Solving $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $x$ in general for some values of $a$ and $n$.How to determine if a polynomial...

Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Why do compilers behave differently when static_cast(ing) a function to void*?

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

What is this called? Old film camera viewer?

Create all possible words using a set or letters

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

In Qur'an 7:161, why is "say the word of humility" translated in various ways?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed

I am looking for the correct translation of love for the phrase "in this sign love"

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Non-trope happy ending?

Why do we read the Megillah by night and by day?

Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

It grows, but water kills it



Solving $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $x$ in general for some values of $a$ and $n$.


How to determine if a polynomial is of a particular order: 3rd degree (cubic), 4th degree (quartic) etc.Solving Yoshida equationsSolving $y^2 - yx - y + x = 0$ for $y$?Let $f(x)=7x^{32}+5x^{22}+3x^{12}+x^2$. Find the remainder when $x^2+1$ divides $f(x)$ and $xf(x)$.Find the values of $p$ where two lines intersectSolving a pair of quadratic equations for two unknowns efficientlySolving $x^4-15x^2-10x+ 24 = 0$ using Ferrari’s methodIf $(x+1)(x+3)(x+5)(x+7)= 5760$, what are the possible values of $x$?Solving polynomial equations by decompositionthe roots of the equation $ax^2 +bx+c=0$ are $alpha$ and $beta$ find an equation with roots $alpha + beta$ and $alpha beta$.













0












$begingroup$


I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    Mar 14 at 0:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 0:37










  • $begingroup$
    Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Mar 14 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26
















0












$begingroup$


I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    Mar 14 at 0:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 0:37










  • $begingroup$
    Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Mar 14 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.







polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 14 at 0:44









Rócherz

2,9863821




2,9863821










asked Mar 14 at 0:08









Andrew MarkovicAndrew Markovic

32




32












  • $begingroup$
    For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    Mar 14 at 0:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 0:37










  • $begingroup$
    Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Mar 14 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26


















  • $begingroup$
    For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
    $endgroup$
    – herb steinberg
    Mar 14 at 0:22










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 0:37










  • $begingroup$
    Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
    $endgroup$
    – zongxiang yi
    Mar 14 at 6:17










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26
















$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22




$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22












$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37




$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37












$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17




$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17












$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26




$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.



If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.



To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$



Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$
which is the solution for six significant figures.



If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26










  • $begingroup$
    @AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Mar 14 at 14:27













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147380%2fsolving-1-x-1-axn-for-x-in-general-for-some-values-of-a-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.



If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.



To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$



Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$
which is the solution for six significant figures.



If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26










  • $begingroup$
    @AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Mar 14 at 14:27


















0












$begingroup$

Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.



If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.



To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$



Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$
which is the solution for six significant figures.



If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26










  • $begingroup$
    @AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Mar 14 at 14:27
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.



If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.



To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$



Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$
which is the solution for six significant figures.



If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.



If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.



To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$



Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$
which is the solution for six significant figures.



If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 14 at 7:04









Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

124k1158135




124k1158135












  • $begingroup$
    That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26










  • $begingroup$
    @AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Mar 14 at 14:27




















  • $begingroup$
    That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Markovic
    Mar 14 at 12:26










  • $begingroup$
    @AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Mar 14 at 14:27


















$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26




$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26












$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27






$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147380%2fsolving-1-x-1-axn-for-x-in-general-for-some-values-of-a-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...