Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?Can you determine whether a compound can form given particular elements?Except pure alloys, are there any compounds with more metal elements proportion of atoms than nonmetal elements in proportion of atoms?How can transition metals form so many bonds with ligands?Why do different elements form different types of carbides?Can our chemical elements be differents on other universes?Can Carbon Form bonds without Hybridization?Why can two carbon atoms not form more than triple bond with each other?How many bonds can nitrogen form?Textbook Claim: “… in all cases it is the electrostatic force acting between charged particles that is responsible for all the forms of bonding.”Why is it not possible for seven close copper atoms to come together to gain a noble-gas configuration of valence electrons?
If a planet has 3 moons, is it possible to have triple Full/New Moons at once?
How to denote matrix elements succinctly?
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
A Note on N!
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
What are the characteristics of a typeless programming language?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?
How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Elements other than carbon that can form many different compounds by bonding to themselves?
Can you determine whether a compound can form given particular elements?Except pure alloys, are there any compounds with more metal elements proportion of atoms than nonmetal elements in proportion of atoms?How can transition metals form so many bonds with ligands?Why do different elements form different types of carbides?Can our chemical elements be differents on other universes?Can Carbon Form bonds without Hybridization?Why can two carbon atoms not form more than triple bond with each other?How many bonds can nitrogen form?Textbook Claim: “… in all cases it is the electrostatic force acting between charged particles that is responsible for all the forms of bonding.”Why is it not possible for seven close copper atoms to come together to gain a noble-gas configuration of valence electrons?
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
$endgroup$
My textbook says the following:
Unique among the elements, carbon can bond to itself to form extremely strong two-dimensional sheets, as it does in graphite, as well as buckyballs and nanotubes.
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this? Is there a term to describe such elements?
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
I would greatly appreciate it if people could please take the time to clarify this.
bond elements
bond elements
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
edited 6 hours ago
Karsten Theis
5,104644
5,104644
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
asked 19 hours ago
The PointerThe Pointer
1814
1814
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
9
9
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114364%2felements-other-than-carbon-that-can-form-many-different-compounds-by-bonding-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
$endgroup$
Is carbon the only element that can do this?
No, carbon is not the only element with such characteristics.
If not, then what are the other elements can also do this?
There is a whole number of elements such as silicon, arsenic, germanium.
Is there a term to describe such elements?
At least I'm unaware of such a term, which might be furnished by our far wiser community.
What is the chemical characteristic that allows this to occur?
Catenation.
More information:
According to the Molecular Orbital Theory, the condition for a compound to exist is that it should have more electrons in the bonding orbitals than in the anti-bonding orbitals. So, as long as you have the bonding orbitals filled more, you can have pretty anything, more than just chains of atoms.
Thus, the existence of a compound also depends on the precise conditions in which the compound is kept, for example sodium forms different types of chlorides under different conditions and that as pointed out by Poutnik in the comments, $ceHe2^1+$ and a ton of others are discovered and still more awaiting discovery.
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
edited 15 hours ago
Martin - マーチン♦
34.1k9112239
34.1k9112239
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
answered 19 hours ago
user79161user79161
17818
17818
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
No, carbon is not the only one that can bond to itself. It's a unique property of some elements mainly the group 14 elements like silicon, germanium, arsenic etc. This phenomenon is called catenation. It might be mainly due to presence of four valence electrons in their outermost shell. A large number of carbon atoms are linked with each other with sigma and pi bonds. However catenation gets limited as we move down the group in group 14.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
answered 15 hours ago
Charlie GogoiCharlie Gogoi
91
91
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Charlie Gogoi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
So most of this has been answered, but the main elements that can bond to themselves are called diatomic atoms. This includes hydrogen, nitrogen, fluorine, oxygen, iodine, chlorine, and bromine. There are other elements that can do this as well, however these main elements occur naturally in their diatomic state as gases.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
edited 9 hours ago
andselisk
19.9k667129
19.9k667129
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
answered 10 hours ago
Santiago ArellanoSantiago Arellano
12
12
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Santiago Arellano is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Diatomic atom" is a weird term, diatomic molecule makes way more sense. Besides, the way the answer is formulated, it appears to me that all elements that are capable of self-bonding are diatomic molecules, whereas in reality diatomic molecules is a tiny subset of the former.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's pretty clear that the question is asking about self-bonding beyond simple diatomic molecules.
$endgroup$
– Mark
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
The ability to make a stable diatomic molecule might be the reason for not observing chains or 2D structures for these elements.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f114364%2felements-other-than-carbon-that-can-form-many-different-compounds-by-bonding-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Catenation : self linking property of an element (atom).
$endgroup$
– glucose
19 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
The right question isn't whether an element can bond to itself. Plenty do that. The issue is whether an element can form a wide variety of stable structures when bonded to itself.
$endgroup$
– matt_black
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I was also aware that boron sheets were recently synthesized, but did not realize that someone has even predicted nitrogen sheets that could be stable at room temperature!
$endgroup$
– jeffB
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Sulfur can also form rings and chains
$endgroup$
– porphyrin
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
What is the actual question here? Your citation does not say that bonding between identical atoms is something unique - every single element could do this even if transiently. The point is that carbon carbon allotropes are somewhat exceptional.
$endgroup$
– Mithoron
8 hours ago