Strange opamp's output impedance in spiceHow to model output pin of microcontroller in SPICE?Using SPICE to...
How do I locate a classical quotation?
infinitive telling the purpose
Good allowance savings plan?
A three room house but a three headED dog
MTG: Can I kill an opponent in response to lethal activated abilities, and not take the damage?
Am I not good enough for you?
Placing subfig vertically
What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?
Can someone explain what is being said here in color publishing in the American Mathematical Monthly?
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98
Grey hair or white hair
Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?
String reversal in Python
Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?
They call me Inspector Morse
What do you call the air that rushes into your car in the highway?
Make a transparent 448*448 image
Why is there a voltage between the mains ground and my radiator?
Good for you! in Russian
Figure-8 landings on perpendicular runways
A question on the ultrafilter number
Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?
Can't find the Shader/UVs tab
Strange opamp's output impedance in spice
How to model output pin of microcontroller in SPICE?Using SPICE to model dV/dt filter for inverter motor drivesCouldn't get a 741 OPAMP to work as inverting amplifier with smaller (but not so small) resistorsImpedance matching photon detector with multiple TTL counting devicesDriving line input of a speaker from a differential amplifier, why is the output clipped?Strange AD8512A op amp behaviorWhat is a good circuit for recording a piezo contact microphone or an electric guitar pickup?How does this impedance matching circuit work? How to simulate it correctly in SPICE?Unexpected opamp outputDetermining Impedances of an Op-Amp Circuit
$begingroup$
I'm simulating this circuit in Micro-Cap, which is the clipping stage of a guitar effect. The opamp model is the "NE-5532"
I want to measure the input and the output impedance. I expected an output impedance closer to zero Ohm, and an input impedance of about 10kOhm, with an "infinite" impedance at 0Hz due to the decoupling capacitor at the input.
Here it is the analysis in Micro-Cap.
As you can see the input impedance (the blue graph) is close to what i expected, but the red graph, which is the output impedance, it's really strange. It's almost 10kOhm, with a peak of almost 1MegOhm, and i can't really explain why.
If i switch the model to a "LF-155" i get a more "reasonable" results, with an output impedance of 1.680E-68 Ohm, which is also strange.
Can you help me? This thing is driving me crazy.
operational-amplifier impedance spice input-impedance single-supply-op-amp
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm simulating this circuit in Micro-Cap, which is the clipping stage of a guitar effect. The opamp model is the "NE-5532"
I want to measure the input and the output impedance. I expected an output impedance closer to zero Ohm, and an input impedance of about 10kOhm, with an "infinite" impedance at 0Hz due to the decoupling capacitor at the input.
Here it is the analysis in Micro-Cap.
As you can see the input impedance (the blue graph) is close to what i expected, but the red graph, which is the output impedance, it's really strange. It's almost 10kOhm, with a peak of almost 1MegOhm, and i can't really explain why.
If i switch the model to a "LF-155" i get a more "reasonable" results, with an output impedance of 1.680E-68 Ohm, which is also strange.
Can you help me? This thing is driving me crazy.
operational-amplifier impedance spice input-impedance single-supply-op-amp
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm simulating this circuit in Micro-Cap, which is the clipping stage of a guitar effect. The opamp model is the "NE-5532"
I want to measure the input and the output impedance. I expected an output impedance closer to zero Ohm, and an input impedance of about 10kOhm, with an "infinite" impedance at 0Hz due to the decoupling capacitor at the input.
Here it is the analysis in Micro-Cap.
As you can see the input impedance (the blue graph) is close to what i expected, but the red graph, which is the output impedance, it's really strange. It's almost 10kOhm, with a peak of almost 1MegOhm, and i can't really explain why.
If i switch the model to a "LF-155" i get a more "reasonable" results, with an output impedance of 1.680E-68 Ohm, which is also strange.
Can you help me? This thing is driving me crazy.
operational-amplifier impedance spice input-impedance single-supply-op-amp
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm simulating this circuit in Micro-Cap, which is the clipping stage of a guitar effect. The opamp model is the "NE-5532"
I want to measure the input and the output impedance. I expected an output impedance closer to zero Ohm, and an input impedance of about 10kOhm, with an "infinite" impedance at 0Hz due to the decoupling capacitor at the input.
Here it is the analysis in Micro-Cap.
As you can see the input impedance (the blue graph) is close to what i expected, but the red graph, which is the output impedance, it's really strange. It's almost 10kOhm, with a peak of almost 1MegOhm, and i can't really explain why.
If i switch the model to a "LF-155" i get a more "reasonable" results, with an output impedance of 1.680E-68 Ohm, which is also strange.
Can you help me? This thing is driving me crazy.
operational-amplifier impedance spice input-impedance single-supply-op-amp
operational-amplifier impedance spice input-impedance single-supply-op-amp
New contributor
New contributor
edited Mar 9 at 15:40
RawCode
New contributor
asked Mar 9 at 15:31
RawCodeRawCode
194
194
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In comments you added this information,
this is a single run of the ac analysis
This method won't allow you to measure the input or output (especially the output) impedance accurately.
