How would 10 generations of living underground change the human body?Is there a list of worldbuilding resources?Architectural encoding of mapsHow could a human civilization have happened to live underground, in Antarctica?Would a black population whiten over generations because of living underground?How would my dwarves tell time underground?Could human beings evolve to have longer gestation periods? If so, how could this be done?What If Earth Had an Equatorial RidgeHow many generations to lock in androgynous human characteristics?What would a medieval war against a subterranean race look like?How do dwarves defend their City-under-the-Mountain from a dragon?How long can a human stand to be underground?

Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?

Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer

Rivers without rain

Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

Why does Mind Blank stop the Feeblemind spell?

Critique of timeline aesthetic

What is the philosophical significance of speech acts/implicature?

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

How to display Aura JS Errors Lightning Out

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

Checks user level and limit the data before saving it to mongoDB

Classification of surfaces

Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int

555 timer FM transmitter

Is it idiomatic to construct against `this`

How to have a sharp product image?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

Aliens crash on Earth and go into stasis to wait for technology to fix their ship

"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context

Can an Area of Effect spell cast outside a Prismatic Wall extend inside it?

Relationship between strut and baselineskip

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?



How would 10 generations of living underground change the human body?


Is there a list of worldbuilding resources?Architectural encoding of mapsHow could a human civilization have happened to live underground, in Antarctica?Would a black population whiten over generations because of living underground?How would my dwarves tell time underground?Could human beings evolve to have longer gestation periods? If so, how could this be done?What If Earth Had an Equatorial RidgeHow many generations to lock in androgynous human characteristics?What would a medieval war against a subterranean race look like?How do dwarves defend their City-under-the-Mountain from a dragon?How long can a human stand to be underground?













7












$begingroup$


In my country, we are split down the center by an intensely large mountain range. Us desert people live on the eastern half of the country, while on the other side of the mountain range the forest people live. Although we are separate for most of the year, every winter we are forced by brutal winter storms into the mountain caves.



200 years ago, a third group of people, the ones who built out the caves and made the central trade tunnel from east to west, suddenly disappeared. Just as they started to fade from memory, there has been an increase in reports of attacks on caravans journeying through the tunnels. It has been suggested that the attacks have been more brutal then the standard highway pirate fare, only a single survivor had managed to escape but without water he died in the tunnels.



It is becoming clear that the attacks were carried out by the lost people, but we have little to no idea of what they even look like. How would 10 generations of living underground with no light, sourcing all foods from things grown and found underground, and a societal focus on digging tunnels change the human body?



Edit: To specify I am not expecting much evolutionary change. What I am expecting is that living in those conditions will result in a body that does not look like a surface dweller. Most obvious would be the pale skin. Not an evolutionary trait, but a product of the environment that changes the population's body. The lost people have developed massive fungi that reproduce quickly and have a high caloric value, so starvation is not an issue for the lost people still associated with the main pack. And technology is equal to that of 14th century Europe, with significantly more metallurgy knowledge. The best answer will focus on physical changes based on living in a cave and less on the evolution of the species.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
    $endgroup$
    – kingledion
    9 hours ago















7












$begingroup$


In my country, we are split down the center by an intensely large mountain range. Us desert people live on the eastern half of the country, while on the other side of the mountain range the forest people live. Although we are separate for most of the year, every winter we are forced by brutal winter storms into the mountain caves.



200 years ago, a third group of people, the ones who built out the caves and made the central trade tunnel from east to west, suddenly disappeared. Just as they started to fade from memory, there has been an increase in reports of attacks on caravans journeying through the tunnels. It has been suggested that the attacks have been more brutal then the standard highway pirate fare, only a single survivor had managed to escape but without water he died in the tunnels.



It is becoming clear that the attacks were carried out by the lost people, but we have little to no idea of what they even look like. How would 10 generations of living underground with no light, sourcing all foods from things grown and found underground, and a societal focus on digging tunnels change the human body?



