Closed-form of $int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm d x$ without using Laplace Transform? ...
Do warforged have souls?
What is special about square numbers here?
Arduino Pro Micro - switch off LEDs
How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
How to stretch delimiters to envolve matrices inside of a kbordermatrix?
Why did all the guest students take carriages to the Yule Ball?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?
Take groceries in checked luggage
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Wall plug outlet change
Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
How long does the line of fire that you can create as an action using the Investiture of Flame spell last?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?
Simulation of a banking system with an Account class in C++
Road tyres vs "Street" tyres for charity ride on MTB Tandem
Closed-form of $int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm d x$ without using Laplace Transform?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Evaluate $int_{-infty}^infty xexp(-x^2/2)sin(xi x) mathrm dx$Closed form expression of $int_{0}^{infty}frac{1}{(1+ax^{-alpha})^{b}}mathrm{dx}$Closed form expression of $int_{-infty}^{+infty}dx exp[-alpha(x^2-a^2)^2]$On the integral $int_{e}^{infty}frac{t^{1/2}}{log^{1/2}left(tright)}alpha^{-t/logleft(tright)}dt,,alpha>1.$How this $int_0^{a}x^text{erf(exp(-x))}dx$ behaves?Evaluation of $int_{0}^{1} (frac{1}{x}) ^{log x},mathrm dx$ which has a nice closed formClosed form of $ int_{-1}^{1} operatorname{erf}(x)^n ,dx $ for $ n$ is positive even integer$sum_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{exp(-n^2)}{1-4n^2}$ in closed form?Evaluation of :$int_0^1 frac{arctan x}{x^{1/2}sqrt{1-x^2}},mathrm{d}x$What is $lim_{ntoinfty}int_{0}^infty exp(-x^n arctan(frac1x)) dx,n>1$
$begingroup$
I want to get the closed-form of the followng integral without using Laplace Transform but I didn't succeed with $a$ is a positive real number.
$$int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm dx,$$
Wolfram alpha give me nice closed-form. Then is there any way without using Laplace Transform ?
real-analysis integration closed-form
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to get the closed-form of the followng integral without using Laplace Transform but I didn't succeed with $a$ is a positive real number.
$$int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm dx,$$
Wolfram alpha give me nice closed-form. Then is there any way without using Laplace Transform ?
real-analysis integration closed-form
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to get the closed-form of the followng integral without using Laplace Transform but I didn't succeed with $a$ is a positive real number.
$$int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm dx,$$
Wolfram alpha give me nice closed-form. Then is there any way without using Laplace Transform ?
real-analysis integration closed-form
$endgroup$
I want to get the closed-form of the followng integral without using Laplace Transform but I didn't succeed with $a$ is a positive real number.
$$int_{0}^{infty} exp {(-ax^2)}log x mathrm dx,$$
Wolfram alpha give me nice closed-form. Then is there any way without using Laplace Transform ?
real-analysis integration closed-form
real-analysis integration closed-form
edited Mar 22 at 19:05
mrtaurho
6,15271641
6,15271641
asked Mar 22 at 17:25
zeraoulia rafikzeraoulia rafik
2,39711134
2,39711134
3
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07
3
3
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We may exploit Feynman's Trick in this situation.
In order to perform the actual trick we define the following integral
$$I(s)=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
We are specifically interested in the value of $I'(-1)$ which equals your given integral. However, first of all lets evaluate the newly defined integral $I(s)$. The pretty straightforward substitution $ax^2mapsto x$ reveals
begin{align*}
I(s)&=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx\
&=int_0^infty left(frac xaright)^{frac{s+1}2}exp(-x)left[frac1{2sqrt{ax}}right]mathrm dx\
&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}int_0^infty x^{frac s2}exp(-x)mathrm dx\
therefore~I(s)&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)
end{align*}
Now we can differentiate this closed-form of $I(s)$ w.r.t. $s$ and evaluate the so gained expression at $s=-1$ which yields to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}I(s)&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)\
&=frac12left(-frac12log(a)a^{-frac s2-1}right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)+frac12a^{-frac s2-1}left[frac12psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)right]\
&=frac14a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)-log(a)right]
end{align*}
Here $psi^{(0)}(z)$ denotes the Digamma Function. Plugging in $s=-1$ finally gives
begin{align*}
I'(-1)&=frac14a^{frac12-1}Gammaleft(-frac 12+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(-frac 12+1right)-log(a)right]\
&=frac1{4sqrt a}Gammaleft(frac12right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac12right)-log(a)right]\
&=-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]
end{align*}
$$therefore~int_0^infty exp(-ax^2)log(x)mathrm dx~=~-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]$$
I will not go into detail how to obtain the values for the Gamma Function and Digamma Function, respectively, which are afterall well-known. The crucial equality, namely
$$frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty log(x)x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
Which is essentially Feynman's Trick, can be justified by the Leibniz Integral Rule, or Integration Under The Integral Sign, which allows the aforementioned procedure if certain conditions hold.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158430%2fclosed-form-of-int-0-infty-exp-ax2-log-x-mathrm-d-x-without-usin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We may exploit Feynman's Trick in this situation.
