What is a linear isomorphism between $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and...

Simulating Exploding Dice

Do warforged have souls?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

How does ice melt when immersed in water?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

What is special about square numbers here?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

system() function string length limit

Sort a list of pairs representing an acyclic, partial automorphism

Derivation tree not rendering

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

Wolves and sheep

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?



What is a linear isomorphism between $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$? [closed]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Isomorphism between $mathbb{C} X otimes mathbb{C} X$ and $mathbb{C} (X times X)$Are $mathbb{C} otimes _mathbb{R} mathbb{C}$ and $mathbb{C} otimes _mathbb{C} mathbb{C}$ isomorphic as $mathbb{R}$-vector spaces?Isomorphism between symmetric and upper triangular matricesTensor Algebra and IsomorphismIsomorphism between $U$ and $mathbb R^n$Natural Isomorphism between $V^*otimes W^*$ and $mathcal L^2(V,W; F)$.Commuting of Hom and Tensor Product functors?Oh Times, $otimes$ in linear algebra and tensorsNatural isomorphism between $V otimes V$ and bilinear forms on $V^*$.How to construct a $k[G]$ isomorphism $W^G otimes V cong (W otimes V_H)^G$.












0












$begingroup$


What is a linear isomorphism between
$underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$?



Where $ntimes m :={(i,j):0le n-1,0le j le m-1}$.



Since $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ consists of $nm$ copies of $mathbb{R}$ it has dimension $nm$. Also $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ has dimension $nm$. Hence they must be isomorphic as vector spaces.



Now what is a map $psi:underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ that gives this isomorphism?



So what is $psi(w_{i,j})$? Where $w_{i,j}:ntimes m rightarrow mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Matthew Towers, Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Mar 26 at 3:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick
    Mar 22 at 20:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 22 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 22 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your both right; I replaced it by a
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 22 at 21:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – csprun
    Mar 22 at 21:18


















0












$begingroup$


What is a linear isomorphism between
$underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$?



Where $ntimes m :={(i,j):0le n-1,0le j le m-1}$.



Since $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ consists of $nm$ copies of $mathbb{R}$ it has dimension $nm$. Also $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ has dimension $nm$. Hence they must be isomorphic as vector spaces.



Now what is a map $psi:underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ that gives this isomorphism?



So what is $psi(w_{i,j})$? Where $w_{i,j}:ntimes m rightarrow mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Matthew Towers, Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Mar 26 at 3:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick
    Mar 22 at 20:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 22 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 22 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your both right; I replaced it by a
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 22 at 21:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – csprun
    Mar 22 at 21:18
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


What is a linear isomorphism between
$underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$?



Where $ntimes m :={(i,j):0le n-1,0le j le m-1}$.



Since $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ consists of $nm$ copies of $mathbb{R}$ it has dimension $nm$. Also $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ has dimension $nm$. Hence they must be isomorphic as vector spaces.



Now what is a map $psi:underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ that gives this isomorphism?



So what is $psi(w_{i,j})$? Where $w_{i,j}:ntimes m rightarrow mathbb{R}$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is a linear isomorphism between
$underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$?



Where $ntimes m :={(i,j):0le n-1,0le j le m-1}$.



Since $underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}$ consists of $nm$ copies of $mathbb{R}$ it has dimension $nm$. Also $mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ has dimension $nm$. Hence they must be isomorphic as vector spaces.



Now what is a map $psi:underset{ntimes m}{times} mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}^notimesmathbb{R}^m$ that gives this isomorphism?



So what is $psi(w_{i,j})$? Where $w_{i,j}:ntimes m rightarrow mathbb{R}$.







linear-algebra vector-spaces tensor-products tensors multilinear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 21:10







Jens Wagemaker

















asked Mar 22 at 20:39









Jens WagemakerJens Wagemaker

593312




593312




closed as off-topic by Matthew Towers, Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Mar 26 at 3:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Matthew Towers, Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel Mar 26 at 3:26


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Alex Provost, Leucippus, Shailesh, Parcly Taxel

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick
    Mar 22 at 20:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 22 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 22 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your both right; I replaced it by a
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 22 at 21:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – csprun
    Mar 22 at 21:18
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick
    Mar 22 at 20:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 22 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
    $endgroup$
    – Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
    Mar 22 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your both right; I replaced it by a
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 22 at 21:10