Edit: To specify I am not expecting much evolutionary change. What I am expecting is that living in those conditions will result in a body that does not look like a surface dweller. Most obvious would be the pale skin. Not an evolutionary trait, but a product of the environment that changes the population's body. The lost people have developed massive fungi that reproduce quickly and have a high caloric value, so starvation is not an issue for the lost people still associated with the main pack. And technology is equal to that of 14th century Europe, with significantly more metallurgy knowledge. The best answer will focus on physical changes based on living in a cave and less on the evolution of the species.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
    $endgroup$
    – kingledion
    9 hours ago













7












7








7





$begingroup$


In my country, we are split down the center by an intensely large mountain range. Us desert people live on the eastern half of the country, while on the other side of the mountain range the forest people live. Although we are separate for most of the year, every winter we are forced by brutal winter storms into the mountain caves.



200 years ago, a third group of people, the ones who built out the caves and made the central trade tunnel from east to west, suddenly disappeared. Just as they started to fade from memory, there has been an increase in reports of attacks on caravans journeying through the tunnels. It has been suggested that the attacks have been more brutal then the standard highway pirate fare, only a single survivor had managed to escape but without water he died in the tunnels.



It is becoming clear that the attacks were carried out by the lost people, but we have little to no idea of what they even look like. How would 10 generations of living underground with no light, sourcing all foods from things grown and found underground, and a societal focus on digging tunnels change the human body?



Edit: To specify I am not expecting much evolutionary change. What I am expecting is that living in those conditions will result in a body that does not look like a surface dweller. Most obvious would be the pale skin. Not an evolutionary trait, but a product of the environment that changes the population's body. The lost people have developed massive fungi that reproduce quickly and have a high caloric value, so starvation is not an issue for the lost people still associated with the main pack. And technology is equal to that of 14th century Europe, with significantly more metallurgy knowledge. The best answer will focus on physical changes based on living in a cave and less on the evolution of the species.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In my country, we are split down the center by an intensely large mountain range. Us desert people live on the eastern half of the country, while on the other side of the mountain range the forest people live. Although we are separate for most of the year, every winter we are forced by brutal winter storms into the mountain caves.



200 years ago, a third group of people, the ones who built out the caves and made the central trade tunnel from east to west, suddenly disappeared. Just as they started to fade from memory, there has been an increase in reports of attacks on caravans journeying through the tunnels. It has been suggested that the attacks have been more brutal then the standard highway pirate fare, only a single survivor had managed to escape but without water he died in the tunnels.



It is becoming clear that the attacks were carried out by the lost people, but we have little to no idea of what they even look like. How would 10 generations of living underground with no light, sourcing all foods from things grown and found underground, and a societal focus on digging tunnels change the human body?



Edit: To specify I am not expecting much evolutionary change. What I am expecting is that living in those conditions will result in a body that does not look like a surface dweller. Most obvious would be the pale skin. Not an evolutionary trait, but a product of the environment that changes the population's body. The lost people have developed massive fungi that reproduce quickly and have a high caloric value, so starvation is not an issue for the lost people still associated with the main pack. And technology is equal to that of 14th century Europe, with significantly more metallurgy knowledge. The best answer will focus on physical changes based on living in a cave and less on the evolution of the species.







earth-like genetics humanoid underground






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







Alex

















asked 11 hours ago









AlexAlex

16711




16711







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
    $endgroup$
    – kingledion
    9 hours ago












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    11 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
    $endgroup$
    – kingledion
    9 hours ago







5




5




$begingroup$
The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
The Dutch went to South Africa at the beginning of the 17th century, some 400 years or 12 to 16 generations ago. Their descendants look just like any other Dutch people, maybe just a little bit more massive.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
11 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
$endgroup$
– dsollen
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure 10 generation is enough to have the people change drastically enough to make them unrecognizable, but that depends highly on how strong the evolutionary pressures were, in other words, how many died horrible due to living in caves. If your implying they chose to live in the caves of their own free will presumably they didn't have their population decimated (or worse) after they moved to the caves? I need to know how/why they entered the caves and what technology/magic they used to make the caves liveable to suggest the evolutionary affects.
$endgroup$
– dsollen
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
$endgroup$
– dsollen
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
I would say realistically the population would be cut down to a fraction of it's original numbers if forced to live in caves exclusively, mostly due to starvation because the human body needs more calories then can easily be gotten in a comparatively barren cave system. If your going to be realistic and show the kind of mass starvation and significant deaths having to survive without access to the outside world would offer then that could have enough of an affect to change them in 10 generations; but it would beg the question why they would ever choose to live in caves to start with.
$endgroup$
– dsollen
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
@dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
$endgroup$
– Alex
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@dsollen the Lost People were drawn into the depths because as they dig deeper the song of their main god gets louder. The evolutionary effects are close to null, it's more of the nurture side effects then the nature that would create the most visible change I think
$endgroup$
– Alex
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
$endgroup$
– kingledion
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AlexP Underground is more different from deserts/forests than South Africa is from Holland.
$endgroup$
– kingledion
9 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