In order to perform the actual trick we define the following integral
$$I(s)=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
We are specifically interested in the value of $I'(-1)$ which equals your given integral. However, first of all lets evaluate the newly defined integral $I(s)$. The pretty straightforward substitution $ax^2mapsto x$ reveals
begin{align*}
I(s)&=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx\
&=int_0^infty left(frac xaright)^{frac{s+1}2}exp(-x)left[frac1{2sqrt{ax}}right]mathrm dx\
&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}int_0^infty x^{frac s2}exp(-x)mathrm dx\
therefore~I(s)&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)
end{align*}
Now we can differentiate this closed-form of $I(s)$ w.r.t. $s$ and evaluate the so gained expression at $s=-1$ which yields to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}I(s)&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)\
&=frac12left(-frac12log(a)a^{-frac s2-1}right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)+frac12a^{-frac s2-1}left[frac12psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)right]\
&=frac14a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)-log(a)right]
end{align*}
Here $psi^{(0)}(z)$ denotes the Digamma Function. Plugging in $s=-1$ finally gives
begin{align*}
I'(-1)&=frac14a^{frac12-1}Gammaleft(-frac 12+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(-frac 12+1right)-log(a)right]\
&=frac1{4sqrt a}Gammaleft(frac12right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac12right)-log(a)right]\
&=-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]
end{align*}
$$therefore~int_0^infty exp(-ax^2)log(x)mathrm dx~=~-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]$$
I will not go into detail how to obtain the values for the Gamma Function and Digamma Function, respectively, which are afterall well-known. The crucial equality, namely
$$frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty log(x)x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
Which is essentially Feynman's Trick, can be justified by the Leibniz Integral Rule, or Integration Under The Integral Sign, which allows the aforementioned procedure if certain conditions hold.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We may exploit Feynman's Trick in this situation.
In order to perform the actual trick we define the following integral
$$I(s)=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
We are specifically interested in the value of $I'(-1)$ which equals your given integral. However, first of all lets evaluate the newly defined integral $I(s)$. The pretty straightforward substitution $ax^2mapsto x$ reveals
begin{align*}
I(s)&=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx\
&=int_0^infty left(frac xaright)^{frac{s+1}2}exp(-x)left[frac1{2sqrt{ax}}right]mathrm dx\
&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}int_0^infty x^{frac s2}exp(-x)mathrm dx\
therefore~I(s)&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)
end{align*}
Now we can differentiate this closed-form of $I(s)$ w.r.t. $s$ and evaluate the so gained expression at $s=-1$ which yields to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}I(s)&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)\
&=frac12left(-frac12log(a)a^{-frac s2-1}right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)+frac12a^{-frac s2-1}left[frac12psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)right]\
&=frac14a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)-log(a)right]
end{align*}
Here $psi^{(0)}(z)$ denotes the Digamma Function. Plugging in $s=-1$ finally gives
begin{align*}
I'(-1)&=frac14a^{frac12-1}Gammaleft(-frac 12+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(-frac 12+1right)-log(a)right]\
&=frac1{4sqrt a}Gammaleft(frac12right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac12right)-log(a)right]\
&=-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]
end{align*}
$$therefore~int_0^infty exp(-ax^2)log(x)mathrm dx~=~-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]$$
I will not go into detail how to obtain the values for the Gamma Function and Digamma Function, respectively, which are afterall well-known. The crucial equality, namely
$$frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty log(x)x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
Which is essentially Feynman's Trick, can be justified by the Leibniz Integral Rule, or Integration Under The Integral Sign, which allows the aforementioned procedure if certain conditions hold.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We may exploit Feynman's Trick in this situation.
