutions have common $lambda$, for example $lambda_1$. Then from the very first equation it is easily seen that $lambda_4$ is also common, and so do others.That means that if there exist two solution they should contain different $lambda$'s. Denoting $lambda^{(1,2)}$ the ones from solution #1,2, we can write the following lines (substracting the equations for the first and second solution and dividing them by each other)



                $$[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]=frac{c}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
                $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]=frac{b}{c}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$
                $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=frac{d}{a}[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}]$$



                Now let's substract the last equation for the first solution from the same equation for the second.



                $$[lambda_1^{(1)} - lambda_1^{(2)}]+[lambda_2^{(1)} - lambda_2^{(2)}] +[lambda_3^{(1)} - lambda_3^{(2)}]+[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}]=0$$



                Putting it all together we write:



                $$[lambda_4^{(1)} - lambda_4^{(2)}][frac{b}{c}+frac{a}{d}+frac{c}{a}+1]=0$$



                We have previously proven that the first term cannot be zero. It means that the second is zero. But that is impossible, because one of the parameters nust be negative in this case. So we conclude that there is only one solution.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 9 at 18:14









                Ismail GadzhievIsmail Gadzhiev

                31




                31






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141369%2fshow-that-a-system-of-equations-has-a-unique-solution-and-indicate-the-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Nidaros erkebispedøme

                    Birsay

                    Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...