You want a fast change on the evolutionary timescale? Here is one:



Think of blind people. Those who were born normal, and lost their eyesight later in life. Soon, their other senses take over to make-up for the loss. Some blind people may even develop echolocation abilities as shown here:



https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/blind-man-echolocation/story?id=13684073



Now, imagine how developed is that echolocation compared to bats. Well, not much, but an evolutionary starting point does exist. If the talent becomes integral part of mate selection, evolution will do its part. Other senses, such as smell and vibrations through the tunnel walls (Infrasonic hearing included) are helpful. Something like a cross between a man, a bat and a mole.



Food: That's where your plot may fail. Use a cave echology. Chemosynthesis or other non-light energy sources found in caves may give you a good thing to hold on. You have a few:



Chemosynthesis -- the cave dwellers may have found a cave that is fed by some sulfides from sulfurous springs. The movile cave in Romania, cut-off from the outside world for millions of years has its own energy source from sulfurous springs that feed a complete ecosystem. The cave men must find a way to harvest what grows there without being poisoned. They may be more resistants as a result, though not necessarily being able to dwell the spring on a permanent basis.
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave



Radioactivity like near a Uranium ore deposit, your fungus absorbs radioactive elements to use instead of photosynthesis. It can be a mushroom, if you want, since this fungus seems to do that:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus



Water Ah! Most important. Aquifers!



Other changes -- The need to dig-out and enhance the tunnels may favor the short and stocky physique.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Nothing they did not see after year 1, except some eyesight issues you will see after generation 1 that will disappear in generation 11.



    The only changes you will see is the same ones people saw a year after living underground, pale skin from lack of sunlight and vitamin D deficiency for the same reason. Malnutrition and tiny population because isolated caves have abysmal production (surviving 10 generations is unrealistic). Eyesight will be the big issue, generation 2-10 will never use their sight, they will not even know what it is, and will have to learn to see when they return to the surface. They will also not have any depth perception, that develops early and only with sight, but as someone without it that will not have much effect.



    10 generations is not enough time for any noticeable physical evolutionary changes no matter how strong the pressure, especially in something social like humans. The bottleneck caused by who was trapped will have a much bigger effect.



    Cultural changes will be large, they will not know many things, and there will likely be strong shifts in language due to lack of sight, basically you have a blind culture that can suddenly see (poorly at first).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
      $endgroup$
      – dsollen
      10 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
      $endgroup$
      – StephenG
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      7 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
      $endgroup$
      – Darrel Hoffman
      7 hours ago


















    1












    $begingroup$

    10 generations is a long time... I think they would have started to fade into memory about 8 generations ago lol but anyway:



    Species that only live inside caves are known as troglobites. Troglobites have a few distinct adaptations. They may have developed an ability to use food more efficiently by slowing their metabolism. They maybe have developed anophthalmia or a loss of eyesight or an efficiency in low-light. They may also have devloped depigmentation of the skin. Some creatures may develop extra chemical and tactile sensory organs to make up for loss of visual stimuli. Keep in mind they may not actually be troglobites they could just be troglophile's. Troglophile's have the ability to live both in and outside of caves.



    So for your cave dwelling humans I am imagining a semi-loss of hearing, eyesight and skin pigmentation. They are most likely getting shorter and more stocky. They could be developing hunched backs and hardened skin. They are perhaps even developing extra sensory organs such as antennae.



    EDIT: Based on others insights I would have to agree that 10 generations is not going to be long enough a period of time to see any significant evolutionary changes such as antennae.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex
      11 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      11 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Alex
      10 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      7 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob
      6 hours ago



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Everyone so far has focused in on the idea that evolutionary changes can't happen in the span of 10 generations, but there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest the epigenetic traits can change within one individual's lifetime.
    https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/exposure-to-cold-temperatures-can-change-our-gene-expression-and-fat-cells/



    So I'd say you could have just about any changes you wanted - they naturally produce more Vitamin A and have sharp low-light vision - but maybe get easily stunned by bright lights.



