Is it true that all symmetric matrices have eigenbasis?Symmetric MatricesSymmetric matrix is always...
Does this AnyDice function accurately calculate the number of ogres you make unconcious with three 4th-level castings of Sleep?
Did CPM support custom hardware using device drivers?
The use of "touch" and "touch on" in context
Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Science-fiction short story where space navy wanted hospital ships and settlers had guns mounted everywhere
Bash: What does "masking return values" mean?
Why are there 40 737 Max planes in flight when they have been grounded as not airworthy?
Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?
Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets
When do we add an hyphen (-) to a complex adjective word?
At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?
Rules about breaking the rules. How do I do it well?
Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?
Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths
Is it possible that AIC = BIC?
Can anyone tell me why this program fails?
Can elves maintain concentration in a trance?
Bash replace string at multiple places in a file from command line
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
Counting certain elements in lists
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
An Accountant Seeks the Help of a Mathematician
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
Is it true that all symmetric matrices have eigenbasis?
Symmetric MatricesSymmetric matrix is always diagonalizable?How to find a mutually orthogonal basis for symmetric matrices where 2 of the eigenvectors are equalFinding orthonormal eigenvectors of symmetric matricesComplex symmetric matrix orthogonal eigenvectorsProving symmetric matrices are diagonalizable using fact eigenvectors must be orthogonalwhy symmetric matrix is always diagonalizable even when it has repeated eigenvalues?Do Real Symmetric Matrices have 'n' linearly independent eigenvectors?Eigenvalues, orthonormal eigenvectorsProof for why symmetric matrices are only orthogonally diagonalizable
$begingroup$
I know that a symmetric matrix has a set of orthogonal eigenvectors if all its eigenvalues are distinct. As far as I know, their eigenvalues might not be distinct. However, some sources claim that symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis.
I know that we can get orthonormal basis using Gram Schmidt on the eigenvectors of each basis. However, I don't think that it guarantees the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors. Shouldn't the Gram Schmidt process turns the eigenvectors into non eigenvectors? If not how to prove that the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors?
So, my question then is if symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis regardless of whether its eigenvalues are distinct? Best if a calculus-free proof for whether or not symmetric matrices have eigenbasis can be given.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality symmetric-matrices
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that a symmetric matrix has a set of orthogonal eigenvectors if all its eigenvalues are distinct. As far as I know, their eigenvalues might not be distinct. However, some sources claim that symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis.
I know that we can get orthonormal basis using Gram Schmidt on the eigenvectors of each basis. However, I don't think that it guarantees the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors. Shouldn't the Gram Schmidt process turns the eigenvectors into non eigenvectors? If not how to prove that the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors?
So, my question then is if symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis regardless of whether its eigenvalues are distinct? Best if a calculus-free proof for whether or not symmetric matrices have eigenbasis can be given.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality symmetric-matrices
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that a symmetric matrix has a set of orthogonal eigenvectors if all its eigenvalues are distinct. As far as I know, their eigenvalues might not be distinct. However, some sources claim that symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis.
I know that we can get orthonormal basis using Gram Schmidt on the eigenvectors of each basis. However, I don't think that it guarantees the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors. Shouldn't the Gram Schmidt process turns the eigenvectors into non eigenvectors? If not how to prove that the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors?
So, my question then is if symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis regardless of whether its eigenvalues are distinct? Best if a calculus-free proof for whether or not symmetric matrices have eigenbasis can be given.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality symmetric-matrices
$endgroup$
I know that a symmetric matrix has a set of orthogonal eigenvectors if all its eigenvalues are distinct. As far as I know, their eigenvalues might not be distinct. However, some sources claim that symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis.
I know that we can get orthonormal basis using Gram Schmidt on the eigenvectors of each basis. However, I don't think that it guarantees the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors. Shouldn't the Gram Schmidt process turns the eigenvectors into non eigenvectors? If not how to prove that the resultant vectors are still eigenvectors?
So, my question then is if symmetric matrices always have eigenbasis regardless of whether its eigenvalues are distinct? Best if a calculus-free proof for whether or not symmetric matrices have eigenbasis can be given.
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality symmetric-matrices
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors orthogonality symmetric-matrices
edited Nov 17 '17 at 5:45
user10024395
asked Nov 16 '17 at 17:29
user10024395user10024395
1
1
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, each real symmetric matrices is orthogonaly equivalent to a diagonal matrix. In other words, you can find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. This is the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, a symmetric matrix always has an eigenbasis: as an $n times n$ symmetric matrix always has $n$ eigenvectors (spectral theorem), which can be made orthogonal by the Gram-Schmidt theorem. This proves that the eigenbasis doesn't depend on repeated or distinct eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2523375%2fis-it-true-that-all-symmetric-matrices-have-eigenbasis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, each real symmetric matrices is orthogonaly equivalent to a diagonal matrix. In other words, you can find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. This is the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, each real symmetric matrices is orthogonaly equivalent to a diagonal matrix. In other words, you can find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. This is the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, each real symmetric matrices is orthogonaly equivalent to a diagonal matrix. In other words, you can find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. This is the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices.
$endgroup$
Yes, each real symmetric matrices is orthogonaly equivalent to a diagonal matrix. In other words, you can find an orthonormal basis of eigenvectors. This is the spectral theorem for symmetric matrices.
answered Nov 16 '17 at 17:35
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
167k22132235
167k22132235
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, a symmetric matrix always has an eigenbasis: as an $n times n$ symmetric matrix always has $n$ eigenvectors (spectral theorem), which can be made orthogonal by the Gram-Schmidt theorem. This proves that the eigenbasis doesn't depend on repeated or distinct eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, a symmetric matrix always has an eigenbasis: as an $n times n$ symmetric matrix always has $n$ eigenvectors (spectral theorem), which can be made orthogonal by the Gram-Schmidt theorem. This proves that the eigenbasis doesn't depend on repeated or distinct eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, a symmetric matrix always has an eigenbasis: as an $n times n$ symmetric matrix always has $n$ eigenvectors (spectral theorem), which can be made orthogonal by the Gram-Schmidt theorem. This proves that the eigenbasis doesn't depend on repeated or distinct eigenvalues.
$endgroup$
Yes, a symmetric matrix always has an eigenbasis: as an $n times n$ symmetric matrix always has $n$ eigenvectors (spectral theorem), which can be made orthogonal by the Gram-Schmidt theorem. This proves that the eigenbasis doesn't depend on repeated or distinct eigenvalues.
edited Mar 10 at 14:16
Glorfindel
3,42981830
3,42981830
answered Mar 10 at 13:59
Kanika RajainKanika Rajain
246
246
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2523375%2fis-it-true-that-all-symmetric-matrices-have-eigenbasis%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is true over reals. The proof is simple: find some eigenvector (it exists) v and continue by induction on $v^perp$ (which is $A$-invariant by the symmetry of $A$)
$endgroup$
– Peter Franek
Nov 16 '17 at 17:47