Explaining Ito's Lemma The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In ...
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Searching for a differential characteristic (differential cryptanalysis)
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
Wall plug outlet change
How to delete random line from file using Unix command?
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?
Can the DM override racial traits?
Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?
What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?
does high air pressure throw off wheel balance?
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
system() function string length limit
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?
Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?
Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism
How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?
Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?
What is this lever in Argentinian toilets?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
Explaining Ito's Lemma
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Calculate $mathbb{E}(W_t^k)$ for a Brownian motion $(W_t)_{t geq0}$ using Itô's Lemmaquestion about Ito's formulaUse Ito's Lemma to show:Geometric brownian motion - Ito's lemmaIto's Isometry using Brownian MotionIto's Lemma Simple ApplicationUse Ito's Formula to prove following identityBrownian motion with Lévy’s CharacterizationPassage in Ito's Lemma proofDeriving Ito's Lemma (Informally)
$begingroup$
Find $$int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)$$ using Ito's Lemma.
Now, I know that the answer to that question is: $int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)= frac{W^2(T)}{2}-frac{T}{2}$
but can somebody explain the idea behind the Ito's Lemma by giving a formal mathematical proof of the above?
I would be grateful if someone could post any "interesting" (but not so hard) application of Ito's Lemma when it comes to the Brownian Motion.
real-analysis stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus brownian-motion martingales
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find $$int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)$$ using Ito's Lemma.
Now, I know that the answer to that question is: $int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)= frac{W^2(T)}{2}-frac{T}{2}$
but can somebody explain the idea behind the Ito's Lemma by giving a formal mathematical proof of the above?
I would be grateful if someone could post any "interesting" (but not so hard) application of Ito's Lemma when it comes to the Brownian Motion.
real-analysis stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus brownian-motion martingales
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find $$int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)$$ using Ito's Lemma.
Now, I know that the answer to that question is: $int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)= frac{W^2(T)}{2}-frac{T}{2}$
but can somebody explain the idea behind the Ito's Lemma by giving a formal mathematical proof of the above?
I would be grateful if someone could post any "interesting" (but not so hard) application of Ito's Lemma when it comes to the Brownian Motion.
real-analysis stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus brownian-motion martingales
$endgroup$
Find $$int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)$$ using Ito's Lemma.
Now, I know that the answer to that question is: $int_{0}^{T}W(t)dW(t)= frac{W^2(T)}{2}-frac{T}{2}$
but can somebody explain the idea behind the Ito's Lemma by giving a formal mathematical proof of the above?
I would be grateful if someone could post any "interesting" (but not so hard) application of Ito's Lemma when it comes to the Brownian Motion.
real-analysis stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus brownian-motion martingales
real-analysis stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus brownian-motion martingales
edited Mar 1 at 15:25
GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會
14.1k82651
14.1k82651
asked Feb 26 '17 at 9:45
user415301
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Roughly, let $f :(t,x) rightarrow f(t,x)$ from $mathbb{R^2}$ to $mathbb{R}$, a function smooth enough, classic differentiation gives $$Delta f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}Delta t+frac{partial f}{partial x}Delta x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}Delta x^2+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial t^2}Delta t^2+mathcal{O(Delta x^2)}+mathcal{O(Delta t^2)}$$
Using infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, second order terms vanish, and we write
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x$$
However, if $x$ refers now to a Brownian motion , moving to infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, $Delta t^2$ still vanishes, but $Delta x^2$ becomes $Delta t$ because of the non-nil quadratic variation of the Brownian motion. That is why you may hear that a Brownian motion is in terms of $sqrt{t}$.
Henceforth, the formula differs from the classic one as $Delta x^2$ is not negligeable anymore , and we have
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}dx^2$$
This is the Ito-formula, and $x$ can be any Ito-process, a Brownian motion being one of them.
Now regarding your exercise :
Let $W$ a Brownian motion , and $f(t,x)=x^2$. You would agree that $W$ is a Brownian motion, hence an Ito process. Furthermore $f$ is twice differentiable.
You can apply the Ito's lemma, and use that $frac{partial f}{partial t}=0$, $frac{partial f}{partial x}=2x$ and $frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}=2$.