    They grow to shorter heights, their skin is tougher - the nails of their hands and feet have grown thicker and stronger.



    The ability to sense temperature, pressure, and moisture has been enhanced.



    You name it, you can probably justify it.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
      $endgroup$
      – Liam Morris
      3 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145777%2fhow-would-10-generations-of-living-underground-change-the-human-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    You want a fast change on the evolutionary timescale? Here is one:



    Think of blind people. Those who were born normal, and lost their eyesight later in life. Soon, their other senses take over to make-up for the loss. Some blind people may even develop echolocation abilities as shown here:



    https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/blind-man-echolocation/story?id=13684073



    Now, imagine how developed is that echolocation compared to bats. Well, not much, but an evolutionary starting point does exist. If the talent becomes integral part of mate selection, evolution will do its part. Other senses, such as smell and vibrations through the tunnel walls (Infrasonic hearing included) are helpful. Something like a cross between a man, a bat and a mole.



    Food: That's where your plot may fail. Use a cave echology. Chemosynthesis or other non-light energy sources found in caves may give you a good thing to hold on. You have a few:



    Chemosynthesis -- the cave dwellers may have found a cave that is fed by some sulfides from sulfurous springs. The movile cave in Romania, cut-off from the outside world for millions of years has its own energy source from sulfurous springs that feed a complete ecosystem. The cave men must find a way to harvest what grows there without being poisoned. They may be more resistants as a result, though not necessarily being able to dwell the spring on a permanent basis.
    http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave



    Radioactivity like near a Uranium ore deposit, your fungus absorbs radioactive elements to use instead of photosynthesis. It can be a mushroom, if you want, since this fungus seems to do that:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus



    Water Ah! Most important. Aquifers!



    Other changes -- The need to dig-out and enhance the tunnels may favor the short and stocky physique.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      You want a fast change on the evolutionary timescale? Here is one:



      Think of blind people. Those who were born normal, and lost their eyesight later in life. Soon, their other senses take over to make-up for the loss. Some blind people may even develop echolocation abilities as shown here:



      https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/blind-man-echolocation/story?id=13684073



      Now, imagine how developed is that echolocation compared to bats. Well, not much, but an evolutionary starting point does exist. If the talent becomes integral part of mate selection, evolution will do its part. Other senses, such as smell and vibrations through the tunnel walls (Infrasonic hearing included) are helpful. Something like a cross between a man, a bat and a mole.



      Food: That's where your plot may fail. Use a cave echology. Chemosynthesis or other non-light energy sources found in caves may give you a good thing to hold on. You have a few:



      Chemosynthesis -- the cave dwellers may have found a cave that is fed by some sulfides from sulfurous springs. The movile cave in Romania, cut-off from the outside world for millions of years has its own energy source from sulfurous springs that feed a complete ecosystem. The cave men must find a way to harvest what grows there without being poisoned. They may be more resistants as a result, though not necessarily being able to dwell the spring on a permanent basis.
      http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave



      Radioactivity like near a Uranium ore deposit, your fungus absorbs radioactive elements to use instead of photosynthesis. It can be a mushroom, if you want, since this fungus seems to do that:
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus



      Water Ah! Most important. Aquifers!



      Other changes -- The need to dig-out and enhance the tunnels may favor the short and stocky physique.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        You want a fast change on the evolutionary timescale? Here is one:



        Think of blind people. Those who were born normal, and lost their eyesight later in life. Soon, their other senses take over to make-up for the loss. Some blind people may even develop echolocation abilities as shown here:



        https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/blind-man-echolocation/story?id=13684073



        Now, imagine how developed is that echolocation compared to bats. Well, not much, but an evolutionary starting point does exist. If the talent becomes integral part of mate selection, evolution will do its part. Other senses, such as smell and vibrations through the tunnel walls (Infrasonic hearing included) are helpful. Something like a cross between a man, a bat and a mole.



