If $S subseteq X$ is closed, is $f(S,r)$ necessarily closed?In a metric space, is the dilation of a closed...

Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

Where did Heinlein say "Once you get to Earth orbit, you're halfway to anywhere in the Solar System"?

Start making guitar arrangements

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

Longest common substring in linear time

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Does the expansion of the universe explain why the universe doesn't collapse?

Character escape sequences for ">"

Question about the proof of Second Isomorphism Theorem

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

250 Floor Tower

Multiplicative persistence

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

Is it possible to have a strip of cold climate in the middle of a planet?

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

why `nmap 192.168.1.97` returns less services than `nmap 127.0.0.1`?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

What should you do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?



If $S subseteq X$ is closed, is $f(S,r)$ necessarily closed?


In a metric space, is the dilation of a closed set closed?In a normed vector space, if $S⊆X$ is closed, is $f(S,r)$ necessarily closed?Determine if the set $C ={ frac{1}{n}|n in mathbb{N} }$ is open or closed in the euclidian metricShow that $D ={ x + y mid x in (0,1) ,y in [1,2) }$ is open or closedDoes “uniformly isolated” imply closed?Show that $F subseteq X$ is closed iff $F cap K$ is closed for every compact set $Ksubseteq X$A non-empty closed proper set in a metric spaceDoes it follow that ${ (x,y) in Xtimes X mid d(x,y) < m } subseteq U$?Closed ball is a closed setTopology - Infinite intersection of closed and connected sets.Does $partial B(x_0, r) subseteq {x in X : d(x_0,x) = r }$ hold in an arbitrary metric space?$epsilon$ fattening of an open set needn't be open













3












$begingroup$


Let $X$ denote a metric space.



Whenever $S subseteq X$ and $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, write $f(S,r)$ for the following set.



$${x in X mid exists s in S : d(x,s) leq r}$$




Question. Given a closed set $S subseteq X$ and any $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, does it follow that $f(S,r)$ is closed?




If not, a counterexample $(X,S,r)$ would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ denote a metric space.



    Whenever $S subseteq X$ and $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, write $f(S,r)$ for the following set.



    $${x in X mid exists s in S : d(x,s) leq r}$$




    Question. Given a closed set $S subseteq X$ and any $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, does it follow that $f(S,r)$ is closed?




    If not, a counterexample $(X,S,r)$ would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ denote a metric space.



      Whenever $S subseteq X$ and $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, write $f(S,r)$ for the following set.



      $${x in X mid exists s in S : d(x,s) leq r}$$




      Question. Given a closed set $S subseteq X$ and any $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, does it follow that $f(S,r)$ is closed?




      If not, a counterexample $(X,S,r)$ would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ denote a metric space.



      Whenever $S subseteq X$ and $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, write $f(S,r)$ for the following set.



      $${x in X mid exists s in S : d(x,s) leq r}$$




      Question. Given a closed set $S subseteq X$ and any $r in mathbb{R}_{geq 0}$, does it follow that $f(S,r)$ is closed?




      If not, a counterexample $(X,S,r)$ would be appreciated.







      metric-spaces examples-counterexamples






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 5 '14 at 12:40







      goblin

















      asked Aug 3 '14 at 7:28









      goblingoblin

      37.1k1159193




      37.1k1159193






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The answer is no.



          Let $S={1-frac{1}{n}}_{n=1}^infty$. Let $X$ be the set $Scup [1.5,2]$ with its subspace metric. Then $f(S,1)=Scup [1.5,2)$ is not closed in $X$ since it is not of the form $Ccap X$ for some closed set $C$ of the reals.



          We indeed see that $S$ is not a compact subset of $X$, in align with William's result.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            3












            $begingroup$

            If in addition $C$ is compact, then the following proof shows $f(C,r)$ is closed for each positive real number $r$.



            Suppose $z$ is a limit point of $f(C,r)$. For all $n$, find some $x_n in f(C,r)$ and $c_n in C$ such that $d(x_n, c_n) leq r$ and $d(x_n, z) leq frac{1}{n}$. Hence by the triangle inequality, $d(z, c_n) leq r + frac{1}{n}$. By sequential compactness, there is a subsequence of ${c_n : n in omega}$ which converges. To avoid notation, let just suppose the subsequence was just ${c_n : n in omega}$ and it coverges to the point $c$. Since $C$ is closed, $c in C$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Choose $N$ large such that for all $m > N$, $d(c, c_m) < frac{epsilon}{2}$ and $frac{1}{N} < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then $d(z,c) leq r + d(z, c_m) + d(c_m, c) = r + frac{1}{m} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{1}{N} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = r + epsilon$. Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, $d(z,c) leq r$. Hence $z in f(C,r)$.



