Valuation ring, of infinite global dimension, with principal maximal ideal The 2019 Stack...

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

does high air pressure throw off wheel balance?

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

Simulating Exploding Dice

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Derivation tree not rendering

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

What do you call a plan that's an alternative plan in case your initial plan fails?

How to split app screen on my Mac?

Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

What does the torsion-free condition for a connection mean in terms of its horizontal bundle?

Make it rain characters

How long does the line of fire that you can create as an action using the Investiture of Flame spell last?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

Python - Fishing Simulator

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?



Valuation ring, of infinite global dimension, with principal maximal ideal



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Weak Global Dimension and Global DimensionProjective dimension of the residue field of a noetherian local ring.Dimension of quotients of a discrete valuation domainLocal Noetherian domain of dimension one with principal maximal idealGlobal Dimension of a Ring and its LocalizationsLocalization of a valuation ring at a prime is abstractly isomorphic to the original ringValuation ring and localization.Almost a discrete valuation ringGlobal dimension of $prod k$Valuation ring of finite Krull dimension whose every non-maximal ideal is principal












1












$begingroup$


Does there exist a Valuation ring $(R, mathfrak m)$ , with principal maximal ideal, of infinite global dimension ?



Corollary 2 of the following paper by Osofsky has an example of Valuation ring of infinite global dimension. But I'm not sure whether we can also construct such example with principal maximal ideal.



Please help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Does there exist a Valuation ring $(R, mathfrak m)$ , with principal maximal ideal, of infinite global dimension ?



    Corollary 2 of the following paper by Osofsky has an example of Valuation ring of infinite global dimension. But I'm not sure whether we can also construct such example with principal maximal ideal.



    Please help










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      2



      $begingroup$


      Does there exist a Valuation ring $(R, mathfrak m)$ , with principal maximal ideal, of infinite global dimension ?



      Corollary 2 of the following paper by Osofsky has an example of Valuation ring of infinite global dimension. But I'm not sure whether we can also construct such example with principal maximal ideal.



      Please help










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Does there exist a Valuation ring $(R, mathfrak m)$ , with principal maximal ideal, of infinite global dimension ?



      Corollary 2 of the following paper by Osofsky has an example of Valuation ring of infinite global dimension. But I'm not sure whether we can also construct such example with principal maximal ideal.



      Please help







      commutative-algebra homological-algebra valuation-theory global-dimension






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 23 at 13:16









      Andrés E. Caicedo

      66k8160252




      66k8160252










      asked Mar 22 at 22:23









      user521337user521337

      1,2201417




      1,2201417






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The example of a valuation domain of infinite global dimension Barbara Osofsky gives is a generalized power series ring $k[[Gamma]]$ with a well-chosen ordered abelian group $Gamma$. But as far as I see the residue field $k$ can be chosen arbitrarily. Hence one can take any field $k$, that carries a discrete valuation ring $overline{O}subset k$. Let $Osubset k[[Gamma]]$ be the preimage of $overline{O}$ under the natural homomorphism $k[[Gamma]]rightarrow k$. Then $O$ is a valuation ring of the fraction field of $k[[Gamma]]$ and $k[[Gamma]]$ is a localization of $O$. Consequently $O$ must have infinite global dimension, since global dimension decreases under localization. On the other side the maximal ideal of $O$ is generated by any preimage of a generator of the maximal ideal of $overline{O}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Mar 24 at 0:40










          • $begingroup$
            To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen Knaf
            Mar 24 at 9:41














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158739%2fvaluation-ring-of-infinite-global-dimension-with-principal-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          The example of a valuation domain of infinite global dimension Barbara Osofsky gives is a generalized power series ring $k[[Gamma]]$ with a well-chosen ordered abelian group $Gamma$. But as far as I see the residue field $k$ can be chosen arbitrarily. Hence one can take any field $k$, that carries a discrete valuation ring $overline{O}subset k$. Let $Osubset k[[Gamma]]$ be the preimage of $overline{O}$ under the natural homomorphism $k[[Gamma]]rightarrow k$. Then $O$ is a valuation ring of the fraction field of $k[[Gamma]]$ and $k[[Gamma]]$ is a localization of $O$. Consequently $O$ must have infinite global dimension, since global dimension decreases under localization. On the other side the maximal ideal of $O$ is generated by any preimage of a generator of the maximal ideal of $overline{O}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Mar 24 at 0:40