        Food: That's where your plot may fail. Use a cave echology. Chemosynthesis or other non-light energy sources found in caves may give you a good thing to hold on. You have a few:



        Chemosynthesis -- the cave dwellers may have found a cave that is fed by some sulfides from sulfurous springs. The movile cave in Romania, cut-off from the outside world for millions of years has its own energy source from sulfurous springs that feed a complete ecosystem. The cave men must find a way to harvest what grows there without being poisoned. They may be more resistants as a result, though not necessarily being able to dwell the spring on a permanent basis.
        http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave



        Radioactivity like near a Uranium ore deposit, your fungus absorbs radioactive elements to use instead of photosynthesis. It can be a mushroom, if you want, since this fungus seems to do that:
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus



        Water Ah! Most important. Aquifers!



        Other changes -- The need to dig-out and enhance the tunnels may favor the short and stocky physique.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You want a fast change on the evolutionary timescale? Here is one:



        Think of blind people. Those who were born normal, and lost their eyesight later in life. Soon, their other senses take over to make-up for the loss. Some blind people may even develop echolocation abilities as shown here:



        https://abcnews.go.com/Health/MindMoodNews/blind-man-echolocation/story?id=13684073



        Now, imagine how developed is that echolocation compared to bats. Well, not much, but an evolutionary starting point does exist. If the talent becomes integral part of mate selection, evolution will do its part. Other senses, such as smell and vibrations through the tunnel walls (Infrasonic hearing included) are helpful. Something like a cross between a man, a bat and a mole.



        Food: That's where your plot may fail. Use a cave echology. Chemosynthesis or other non-light energy sources found in caves may give you a good thing to hold on. You have a few:



        Chemosynthesis -- the cave dwellers may have found a cave that is fed by some sulfides from sulfurous springs. The movile cave in Romania, cut-off from the outside world for millions of years has its own energy source from sulfurous springs that feed a complete ecosystem. The cave men must find a way to harvest what grows there without being poisoned. They may be more resistants as a result, though not necessarily being able to dwell the spring on a permanent basis.
        http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave



        Radioactivity like near a Uranium ore deposit, your fungus absorbs radioactive elements to use instead of photosynthesis. It can be a mushroom, if you want, since this fungus seems to do that:
        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus



        Water Ah! Most important. Aquifers!



        Other changes -- The need to dig-out and enhance the tunnels may favor the short and stocky physique.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        Christmas SnowChristmas Snow

        3,112318




        3,112318





















            2












            $begingroup$

            Nothing they did not see after year 1, except some eyesight issues you will see after generation 1 that will disappear in generation 11.



            The only changes you will see is the same ones people saw a year after living underground, pale skin from lack of sunlight and vitamin D deficiency for the same reason. Malnutrition and tiny population because isolated caves have abysmal production (surviving 10 generations is unrealistic). Eyesight will be the big issue, generation 2-10 will never use their sight, they will not even know what it is, and will have to learn to see when they return to the surface. They will also not have any depth perception, that develops early and only with sight, but as someone without it that will not have much effect.



            10 generations is not enough time for any noticeable physical evolutionary changes no matter how strong the pressure, especially in something social like humans. The bottleneck caused by who was trapped will have a much bigger effect.



            Cultural changes will be large, they will not know many things, and there will likely be strong shifts in language due to lack of sight, basically you have a blind culture that can suddenly see (poorly at first).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
              $endgroup$
              – dsollen
              10 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
              $endgroup$
              – StephenG
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            Nothing they did not see after year 1, except some eyesight issues you will see after generation 1 that will disappear in generation 11.



            The only changes you will see is the same ones people saw a year after living underground, pale skin from lack of sunlight and vitamin D deficiency for the same reason. Malnutrition and tiny population because isolated caves have abysmal production (surviving 10 generations is unrealistic). Eyesight will be the big issue, generation 2-10 will never use their sight, they will not even know what it is, and will have to learn to see when they return to the surface. They will also not have any depth perception, that develops early and only with sight, but as someone without it that will not have much effect.



            10 generations is not enough time for any noticeable physical evolutionary changes no matter how strong the pressure, especially in something social like humans. The bottleneck caused by who was trapped will have a much bigger effect.