            This seems to show that if $C$ is a compact set, then $f(C,r)$ is closed. At the moment, I am not sure whether or not being just closed is enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
              $endgroup$
              – goblin
              Aug 3 '14 at 9:34










            • $begingroup$
              @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
              $endgroup$
              – William
              Aug 3 '14 at 9:37











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f886091%2fif-s-subseteq-x-is-closed-is-fs-r-necessarily-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The answer is no.



            Let $S={1-frac{1}{n}}_{n=1}^infty$. Let $X$ be the set $Scup [1.5,2]$ with its subspace metric. Then $f(S,1)=Scup [1.5,2)$ is not closed in $X$ since it is not of the form $Ccap X$ for some closed set $C$ of the reals.



            We indeed see that $S$ is not a compact subset of $X$, in align with William's result.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              The answer is no.



              Let $S={1-frac{1}{n}}_{n=1}^infty$. Let $X$ be the set $Scup [1.5,2]$ with its subspace metric. Then $f(S,1)=Scup [1.5,2)$ is not closed in $X$ since it is not of the form $Ccap X$ for some closed set $C$ of the reals.



              We indeed see that $S$ is not a compact subset of $X$, in align with William's result.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The answer is no.



                Let $S={1-frac{1}{n}}_{n=1}^infty$. Let $X$ be the set $Scup [1.5,2]$ with its subspace metric. Then $f(S,1)=Scup [1.5,2)$ is not closed in $X$ since it is not of the form $Ccap X$ for some closed set $C$ of the reals.



                We indeed see that $S$ is not a compact subset of $X$, in align with William's result.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The answer is no.



                Let $S={1-frac{1}{n}}_{n=1}^infty$. Let $X$ be the set $Scup [1.5,2]$ with its subspace metric. Then $f(S,1)=Scup [1.5,2)$ is not closed in $X$ since it is not of the form $Ccap X$ for some closed set $C$ of the reals.



                We indeed see that $S$ is not a compact subset of $X$, in align with William's result.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 3 '14 at 10:47









                Robert WolfeRobert Wolfe

                5,98422763




                5,98422763























                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    If in addition $C$ is compact, then the following proof shows $f(C,r)$ is closed for each positive real number $r$.



                    Suppose $z$ is a limit point of $f(C,r)$. For all $n$, find some $x_n in f(C,r)$ and $c_n in C$ such that $d(x_n, c_n) leq r$ and $d(x_n, z) leq frac{1}{n}$. Hence by the triangle inequality, $d(z, c_n) leq r + frac{1}{n}$. By sequential compactness, there is a subsequence of ${c_n : n in omega}$ which converges. To avoid notation, let just suppose the subsequence was just ${c_n : n in omega}$ and it coverges to the point $c$. Since $C$ is closed, $c in C$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Choose $N$ large such that for all $m > N$, $d(c, c_m) < frac{epsilon}{2}$ and $frac{1}{N} < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then $d(z,c) leq r + d(z, c_m) + d(c_m, c) = r + frac{1}{m} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{1}{N} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = r + epsilon$. Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, $d(z,c) leq r$. Hence $z in f(C,r)$.



                    This seems to show that if $C$ is a compact set, then $f(C,r)$ is closed. At the moment, I am not sure whether or not being just closed is enough.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – goblin
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:34










                    • $begingroup$
                      @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                      $endgroup$
                      – William
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:37
















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    If in addition $C$ is compact, then the following proof shows $f(C,r)$ is closed for each positive real number $r$.



                    Suppose $z$ is a limit point of $f(C,r)$. For all $n$, find some $x_n in f(C,r)$ and $c_n in C$ such that $d(x_n, c_n) leq r$ and $d(x_n, z) leq frac{1}{n}$. Hence by the triangle inequality, $d(z, c_n) leq r + frac{1}{n}$. By sequential compactness, there is a subsequence of ${c_n : n in omega}$ which converges. To avoid notation, let just suppose the subsequence was just ${c_n : n in omega}$ and it coverges to the point $c$. Since $C$ is closed, $c in C$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Choose $N$ large such that for all $m > N$, $d(c, c_m) < frac{epsilon}{2}$ and $frac{1}{N} < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then $d(z,c) leq r + d(z, c_m) + d(c_m, c) = r + frac{1}{m} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{1}{N} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = r + epsilon$. Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, $d(z,c) leq r$. Hence $z in f(C,r)$.