You need to test the output impedance by applying a source to the output with the input zero'd and vice versa. You will need two separate runs of the simulator to do this.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another thing you should keep in mind, is that both input and output impedances are defined for small signal operation.
In this case, the circuit makes use of the rectifying properties of the diodes to clip the signal.
When you run a AC analysis, spice calculates the small signal model of every non linear component and proceeds as if they were linear using said model.
But in reality you'd be expecting a non linear behavior.
I encourage you to run a transient analysis with a sine wave (for a specific frequency) and compare both results
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The opamp will have an open-loop rising Zout, looking inductive. Again, this is the OPEN LOOP Zout.
What happens with an inductor in a feedback loop? depends on the presence of capacitors and dampening resistors.
====== Here is what happens to a 45MHz OpAmp, closed-loop gain of 26dB (20X), and loaded by 1uF (1,000 nanoFarad) capacitor
Why this ringing (oscillation!) frequency, of 120,000Hz? Can we predict this?
Consider the OpAmp's R_out is 25 ohms. And Unity Gain Bandwidth is 45MHz. What inductance will have j25 ohms at 45Mhz?
1nanoHenry at 1GigaHertz is j6.3 ohms. Thus 1uH at 1GHz is j6,300 ohms. At 50MHz, the 1uH is 6,200 / 20 = j310 ohms. Our opamp, with its rising-with-frequency Zout, looks like 25ohms at 45MHz, or about 0.1uH.
Now, what is the Fring of 0.1uF and 1uF? 1uH and 1uF ring at 0.16MHz. Open Loop.
This circuit has ClosedLoop gain of 20X (26dB). With F3dB at 4.5MHz. What does this tell us?
{more later}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
RawCode is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f426387%2fstrange-opamps-output-impedance-in-spice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In comments you added this information,
this is a single run of the ac analysis
This method won't allow you to measure the input or output (especially the output) impedance accurately.
You need to test the output impedance by applying a source to the output with the input zero'd and vice versa. You will need two separate runs of the simulator to do this.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In comments you added this information,
this is a single run of the ac analysis
This method won't allow you to measure the input or output (especially the output) impedance accurately.
You need to test the output impedance by applying a source to the output with the input zero'd and vice versa. You will need two separate runs of the simulator to do this.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In comments you added this information,
this is a single run of the ac analysis
This method won't allow you to measure the input or output (especially the output) impedance accurately.
You need to test the output impedance by applying a source to the output with the input zero'd and vice versa. You will need two separate runs of the simulator to do this.
$endgroup$
In comments you added this information,
this is a single run of the ac analysis
This method won't allow you to measure the input or output (especially the output) impedance accurately.
You need to test the output impedance by applying a source to the output with the input zero'd and vice versa. You will need two separate runs of the simulator to do this.
answered Mar 9 at 16:24
The PhotonThe Photon
86.1k398198
86.1k398198
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
$begingroup$
You saved my day!
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another thing you should keep in mind, is that both input and output impedances are defined for small signal operation.
In this case, the circuit makes use of the rectifying properties of the diodes to clip the signal.
When you run a AC analysis, spice calculates the small signal model of every non linear component and proceeds as if they were linear using said model.
But in reality you'd be expecting a non linear behavior.
I encourage you to run a transient analysis with a sine wave (for a specific frequency) and compare both results
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another thing you should keep in mind, is that both input and output impedances are defined for small signal operation.
In this case, the circuit makes use of the rectifying properties of the diodes to clip the signal.
When you run a AC analysis, spice calculates the small signal model of every non linear component and proceeds as if they were linear using said model.
But in reality you'd be expecting a non linear behavior.
I encourage you to run a transient analysis with a sine wave (for a specific frequency) and compare both results
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another thing you should keep in mind, is that both input and output impedances are defined for small signal operation.
In this case, the circuit makes use of the rectifying properties of the diodes to clip the signal.
When you run a AC analysis, spice calculates the small signal model of every non linear component and proceeds as if they were linear using said model.
But in reality you'd be expecting a non linear behavior.
I encourage you to run a transient analysis with a sine wave (for a specific frequency) and compare both results
New contributor
$endgroup$
Another thing you should keep in mind, is that both input and output impedances are defined for small signal operation.
In this case, the circuit makes use of the rectifying properties of the diodes to clip the signal.
When you run a AC analysis, spice calculates the small signal model of every non linear component and proceeds as if they were linear using said model.
But in reality you'd be expecting a non linear behavior.
I encourage you to run a transient analysis with a sine wave (for a specific frequency) and compare both results
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 10 at 1:17
FrancoFranco
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The opamp will have an open-loop rising Zout, looking inductive. Again, this is the OPEN LOOP Zout.
What happens with an inductor in a feedback loop? depends on the presence of capacitors and dampening resistors.
====== Here is what happens to a 45MHz OpAmp, closed-loop gain of 26dB (20X), and loaded by 1uF (1,000 nanoFarad) capacitor
Why this ringing (oscillation!) frequency, of 120,000Hz? Can we predict this?
Consider the OpAmp's R_out is 25 ohms. And Unity Gain Bandwidth is 45MHz. What inductance will have j25 ohms at 45Mhz?