            Cultural changes will be large, they will not know many things, and there will likely be strong shifts in language due to lack of sight, basically you have a blind culture that can suddenly see (poorly at first).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
              $endgroup$
              – dsollen
              10 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
              $endgroup$
              – StephenG
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Nothing they did not see after year 1, except some eyesight issues you will see after generation 1 that will disappear in generation 11.



            The only changes you will see is the same ones people saw a year after living underground, pale skin from lack of sunlight and vitamin D deficiency for the same reason. Malnutrition and tiny population because isolated caves have abysmal production (surviving 10 generations is unrealistic). Eyesight will be the big issue, generation 2-10 will never use their sight, they will not even know what it is, and will have to learn to see when they return to the surface. They will also not have any depth perception, that develops early and only with sight, but as someone without it that will not have much effect.



            10 generations is not enough time for any noticeable physical evolutionary changes no matter how strong the pressure, especially in something social like humans. The bottleneck caused by who was trapped will have a much bigger effect.



            Cultural changes will be large, they will not know many things, and there will likely be strong shifts in language due to lack of sight, basically you have a blind culture that can suddenly see (poorly at first).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Nothing they did not see after year 1, except some eyesight issues you will see after generation 1 that will disappear in generation 11.



            The only changes you will see is the same ones people saw a year after living underground, pale skin from lack of sunlight and vitamin D deficiency for the same reason. Malnutrition and tiny population because isolated caves have abysmal production (surviving 10 generations is unrealistic). Eyesight will be the big issue, generation 2-10 will never use their sight, they will not even know what it is, and will have to learn to see when they return to the surface. They will also not have any depth perception, that develops early and only with sight, but as someone without it that will not have much effect.



            10 generations is not enough time for any noticeable physical evolutionary changes no matter how strong the pressure, especially in something social like humans. The bottleneck caused by who was trapped will have a much bigger effect.



            Cultural changes will be large, they will not know many things, and there will likely be strong shifts in language due to lack of sight, basically you have a blind culture that can suddenly see (poorly at first).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            JohnJohn

            36.6k1048122




            36.6k1048122











            • $begingroup$
              I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
              $endgroup$
              – dsollen
              10 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
              $endgroup$
              – StephenG
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
              $endgroup$
              – dsollen
              10 hours ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
              $endgroup$
              – StephenG
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
              $endgroup$
              – Darrel Hoffman
              7 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
            $endgroup$
            – dsollen
            10 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I agree mostly with you. However, I'd argue living in a cave would kill so many in the first few generation if one was realistic that it would put a far more drastic evolutionary pressure on these people then is normally seen, enough to drive more rapid adaptation, most noticeably shrinking physical size to cut back on caloric intake. The problem is a realistic depiction of the difficulty of surviving in caves would have everyone dead, so depicting a lethal enough lifestyle to drive rapid adaption but have the people still survive and choose to live in the caves so long is hard...
            $endgroup$
            – dsollen
            10 hours ago




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
            $endgroup$
            – StephenG
            10 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            generation 2-10 will never use their sight That's silly. They'll use artificial light, basic fire is need be. After all, their brains won't stop working. Just because they've no natural light doesn't mean they're going to mope around in the dark forever.
            $endgroup$
            – StephenG
            10 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            10 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @dsollen the purpose for going underground was based on what the lost people consider to be the pull of their main god.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            10 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            7 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            @StephenG the OP specifies no light sources. which is completely believable, there is not much to burn in caves.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            7 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
            $endgroup$
            – Darrel Hoffman
            7 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @John If there's nothing to burn, there's nothing to eat either. Presumably anything edible enough to sustain life for that long is also flammable. Unless we're going to accept magic in this universe, they'd either have both a source of food and light, or neither of them, in which case they'd all starve in the first generation.
            $endgroup$
            – Darrel Hoffman
            7 hours ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            10 generations is a long time... I think they would have started to fade into memory about 8 generations ago lol but anyway:



            Species that only live inside caves are known as troglobites. Troglobites have a few distinct adaptations. They may have developed an ability to use food more efficiently by slowing their metabolism. They maybe have developed anophthalmia or a loss of eyesight or an efficiency in low-light. They may also have devloped depigmentation of the skin. Some creatures may develop extra chemical and tactile sensory organs to make up for loss of visual stimuli. Keep in mind they may not actually be troglobites they could just be troglophile's. Troglophile's have the ability to live both in and outside of caves.