                    This seems to show that if $C$ is a compact set, then $f(C,r)$ is closed. At the moment, I am not sure whether or not being just closed is enough.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – goblin
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:34










                    • $begingroup$
                      @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                      $endgroup$
                      – William
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:37














                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    If in addition $C$ is compact, then the following proof shows $f(C,r)$ is closed for each positive real number $r$.



                    Suppose $z$ is a limit point of $f(C,r)$. For all $n$, find some $x_n in f(C,r)$ and $c_n in C$ such that $d(x_n, c_n) leq r$ and $d(x_n, z) leq frac{1}{n}$. Hence by the triangle inequality, $d(z, c_n) leq r + frac{1}{n}$. By sequential compactness, there is a subsequence of ${c_n : n in omega}$ which converges. To avoid notation, let just suppose the subsequence was just ${c_n : n in omega}$ and it coverges to the point $c$. Since $C$ is closed, $c in C$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Choose $N$ large such that for all $m > N$, $d(c, c_m) < frac{epsilon}{2}$ and $frac{1}{N} < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then $d(z,c) leq r + d(z, c_m) + d(c_m, c) = r + frac{1}{m} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{1}{N} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = r + epsilon$. Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, $d(z,c) leq r$. Hence $z in f(C,r)$.



                    This seems to show that if $C$ is a compact set, then $f(C,r)$ is closed. At the moment, I am not sure whether or not being just closed is enough.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    If in addition $C$ is compact, then the following proof shows $f(C,r)$ is closed for each positive real number $r$.



                    Suppose $z$ is a limit point of $f(C,r)$. For all $n$, find some $x_n in f(C,r)$ and $c_n in C$ such that $d(x_n, c_n) leq r$ and $d(x_n, z) leq frac{1}{n}$. Hence by the triangle inequality, $d(z, c_n) leq r + frac{1}{n}$. By sequential compactness, there is a subsequence of ${c_n : n in omega}$ which converges. To avoid notation, let just suppose the subsequence was just ${c_n : n in omega}$ and it coverges to the point $c$. Since $C$ is closed, $c in C$. Let $epsilon > 0$. Choose $N$ large such that for all $m > N$, $d(c, c_m) < frac{epsilon}{2}$ and $frac{1}{N} < frac{epsilon}{2}$. Then $d(z,c) leq r + d(z, c_m) + d(c_m, c) = r + frac{1}{m} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{1}{N} + frac{epsilon}{2} leq r + frac{epsilon}{2} + frac{epsilon}{2} = r + epsilon$. Since $epsilon$ is arbitrary, $d(z,c) leq r$. Hence $z in f(C,r)$.



                    This seems to show that if $C$ is a compact set, then $f(C,r)$ is closed. At the moment, I am not sure whether or not being just closed is enough.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Aug 3 '14 at 8:02









                    WilliamWilliam

                    17.3k22256




                    17.3k22256












                    • $begingroup$
                      Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – goblin
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:34










                    • $begingroup$
                      @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                      $endgroup$
                      – William
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:37


















                    • $begingroup$
                      Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – goblin
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:34










                    • $begingroup$
                      @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                      $endgroup$
                      – William
                      Aug 3 '14 at 9:37
















                    $begingroup$
                    Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – goblin
                    Aug 3 '14 at 9:34




                    $begingroup$
                    Nice. So if $X = mathbb{R}^n$, then whenever $C subseteq X$ is compact, so too is $f(C,r),$ for all $r geq 0$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – goblin
                    Aug 3 '14 at 9:34












                    $begingroup$
                    @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                    $endgroup$
                    – William
                    Aug 3 '14 at 9:37




                    $begingroup$
                    @goblin Yes. Note that I only showed $f(C,r)$ is closed. However if you are in $mathbb{R}^n$, compactness is equivalent to being closed and bounded. Hence in this case the set is indeed compact.
                    $endgroup$
                    – William
                    Aug 3 '14 at 9:37


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f886091%2fif-s-subseteq-x-is-closed-is-fs-r-necessarily-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Nidaros erkebispedøme

                    Birsay

                    Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...