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – csprun
    Mar 22 at 21:18










2




2




$begingroup$
If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Mar 22 at 20:53




$begingroup$
If $v_i$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n$ and $w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^m$, then $v_i otimes w_j$ are a basis of $Bbb{R}^n otimes Bbb{R}^m$. So just order these $v_1 otimes w_1$, $v_1 otimes w_2$, ..., etc, and map these to the basis vectors of $Bbb{R}^{mn}$.
$endgroup$
– Nick
Mar 22 at 20:53




1




1




$begingroup$
You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 22 at 21:08




$begingroup$
You say "the linear isomorphism". Note that "the" is the singular definite article, and implies uniqueness: there is one linear isomorphism, or there is a prefered linear isomorphism. There is no such thing here; you should ask for " a linear isomorphism".
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 22 at 21:08




1




1




$begingroup$
The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 22 at 21:09




$begingroup$
The map is the wrong question. Trivially, there are many linear isomorphisms between both spaces because have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Mar 22 at 21:09












$begingroup$
Your both right; I replaced it by a
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 22 at 21:10




$begingroup$
Your both right; I replaced it by a
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 22 at 21:10




1




1




$begingroup$
Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
$endgroup$
– csprun
Mar 22 at 21:18






$begingroup$
Are you thinking of $times_{ntimes m}mathbb{R}$ as the vector space of linear maps $mathbb{R}^m to mathbb{R}^n$? If so, there is a natural isomorphism $text{Hom}_F(V,W) to Wotimes V^*$ for any finite-dimensional $F$-vector spaces $V,W$, which may be more satisfying than choosing two arbitrary bases and identifying them. Of course, you'll need to choose bases to identify linear maps with matrices in the end.
$endgroup$
– csprun
Mar 22 at 21:18












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let ${e_1^n, dots, e_n^n}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^n$ and ${e_1^m, dots, e_m^m}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^m$.



Then a basis of $mathbb{R}^n otimes mathbb{R}^m$ is given by ${e_i^n otimes e_j^m: 0 le i le n-1, 0 le j le m -1 }$.



We define $psi(w_{i,j}) = sum_{i,j}w_{i,j} ; e_i^n otimes e_j^m$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let ${e_1^n, dots, e_n^n}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^n$ and ${e_1^m, dots, e_m^m}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^m$.



    Then a basis of $mathbb{R}^n otimes mathbb{R}^m$ is given by ${e_i^n otimes e_j^m: 0 le i le n-1, 0 le j le m -1 }$.



    We define $psi(w_{i,j}) = sum_{i,j}w_{i,j} ; e_i^n otimes e_j^m$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let ${e_1^n, dots, e_n^n}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^n$ and ${e_1^m, dots, e_m^m}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^m$.



      Then a basis of $mathbb{R}^n otimes mathbb{R}^m$ is given by ${e_i^n otimes e_j^m: 0 le i le n-1, 0 le j le m -1 }$.



      We define $psi(w_{i,j}) = sum_{i,j}w_{i,j} ; e_i^n otimes e_j^m$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let ${e_1^n, dots, e_n^n}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^n$ and ${e_1^m, dots, e_m^m}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^m$.



        Then a basis of $mathbb{R}^n otimes mathbb{R}^m$ is given by ${e_i^n otimes e_j^m: 0 le i le n-1, 0 le j le m -1 }$.



        We define $psi(w_{i,j}) = sum_{i,j}w_{i,j} ; e_i^n otimes e_j^m$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let ${e_1^n, dots, e_n^n}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^n$ and ${e_1^m, dots, e_m^m}$ be the standard basis on $mathbb{R}^m$.



        Then a basis of $mathbb{R}^n otimes mathbb{R}^m$ is given by ${e_i^n otimes e_j^m: 0 le i le n-1, 0 le j le m -1 }$.



        We define $psi(w_{i,j}) = sum_{i,j}w_{i,j} ; e_i^n otimes e_j^m$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 22 at 21:23









        Jens WagemakerJens Wagemaker

        593312




        593312















            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...