            So for your cave dwelling humans I am imagining a semi-loss of hearing, eyesight and skin pigmentation. They are most likely getting shorter and more stocky. They could be developing hunched backs and hardened skin. They are perhaps even developing extra sensory organs such as antennae.



            EDIT: Based on others insights I would have to agree that 10 generations is not going to be long enough a period of time to see any significant evolutionary changes such as antennae.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              11 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              6 hours ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            10 generations is a long time... I think they would have started to fade into memory about 8 generations ago lol but anyway:



            Species that only live inside caves are known as troglobites. Troglobites have a few distinct adaptations. They may have developed an ability to use food more efficiently by slowing their metabolism. They maybe have developed anophthalmia or a loss of eyesight or an efficiency in low-light. They may also have devloped depigmentation of the skin. Some creatures may develop extra chemical and tactile sensory organs to make up for loss of visual stimuli. Keep in mind they may not actually be troglobites they could just be troglophile's. Troglophile's have the ability to live both in and outside of caves.



            So for your cave dwelling humans I am imagining a semi-loss of hearing, eyesight and skin pigmentation. They are most likely getting shorter and more stocky. They could be developing hunched backs and hardened skin. They are perhaps even developing extra sensory organs such as antennae.



            EDIT: Based on others insights I would have to agree that 10 generations is not going to be long enough a period of time to see any significant evolutionary changes such as antennae.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              11 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              6 hours ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            10 generations is a long time... I think they would have started to fade into memory about 8 generations ago lol but anyway:



            Species that only live inside caves are known as troglobites. Troglobites have a few distinct adaptations. They may have developed an ability to use food more efficiently by slowing their metabolism. They maybe have developed anophthalmia or a loss of eyesight or an efficiency in low-light. They may also have devloped depigmentation of the skin. Some creatures may develop extra chemical and tactile sensory organs to make up for loss of visual stimuli. Keep in mind they may not actually be troglobites they could just be troglophile's. Troglophile's have the ability to live both in and outside of caves.



            So for your cave dwelling humans I am imagining a semi-loss of hearing, eyesight and skin pigmentation. They are most likely getting shorter and more stocky. They could be developing hunched backs and hardened skin. They are perhaps even developing extra sensory organs such as antennae.



            EDIT: Based on others insights I would have to agree that 10 generations is not going to be long enough a period of time to see any significant evolutionary changes such as antennae.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            10 generations is a long time... I think they would have started to fade into memory about 8 generations ago lol but anyway:



            Species that only live inside caves are known as troglobites. Troglobites have a few distinct adaptations. They may have developed an ability to use food more efficiently by slowing their metabolism. They maybe have developed anophthalmia or a loss of eyesight or an efficiency in low-light. They may also have devloped depigmentation of the skin. Some creatures may develop extra chemical and tactile sensory organs to make up for loss of visual stimuli. Keep in mind they may not actually be troglobites they could just be troglophile's. Troglophile's have the ability to live both in and outside of caves.



            So for your cave dwelling humans I am imagining a semi-loss of hearing, eyesight and skin pigmentation. They are most likely getting shorter and more stocky. They could be developing hunched backs and hardened skin. They are perhaps even developing extra sensory organs such as antennae.



            EDIT: Based on others insights I would have to agree that 10 generations is not going to be long enough a period of time to see any significant evolutionary changes such as antennae.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 10 hours ago

























            answered 11 hours ago









            RobRob

            54818




            54818











            • $begingroup$
              They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              11 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              6 hours ago

















            • $begingroup$
              They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              11 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              11 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
              $endgroup$
              – Alex
              10 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
              $endgroup$
              – John
              7 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
              $endgroup$
              – Rob
              6 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            11 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            They manage to stay relevant by the success of their expansive civil engineering projects which is an essential part our country. Some sections of the tunnels have chiseled art pieces of the lost people working, and of their gods. The maps we still use were all drawn up by the people as well, and their lessons of how to most effectively use the tunnels are taught to all minors in our country. The newest writers stopped attributing this knowledge to them, that's why they had started to fade.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            11 hours ago




