Solving $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $x$ in general for some values of $a$ and $n$.How to determine if a polynomial...
Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?
Why do compilers behave differently when static_cast(ing) a function to void*?
Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?
Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)
The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
What is this called? Old film camera viewer?
Create all possible words using a set or letters
Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country
How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?
In Qur'an 7:161, why is "say the word of humility" translated in various ways?
What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?
Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?
When were female captains banned from Starfleet?
On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?
Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?
Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed
I am looking for the correct translation of love for the phrase "in this sign love"
Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?
Non-trope happy ending?
Why do we read the Megillah by night and by day?
Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?
Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?
It grows, but water kills it
Solving $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $x$ in general for some values of $a$ and $n$.
How to determine if a polynomial is of a particular order: 3rd degree (cubic), 4th degree (quartic) etc.Solving Yoshida equationsSolving $y^2 - yx - y + x = 0$ for $y$?Let $f(x)=7x^{32}+5x^{22}+3x^{12}+x^2$. Find the remainder when $x^2+1$ divides $f(x)$ and $xf(x)$.Find the values of $p$ where two lines intersectSolving a pair of quadratic equations for two unknowns efficientlySolving $x^4-15x^2-10x+ 24 = 0$ using Ferrari’s methodIf $(x+1)(x+3)(x+5)(x+7)= 5760$, what are the possible values of $x$?Solving polynomial equations by decompositionthe roots of the equation $ax^2 +bx+c=0$ are $alpha$ and $beta$ find an equation with roots $alpha + beta$ and $alpha beta$.
$begingroup$
I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.
polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.
polynomials
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.
polynomials
$endgroup$
I have an equation of the form $1-x = (1-ax)^n$ for $0<a<1$ and some value $n in mathbb{N}$. When substituting in the values I have for $a$ and $n$ (which are $a=0.002$ and $n=2999$ I cannot seem to solve the equation. So I tried writing it in a more general form to see if there was anything I could do with that, but I cannot think of anything. The only way I can seem to get an answer is by graphing both sides and looking where they intersect, but this is not accurate (it gives $x=1$ as a solution). Is there a trick when solving equations like this? Thank you for all your help.
polynomials
polynomials
edited Mar 14 at 0:44
Rócherz
2,9863821
2,9863821
asked Mar 14 at 0:08
Andrew MarkovicAndrew Markovic
32
32
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.
If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.
To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$
Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$ which is the solution for six significant figures.
If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147380%2fsolving-1-x-1-axn-for-x-in-general-for-some-values-of-a-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.
If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.
To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$
Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$ which is the solution for six significant figures.
If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.
If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.
To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$
Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$ which is the solution for six significant figures.
If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.
If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.
To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$
Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$ which is the solution for six significant figures.
If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.
$endgroup$
Consider that you look for the zero of function $$f(x)=1-x - (1-ax)^n$$ Assuming that $n$ is a positive integer $n > 1$, this represents a polynomial of degree $n$ which cannot be solved if $n>4$. So, you need either numerical methods (such as Newton) or approximations.
If you consider the derivatives
$$f'(x)=a n (1-a x)^{n-1}-1$$
$$f''(x)=-a^2 (n-1) n (1-a x)^{n-2}$$ the first derivative cancels at
$$x_*=frac{1-left(frac{1}{a n}right)^{frac{1}{n-1}}}{a}$$ and notice that $f(0)=0$. So, assuming that this is a minimum and that $f(x_*)<0$, ther is a root which is $ > x_*$.
To get a first approximation, you could build a Taylor series around $x=x_*$ to get
$$f(x)=f(x_*)+frac 12 f''(x_*)(x-x_*)^2+O((x-x_*)^3)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms, get an estimate
$$x_0=x_*+sqrt{-2frac{f(x_*)}{f''(x_*)}}$$
Appliead to the case $a=0.002$, $n=2999$, this would give $x_0 approx 0.721$ and, using this Newton iterates would be
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.720871 \
1 & 1.009707 \
2 & 0.997500 \
3 & 0.997494
end{array}
right)$$ which is the solution for six significant figures.
If you know that the solution is close to $x=1$, you could expand $f(x)$ as a Taylor series at $x=1$ and get
$$f(x)=-(1-a)^n+(x-1) left(a n (1-a)^{n-1}-1right)+Oleft((x-1)^2right)$$ Using the first term only would give
$$x=1+frac{(1-a)^{n+1}}{a n (1-a)^n+a-1}$$ which, for the worked example, would immediately give $x=0.997494$.
answered Mar 14 at 7:04
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
124k1158135
124k1158135
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
That makes perfect sense, thank you your response.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
$begingroup$
@AndrewMarkovic. I am sorry ! I did not notice that you are a very new user : so, Welcome to the site ! I thank you for the problem; it is interesting and I had fun wtih it. I think that we could make better : could you tell the practical ranges of interest for $a$ and $n$ ? Cheers :-)
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Mar 14 at 14:27
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147380%2fsolving-1-x-1-axn-for-x-in-general-for-some-values-of-a-and-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For x=1, the left side =0, while the right side is extremely small (.000006), so graph isn't too far off.
$endgroup$
– herb steinberg
Mar 14 at 0:22
$begingroup$
Thank you for your quick response. I accidently mis-wrote the equation as per update. I can solve this using Wolfram and I get $x=0.9975$. The value for $x$ is a ratio so I need to find an exact value for it.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 0:37
$begingroup$
Obviously, $x=0$ is a solution. And it seems that the equation has no algebraic solution by Abel–Ruffini theorem (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel%E2%80%93Ruffini_theorem ). You can only get the numerical solutions by iterative methods (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_analysis ) most of the time which is implemented by mathematical software, such as Wolfram and matlab.
$endgroup$
– zongxiang yi
Mar 14 at 6:17
$begingroup$
Thank you for mentioning this Theorem I didn't realise this applied to the problem.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Markovic
Mar 14 at 12:26