1nanoHenry at 1GigaHertz is j6.3 ohms. Thus 1uH at 1GHz is j6,300 ohms. At 50MHz, the 1uH is 6,200 / 20 = j310 ohms. Our opamp, with its rising-with-frequency Zout, looks like 25ohms at 45MHz, or about 0.1uH.
Now, what is the Fring of 0.1uF and 1uF? 1uH and 1uF ring at 0.16MHz. Open Loop.
This circuit has ClosedLoop gain of 20X (26dB). With F3dB at 4.5MHz. What does this tell us?
{more later}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The opamp will have an open-loop rising Zout, looking inductive. Again, this is the OPEN LOOP Zout.
What happens with an inductor in a feedback loop? depends on the presence of capacitors and dampening resistors.
====== Here is what happens to a 45MHz OpAmp, closed-loop gain of 26dB (20X), and loaded by 1uF (1,000 nanoFarad) capacitor
Why this ringing (oscillation!) frequency, of 120,000Hz? Can we predict this?
Consider the OpAmp's R_out is 25 ohms. And Unity Gain Bandwidth is 45MHz. What inductance will have j25 ohms at 45Mhz?
1nanoHenry at 1GigaHertz is j6.3 ohms. Thus 1uH at 1GHz is j6,300 ohms. At 50MHz, the 1uH is 6,200 / 20 = j310 ohms. Our opamp, with its rising-with-frequency Zout, looks like 25ohms at 45MHz, or about 0.1uH.
Now, what is the Fring of 0.1uF and 1uF? 1uH and 1uF ring at 0.16MHz. Open Loop.
This circuit has ClosedLoop gain of 20X (26dB). With F3dB at 4.5MHz. What does this tell us?
{more later}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The opamp will have an open-loop rising Zout, looking inductive. Again, this is the OPEN LOOP Zout.
What happens with an inductor in a feedback loop? depends on the presence of capacitors and dampening resistors.
====== Here is what happens to a 45MHz OpAmp, closed-loop gain of 26dB (20X), and loaded by 1uF (1,000 nanoFarad) capacitor
Why this ringing (oscillation!) frequency, of 120,000Hz? Can we predict this?
Consider the OpAmp's R_out is 25 ohms. And Unity Gain Bandwidth is 45MHz. What inductance will have j25 ohms at 45Mhz?
1nanoHenry at 1GigaHertz is j6.3 ohms. Thus 1uH at 1GHz is j6,300 ohms. At 50MHz, the 1uH is 6,200 / 20 = j310 ohms. Our opamp, with its rising-with-frequency Zout, looks like 25ohms at 45MHz, or about 0.1uH.
Now, what is the Fring of 0.1uF and 1uF? 1uH and 1uF ring at 0.16MHz. Open Loop.
This circuit has ClosedLoop gain of 20X (26dB). With F3dB at 4.5MHz. What does this tell us?
{more later}
$endgroup$
The opamp will have an open-loop rising Zout, looking inductive. Again, this is the OPEN LOOP Zout.
What happens with an inductor in a feedback loop? depends on the presence of capacitors and dampening resistors.
====== Here is what happens to a 45MHz OpAmp, closed-loop gain of 26dB (20X), and loaded by 1uF (1,000 nanoFarad) capacitor
Why this ringing (oscillation!) frequency, of 120,000Hz? Can we predict this?
Consider the OpAmp's R_out is 25 ohms. And Unity Gain Bandwidth is 45MHz. What inductance will have j25 ohms at 45Mhz?
1nanoHenry at 1GigaHertz is j6.3 ohms. Thus 1uH at 1GHz is j6,300 ohms. At 50MHz, the 1uH is 6,200 / 20 = j310 ohms. Our opamp, with its rising-with-frequency Zout, looks like 25ohms at 45MHz, or about 0.1uH.
Now, what is the Fring of 0.1uF and 1uF? 1uH and 1uF ring at 0.16MHz. Open Loop.
This circuit has ClosedLoop gain of 20X (26dB). With F3dB at 4.5MHz. What does this tell us?
{more later}
edited yesterday
answered Mar 10 at 2:35
analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf
15.1k2719
15.1k2719
add a comment |
add a comment |
RawCode is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RawCode is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RawCode is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
RawCode is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f426387%2fstrange-opamps-output-impedance-in-spice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You got the first two graphs from a single run of the simulator?
$endgroup$
– The Photon
Mar 9 at 15:50
$begingroup$
something's fundamentally broken with this simulator or its NE5532 model. You physically can't have an output voltage of 1 MV
$endgroup$
– Marcus Müller
Mar 9 at 15:52
$begingroup$
@ThePhoton Yes, this is a single run of the ac analysis
$endgroup$
– RawCode
Mar 9 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Is that a 10 ohm resistor from output pin to ground (R11?) The op-amp will try to maintain 4.5V across that resistor: too much DC current will flow for the op-amp (smoke would ensue). Try returning that resistor to the 4.5V supply instead of ground.
$endgroup$
– glen_geek
Mar 9 at 16:21