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            11 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            10 generations is not long enough for serous physical changes due to evolution.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            11 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            10 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @John yes, but I am not necessarily talking about evolution. The need to crouch might result in the population developing major spine dis-morphia. The use of hands for digging might overtime result in a population with top heavy muscular mass. All these traits would effect the human body, per the question.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            10 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            7 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            if these changes are effecting subsequent generations that is evolution. Also why would they loose hearing sound works perfectly fine in a cave.heck considering humans can use primitive echolocation their hearing might get better.
            $endgroup$
            – John
            7 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob
            6 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            @John Oh lol yeah I probably didn't think that through. When you said they were diggers I had moles in mind and was thinking about mole people. Moles have very small ears.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob
            6 hours ago












            1












            $begingroup$

            Everyone so far has focused in on the idea that evolutionary changes can't happen in the span of 10 generations, but there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest the epigenetic traits can change within one individual's lifetime.
            https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/exposure-to-cold-temperatures-can-change-our-gene-expression-and-fat-cells/



            So I'd say you could have just about any changes you wanted - they naturally produce more Vitamin A and have sharp low-light vision - but maybe get easily stunned by bright lights.



            They grow to shorter heights, their skin is tougher - the nails of their hands and feet have grown thicker and stronger.



            The ability to sense temperature, pressure, and moisture has been enhanced.



            You name it, you can probably justify it.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            Everyone so far has focused in on the idea that evolutionary changes can't happen in the span of 10 generations, but there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest the epigenetic traits can change within one individual's lifetime.
            https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/exposure-to-cold-temperatures-can-change-our-gene-expression-and-fat-cells/



            So I'd say you could have just about any changes you wanted - they naturally produce more Vitamin A and have sharp low-light vision - but maybe get easily stunned by bright lights.



            They grow to shorter heights, their skin is tougher - the nails of their hands and feet have grown thicker and stronger.



            The ability to sense temperature, pressure, and moisture has been enhanced.



            You name it, you can probably justify it.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Everyone so far has focused in on the idea that evolutionary changes can't happen in the span of 10 generations, but there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest the epigenetic traits can change within one individual's lifetime.
            https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/exposure-to-cold-temperatures-can-change-our-gene-expression-and-fat-cells/



            So I'd say you could have just about any changes you wanted - they naturally produce more Vitamin A and have sharp low-light vision - but maybe get easily stunned by bright lights.



            They grow to shorter heights, their skin is tougher - the nails of their hands and feet have grown thicker and stronger.



            The ability to sense temperature, pressure, and moisture has been enhanced.



            You name it, you can probably justify it.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            Everyone so far has focused in on the idea that evolutionary changes can't happen in the span of 10 generations, but there is sufficient scientific evidence to suggest the epigenetic traits can change within one individual's lifetime.
            https://www.whatisepigenetics.com/exposure-to-cold-temperatures-can-change-our-gene-expression-and-fat-cells/



            So I'd say you could have just about any changes you wanted - they naturally produce more Vitamin A and have sharp low-light vision - but maybe get easily stunned by bright lights.



            They grow to shorter heights, their skin is tougher - the nails of their hands and feet have grown thicker and stronger.



            The ability to sense temperature, pressure, and moisture has been enhanced.



            You name it, you can probably justify it.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 5 hours ago









            SalvatoreSalvatore

            113




            113




            New contributor




            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Salvatore is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • $begingroup$
              Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
              $endgroup$
              – Liam Morris
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
            $endgroup$
            – Liam Morris
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Hi, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! Please take the time to read through our tour if you haven’t yet and visit our help center if you need more information. I would encourage you to visit the Sandbox on Worldbuilding Meta if you are unsure if a question is suitable for our site. I also encourage you to visit our list of worldbuilding resources for inspiration and help with general questions: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/143606/…
            $endgroup$
            – Liam Morris
            3 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145777%2fhow-would-10-generations-of-living-underground-change-the-human-body%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Where did Arya get these scars? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why did Arya refuse to end it?Has the pronunciation of Arya Stark's name changed?Has Arya forgiven people?Why did Arya Stark lose her vision?Why can Arya still use the faces?Has the Narrow Sea become narrower?Does Arya Stark know how to make poisons outside of the House of Black and White?Why did Nymeria leave Arya?Why did Arya not kill the Lannister soldiers she encountered in the Riverlands?What is the current canonical age of Sansa, Bran and Arya Stark?