          • $begingroup$
            To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen Knaf
            Mar 24 at 9:41


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The example of a valuation domain of infinite global dimension Barbara Osofsky gives is a generalized power series ring $k[[Gamma]]$ with a well-chosen ordered abelian group $Gamma$. But as far as I see the residue field $k$ can be chosen arbitrarily. Hence one can take any field $k$, that carries a discrete valuation ring $overline{O}subset k$. Let $Osubset k[[Gamma]]$ be the preimage of $overline{O}$ under the natural homomorphism $k[[Gamma]]rightarrow k$. Then $O$ is a valuation ring of the fraction field of $k[[Gamma]]$ and $k[[Gamma]]$ is a localization of $O$. Consequently $O$ must have infinite global dimension, since global dimension decreases under localization. On the other side the maximal ideal of $O$ is generated by any preimage of a generator of the maximal ideal of $overline{O}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Mar 24 at 0:40










          • $begingroup$
            To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen Knaf
            Mar 24 at 9:41
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The example of a valuation domain of infinite global dimension Barbara Osofsky gives is a generalized power series ring $k[[Gamma]]$ with a well-chosen ordered abelian group $Gamma$. But as far as I see the residue field $k$ can be chosen arbitrarily. Hence one can take any field $k$, that carries a discrete valuation ring $overline{O}subset k$. Let $Osubset k[[Gamma]]$ be the preimage of $overline{O}$ under the natural homomorphism $k[[Gamma]]rightarrow k$. Then $O$ is a valuation ring of the fraction field of $k[[Gamma]]$ and $k[[Gamma]]$ is a localization of $O$. Consequently $O$ must have infinite global dimension, since global dimension decreases under localization. On the other side the maximal ideal of $O$ is generated by any preimage of a generator of the maximal ideal of $overline{O}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The example of a valuation domain of infinite global dimension Barbara Osofsky gives is a generalized power series ring $k[[Gamma]]$ with a well-chosen ordered abelian group $Gamma$. But as far as I see the residue field $k$ can be chosen arbitrarily. Hence one can take any field $k$, that carries a discrete valuation ring $overline{O}subset k$. Let $Osubset k[[Gamma]]$ be the preimage of $overline{O}$ under the natural homomorphism $k[[Gamma]]rightarrow k$. Then $O$ is a valuation ring of the fraction field of $k[[Gamma]]$ and $k[[Gamma]]$ is a localization of $O$. Consequently $O$ must have infinite global dimension, since global dimension decreases under localization. On the other side the maximal ideal of $O$ is generated by any preimage of a generator of the maximal ideal of $overline{O}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 23 at 3:33









          Hagen KnafHagen Knaf

          6,9521318




          6,9521318












          • $begingroup$
            I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Mar 24 at 0:40










          • $begingroup$
            To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen Knaf
            Mar 24 at 9:41




















          • $begingroup$
            I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
            $endgroup$
            – user521337
            Mar 24 at 0:40










          • $begingroup$
            To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
            $endgroup$
            – Hagen Knaf
            Mar 24 at 9:41


















          $begingroup$
          I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Mar 24 at 0:40




          $begingroup$
          I'm quite not sure why $O$ is a Valuation ring ... why are the ideals linearly ordered ?
          $endgroup$
          – user521337
          Mar 24 at 0:40












          $begingroup$
          To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
          $endgroup$
          – Hagen Knaf
          Mar 24 at 9:41






          $begingroup$
          To check that $O$ is a valuation ring one verifies that either $xin O$ or $x^{-1}in O$ for every $xin k((Gamma))$. So assume $xnotin O$. Case 1: $xnotin k[[Gamma]]$. Then $x^{-1}$ is in the maximal ideal of $k[[Gamma]]$, which is the preimage of $0$ under the natural map. Hence $x^{-1}in O$. Case 2: $xin k[[Gamma]]$. Then the image $overline{x}$ of $x$ is not in $overline{O}$ and thus $overline{x}^{-1}inoverline{O}$. Consequently $x^{-1}in O$. (Remark: in valuation theory $O$ is called the composite valuation ring of $overline{O}$ and $k[[Gamma]]$).
          $endgroup$
          – Hagen Knaf
          Mar 24 at 9:41




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158739%2fvaluation-ring-of-infinite-global-dimension-with-principal-maximal-ideal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Nidaros erkebispedøme

          Birsay

          Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...