Here $x$ refers to the Brownian motion $W$
Thus,
$$d f(t,W_t)=0d t+2W_td W_t+frac{1}{2}2dW_t^2$$
I stated before that the quadratic variation of $W$ gives that $dW_t^2=dt$. We have
$$d f(t,W_t)= 2W_td W_t+dt$$
By integration the equation , we have
$$f(T,W_T)-f(0,W_0)=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
or
$$ W_T^2=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
Finally, by switching the term in $T$ and dividing by $2$, we have what you want .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2162029%2fexplaining-itos-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Roughly, let $f :(t,x) rightarrow f(t,x)$ from $mathbb{R^2}$ to $mathbb{R}$, a function smooth enough, classic differentiation gives $$Delta f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}Delta t+frac{partial f}{partial x}Delta x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}Delta x^2+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial t^2}Delta t^2+mathcal{O(Delta x^2)}+mathcal{O(Delta t^2)}$$
Using infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, second order terms vanish, and we write
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x$$
However, if $x$ refers now to a Brownian motion , moving to infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, $Delta t^2$ still vanishes, but $Delta x^2$ becomes $Delta t$ because of the non-nil quadratic variation of the Brownian motion. That is why you may hear that a Brownian motion is in terms of $sqrt{t}$.
Henceforth, the formula differs from the classic one as $Delta x^2$ is not negligeable anymore , and we have
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}dx^2$$
This is the Ito-formula, and $x$ can be any Ito-process, a Brownian motion being one of them.
Now regarding your exercise :
Let $W$ a Brownian motion , and $f(t,x)=x^2$. You would agree that $W$ is a Brownian motion, hence an Ito process. Furthermore $f$ is twice differentiable.
You can apply the Ito's lemma, and use that $frac{partial f}{partial t}=0$, $frac{partial f}{partial x}=2x$ and $frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}=2$.
Here $x$ refers to the Brownian motion $W$
Thus,
$$d f(t,W_t)=0d t+2W_td W_t+frac{1}{2}2dW_t^2$$
I stated before that the quadratic variation of $W$ gives that $dW_t^2=dt$. We have
$$d f(t,W_t)= 2W_td W_t+dt$$
By integration the equation , we have
$$f(T,W_T)-f(0,W_0)=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
or
$$ W_T^2=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
Finally, by switching the term in $T$ and dividing by $2$, we have what you want .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roughly, let $f :(t,x) rightarrow f(t,x)$ from $mathbb{R^2}$ to $mathbb{R}$, a function smooth enough, classic differentiation gives $$Delta f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}Delta t+frac{partial f}{partial x}Delta x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}Delta x^2+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial t^2}Delta t^2+mathcal{O(Delta x^2)}+mathcal{O(Delta t^2)}$$
Using infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, second order terms vanish, and we write
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x$$
However, if $x$ refers now to a Brownian motion , moving to infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, $Delta t^2$ still vanishes, but $Delta x^2$ becomes $Delta t$ because of the non-nil quadratic variation of the Brownian motion. That is why you may hear that a Brownian motion is in terms of $sqrt{t}$.
Henceforth, the formula differs from the classic one as $Delta x^2$ is not negligeable anymore , and we have
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}dx^2$$
This is the Ito-formula, and $x$ can be any Ito-process, a Brownian motion being one of them.
Now regarding your exercise :
Let $W$ a Brownian motion , and $f(t,x)=x^2$. You would agree that $W$ is a Brownian motion, hence an Ito process. Furthermore $f$ is twice differentiable.
You can apply the Ito's lemma, and use that $frac{partial f}{partial t}=0$, $frac{partial f}{partial x}=2x$ and $frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}=2$.
Here $x$ refers to the Brownian motion $W$
Thus,
$$d f(t,W_t)=0d t+2W_td W_t+frac{1}{2}2dW_t^2$$
I stated before that the quadratic variation of $W$ gives that $dW_t^2=dt$. We have
$$d f(t,W_t)= 2W_td W_t+dt$$
By integration the equation , we have
$$f(T,W_T)-f(0,W_0)=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
or
$$ W_T^2=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
Finally, by switching the term in $T$ and dividing by $2$, we have what you want .