In order to perform the actual trick we define the following integral
$$I(s)=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
We are specifically interested in the value of $I'(-1)$ which equals your given integral. However, first of all lets evaluate the newly defined integral $I(s)$. The pretty straightforward substitution $ax^2mapsto x$ reveals
begin{align*}
I(s)&=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx\
&=int_0^infty left(frac xaright)^{frac{s+1}2}exp(-x)left[frac1{2sqrt{ax}}right]mathrm dx\
&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}int_0^infty x^{frac s2}exp(-x)mathrm dx\
therefore~I(s)&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)
end{align*}
Now we can differentiate this closed-form of $I(s)$ w.r.t. $s$ and evaluate the so gained expression at $s=-1$ which yields to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}I(s)&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)\
&=frac12left(-frac12log(a)a^{-frac s2-1}right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)+frac12a^{-frac s2-1}left[frac12psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)right]\
&=frac14a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)-log(a)right]
end{align*}
Here $psi^{(0)}(z)$ denotes the Digamma Function. Plugging in $s=-1$ finally gives
begin{align*}
I'(-1)&=frac14a^{frac12-1}Gammaleft(-frac 12+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(-frac 12+1right)-log(a)right]\
&=frac1{4sqrt a}Gammaleft(frac12right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac12right)-log(a)right]\
&=-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]
end{align*}
$$therefore~int_0^infty exp(-ax^2)log(x)mathrm dx~=~-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]$$
I will not go into detail how to obtain the values for the Gamma Function and Digamma Function, respectively, which are afterall well-known. The crucial equality, namely
$$frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty log(x)x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
Which is essentially Feynman's Trick, can be justified by the Leibniz Integral Rule, or Integration Under The Integral Sign, which allows the aforementioned procedure if certain conditions hold.
$endgroup$
We may exploit Feynman's Trick in this situation.
In order to perform the actual trick we define the following integral
$$I(s)=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
We are specifically interested in the value of $I'(-1)$ which equals your given integral. However, first of all lets evaluate the newly defined integral $I(s)$. The pretty straightforward substitution $ax^2mapsto x$ reveals
begin{align*}
I(s)&=int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx\
&=int_0^infty left(frac xaright)^{frac{s+1}2}exp(-x)left[frac1{2sqrt{ax}}right]mathrm dx\
&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}int_0^infty x^{frac s2}exp(-x)mathrm dx\
therefore~I(s)&=frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)
end{align*}
Now we can differentiate this closed-form of $I(s)$ w.r.t. $s$ and evaluate the so gained expression at $s=-1$ which yields to
begin{align*}
frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}I(s)&=frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}frac12a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)\
&=frac12left(-frac12log(a)a^{-frac s2-1}right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)+frac12a^{-frac s2-1}left[frac12psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)right]\
&=frac14a^{-frac s2-1}Gammaleft(frac s2+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac s2+1right)-log(a)right]
end{align*}
Here $psi^{(0)}(z)$ denotes the Digamma Function. Plugging in $s=-1$ finally gives
begin{align*}
I'(-1)&=frac14a^{frac12-1}Gammaleft(-frac 12+1right)left[psi^{(0)}left(-frac 12+1right)-log(a)right]\
&=frac1{4sqrt a}Gammaleft(frac12right)left[psi^{(0)}left(frac12right)-log(a)right]\
&=-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]
end{align*}
$$therefore~int_0^infty exp(-ax^2)log(x)mathrm dx~=~-frac14sqrt{fracpi a}[gamma+2log 2+log a]$$
I will not go into detail how to obtain the values for the Gamma Function and Digamma Function, respectively, which are afterall well-known. The crucial equality, namely
$$frac{mathrm d}{mathrm ds}int_0^infty x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty frac{partial}{partial s}x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx=int_0^infty log(x)x^{s+1}exp(-ax^2)mathrm dx$$
Which is essentially Feynman's Trick, can be justified by the Leibniz Integral Rule, or Integration Under The Integral Sign, which allows the aforementioned procedure if certain conditions hold.
answered Mar 22 at 18:25
mrtaurhomrtaurho
6,15271641
6,15271641
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158430%2fclosed-form-of-int-0-infty-exp-ax2-log-x-mathrm-d-x-without-usin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Could you maybe include your own work, i.e. your solution utilizing the Laplace Transform? I think this, one could say "lack of context" is why your interesting question already received a down-vote aswell as a close-vote.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Mar 22 at 19:07