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roughly, let $f :(t,x) rightarrow f(t,x)$ from $mathbb{R^2}$ to $mathbb{R}$, a function smooth enough, classic differentiation gives $$Delta f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}Delta t+frac{partial f}{partial x}Delta x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}Delta x^2+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial t^2}Delta t^2+mathcal{O(Delta x^2)}+mathcal{O(Delta t^2)}$$
Using infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, second order terms vanish, and we write
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x$$
However, if $x$ refers now to a Brownian motion , moving to infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, $Delta t^2$ still vanishes, but $Delta x^2$ becomes $Delta t$ because of the non-nil quadratic variation of the Brownian motion. That is why you may hear that a Brownian motion is in terms of $sqrt{t}$.
Henceforth, the formula differs from the classic one as $Delta x^2$ is not negligeable anymore , and we have
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}dx^2$$
This is the Ito-formula, and $x$ can be any Ito-process, a Brownian motion being one of them.
Now regarding your exercise :
Let $W$ a Brownian motion , and $f(t,x)=x^2$. You would agree that $W$ is a Brownian motion, hence an Ito process. Furthermore $f$ is twice differentiable.
You can apply the Ito's lemma, and use that $frac{partial f}{partial t}=0$, $frac{partial f}{partial x}=2x$ and $frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}=2$.
Here $x$ refers to the Brownian motion $W$
Thus,
$$d f(t,W_t)=0d t+2W_td W_t+frac{1}{2}2dW_t^2$$
I stated before that the quadratic variation of $W$ gives that $dW_t^2=dt$. We have
$$d f(t,W_t)= 2W_td W_t+dt$$
By integration the equation , we have
$$f(T,W_T)-f(0,W_0)=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
or
$$ W_T^2=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
Finally, by switching the term in $T$ and dividing by $2$, we have what you want .
$endgroup$
Roughly, let $f :(t,x) rightarrow f(t,x)$ from $mathbb{R^2}$ to $mathbb{R}$, a function smooth enough, classic differentiation gives $$Delta f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}Delta t+frac{partial f}{partial x}Delta x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}Delta x^2+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial t^2}Delta t^2+mathcal{O(Delta x^2)}+mathcal{O(Delta t^2)}$$
Using infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, second order terms vanish, and we write
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x$$
However, if $x$ refers now to a Brownian motion , moving to infinitesimal $Delta x$ and $Delta t$, $Delta t^2$ still vanishes, but $Delta x^2$ becomes $Delta t$ because of the non-nil quadratic variation of the Brownian motion. That is why you may hear that a Brownian motion is in terms of $sqrt{t}$.
Henceforth, the formula differs from the classic one as $Delta x^2$ is not negligeable anymore , and we have
$$d f(t,x)=frac{partial f}{partial t}d t+frac{partial f}{partial x}d x+frac{1}{2}frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}dx^2$$
This is the Ito-formula, and $x$ can be any Ito-process, a Brownian motion being one of them.
Now regarding your exercise :
Let $W$ a Brownian motion , and $f(t,x)=x^2$. You would agree that $W$ is a Brownian motion, hence an Ito process. Furthermore $f$ is twice differentiable.
You can apply the Ito's lemma, and use that $frac{partial f}{partial t}=0$, $frac{partial f}{partial x}=2x$ and $frac{partial^2 f}{partial x^2}=2$.
Here $x$ refers to the Brownian motion $W$
Thus,
$$d f(t,W_t)=0d t+2W_td W_t+frac{1}{2}2dW_t^2$$
I stated before that the quadratic variation of $W$ gives that $dW_t^2=dt$. We have
$$d f(t,W_t)= 2W_td W_t+dt$$
By integration the equation , we have
$$f(T,W_T)-f(0,W_0)=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
or
$$ W_T^2=2int_{0}^{T}{W_tdW_t}+T$$
Finally, by switching the term in $T$ and dividing by $2$, we have what you want .
answered Feb 27 '17 at 21:08
CanardiniCanardini
2,5001519
2,5001519
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2162029%2fexplaining-itos-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown