What transparent parametrizations of 2x2 matrices are there? Announcing the arrival of Valued...

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

Why is the AVR GCC compiler using a full `CALL` even though I have set the `-mshort-calls` flag?

Illegal assignment from sObject to Id

Chinese Seal on silk painting - what does it mean?

Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Sending unknown callers to voice mail automatically?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

What is "gratricide"?

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

ArcGIS Pro Python arcpy.CreatePersonalGDB_management

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

What is a fractional matching?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in Into the Spider-Verse?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

Question about debouncing - delay of state change

How does Python know the values already stored in its memory?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

Time to Settle Down!

Is a ledger board required if the side of my house is wood?



What transparent parametrizations of 2x2 matrices are there?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Solution to system of difference equations with repeated unit rootsEigenvectors of a $2 times 2$ matrix when the eigenvalues are not integersB and C matrices for real modal representation of a 2x2 linear system with complex eigenvaluesInverse spectrum problem - showing the existence of a 2x2 doubly stochastic matrix,Prove that $lambda_1^2$, $lambda_1lambda_2$ and $lambda_2^2$ are eigenvalues of matrix $A$Find “REAL” cannonical form of 4x4 matrixConjugate classes for 2x2 matriceseigenvalues of a 6x6 matrix with many zerosDetermining the maximum number of linearly independent rows and columns for a given matrixEquilibria of 2x2 linear system












1












$begingroup$


I want to contruct a time series by a recurrence relation $y_t = Ay_{t-1}$, where A is a 2x2 real matrix. Assume $y_0$ is some known initial condition. Also, I assume $y_i in mathbb R^2$.



To understand the system without having to solve the equation, it would be nice to have a parametrization of the matrix that is transparent with the behavior of the solution.



The most simple parametrization would be by the real entries in the matrix. Use $(a,b,c,d)$. Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand the dynamics of the system easily by this set of parameters.



$$ A_{a,b,c,d} = begin{bmatrix}
a& b\
c & d
end{bmatrix}$$



Option two is if the matrix is (real) diagonalizable. Taking the eigenvalues $(lambda_1,lambda_2)$. On the downside, this will only give system dynamics that are exponential growth of decline.



$$ B_{lambda_1,lambda_2} = begin{bmatrix}
lambda_1& 0\
0 & lambda_2
end{bmatrix}$$



Option three is to think of the solutions as damped pendulum solutions. Then the paramterization is $(zeta, omega)$, giving below matrix. The notation is inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator, but it is not perfectly equivalent. In this notation, I can easily read off the dampening of the solutions, since $zeta$ is the real part of the eigenvalues, and the frequency, since $omega$ gives the imaginary part of the eigenvalues.



$$ C_{zeta,omega} = begin{bmatrix}
zeta& -omega\
omega & zeta
end{bmatrix}
$$



The three examples are not satisfactory to me, since they produce either (A) solutions that are not easily coupled to the parameters, (B) noninteresting dynamics, or (C) only spans a 2-dimensional subspace of all 2x2-matrices.



My question: What other parametrizations of real 2x2 matrices is there, that give instant intuition for the corresponding dynamical system?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 10:20










  • $begingroup$
    Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 10:40












  • $begingroup$
    That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 11:14
















1












$begingroup$


I want to contruct a time series by a recurrence relation $y_t = Ay_{t-1}$, where A is a 2x2 real matrix. Assume $y_0$ is some known initial condition. Also, I assume $y_i in mathbb R^2$.



To understand the system without having to solve the equation, it would be nice to have a parametrization of the matrix that is transparent with the behavior of the solution.



The most simple parametrization would be by the real entries in the matrix. Use $(a,b,c,d)$. Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand the dynamics of the system easily by this set of parameters.



$$ A_{a,b,c,d} = begin{bmatrix}
a& b\
c & d
end{bmatrix}$$



Option two is if the matrix is (real) diagonalizable. Taking the eigenvalues $(lambda_1,lambda_2)$. On the downside, this will only give system dynamics that are exponential growth of decline.



$$ B_{lambda_1,lambda_2} = begin{bmatrix}
lambda_1& 0\
0 & lambda_2
end{bmatrix}$$



Option three is to think of the solutions as damped pendulum solutions. Then the paramterization is $(zeta, omega)$, giving below matrix. The notation is inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator, but it is not perfectly equivalent. In this notation, I can easily read off the dampening of the solutions, since $zeta$ is the real part of the eigenvalues, and the frequency, since $omega$ gives the imaginary part of the eigenvalues.



$$ C_{zeta,omega} = begin{bmatrix}
zeta& -omega\
omega & zeta
end{bmatrix}
$$



The three examples are not satisfactory to me, since they produce either (A) solutions that are not easily coupled to the parameters, (B) noninteresting dynamics, or (C) only spans a 2-dimensional subspace of all 2x2-matrices.



My question: What other parametrizations of real 2x2 matrices is there, that give instant intuition for the corresponding dynamical system?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 10:20










  • $begingroup$
    Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 10:40












  • $begingroup$
    That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 11:14














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I want to contruct a time series by a recurrence relation $y_t = Ay_{t-1}$, where A is a 2x2 real matrix. Assume $y_0$ is some known initial condition. Also, I assume $y_i in mathbb R^2$.



To understand the system without having to solve the equation, it would be nice to have a parametrization of the matrix that is transparent with the behavior of the solution.



The most simple parametrization would be by the real entries in the matrix. Use $(a,b,c,d)$. Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand the dynamics of the system easily by this set of parameters.



$$ A_{a,b,c,d} = begin{bmatrix}
a& b\
c & d
end{bmatrix}$$



Option two is if the matrix is (real) diagonalizable. Taking the eigenvalues $(lambda_1,lambda_2)$. On the downside, this will only give system dynamics that are exponential growth of decline.



$$ B_{lambda_1,lambda_2} = begin{bmatrix}
lambda_1& 0\
0 & lambda_2
end{bmatrix}$$



Option three is to think of the solutions as damped pendulum solutions. Then the paramterization is $(zeta, omega)$, giving below matrix. The notation is inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator, but it is not perfectly equivalent. In this notation, I can easily read off the dampening of the solutions, since $zeta$ is the real part of the eigenvalues, and the frequency, since $omega$ gives the imaginary part of the eigenvalues.



$$ C_{zeta,omega} = begin{bmatrix}
zeta& -omega\
omega & zeta
end{bmatrix}
$$



The three examples are not satisfactory to me, since they produce either (A) solutions that are not easily coupled to the parameters, (B) noninteresting dynamics, or (C) only spans a 2-dimensional subspace of all 2x2-matrices.



My question: What other parametrizations of real 2x2 matrices is there, that give instant intuition for the corresponding dynamical system?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to contruct a time series by a recurrence relation $y_t = Ay_{t-1}$, where A is a 2x2 real matrix. Assume $y_0$ is some known initial condition. Also, I assume $y_i in mathbb R^2$.



To understand the system without having to solve the equation, it would be nice to have a parametrization of the matrix that is transparent with the behavior of the solution.



The most simple parametrization would be by the real entries in the matrix. Use $(a,b,c,d)$. Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand the dynamics of the system easily by this set of parameters.



$$ A_{a,b,c,d} = begin{bmatrix}
a& b\
c & d
end{bmatrix}$$



Option two is if the matrix is (real) diagonalizable. Taking the eigenvalues $(lambda_1,lambda_2)$. On the downside, this will only give system dynamics that are exponential growth of decline.



$$ B_{lambda_1,lambda_2} = begin{bmatrix}
lambda_1& 0\
0 & lambda_2
end{bmatrix}$$



Option three is to think of the solutions as damped pendulum solutions. Then the paramterization is $(zeta, omega)$, giving below matrix. The notation is inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator, but it is not perfectly equivalent. In this notation, I can easily read off the dampening of the solutions, since $zeta$ is the real part of the eigenvalues, and the frequency, since $omega$ gives the imaginary part of the eigenvalues.



$$ C_{zeta,omega} = begin{bmatrix}
zeta& -omega\
omega & zeta
end{bmatrix}
$$



The three examples are not satisfactory to me, since they produce either (A) solutions that are not easily coupled to the parameters, (B) noninteresting dynamics, or (C) only spans a 2-dimensional subspace of all 2x2-matrices.



My question: What other parametrizations of real 2x2 matrices is there, that give instant intuition for the corresponding dynamical system?







matrices dynamical-systems






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 10:19







LudvigH

















asked Mar 25 at 8:59









LudvigHLudvigH

1186




1186












  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 10:20










  • $begingroup$
    Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 10:40












  • $begingroup$
    That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 11:14


















  • $begingroup$
    I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 10:20










  • $begingroup$
    Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 10:40












  • $begingroup$
    That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 11:14
















$begingroup$
I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:53




$begingroup$
I don't know what you mean by parametrization of a matrix, but, if the matrix is diagonalizable, then the recurrence can be rewritten in terms of the diagonal matrix (and the eigenvectors).
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 9:53












$begingroup$
I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 10:20




$begingroup$
I have updated the question now. Is it clearer in this phrasing?
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 10:20












$begingroup$
Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 10:40






$begingroup$
Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},pmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},pmatrix{a&-bcr b&a}$$ Each of those gives about as much insight as there is into the behavior of the dynamical system.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 10:40














$begingroup$
That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 11:14




$begingroup$
That is just about the type of answer I hoped for. Write it as an answer and I'll accept it. :)
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 11:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},quadpmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},quadpmatrix{a&-bcr b&acr}$$ Each of those gives you about as much insight into the behavior of a dynamical system as you can get.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 21:58












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161538%2fwhat-transparent-parametrizations-of-2x2-matrices-are-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},quadpmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},quadpmatrix{a&-bcr b&acr}$$ Each of those gives you about as much insight into the behavior of a dynamical system as you can get.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 21:58
















1












$begingroup$

Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},quadpmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},quadpmatrix{a&-bcr b&acr}$$ Each of those gives you about as much insight into the behavior of a dynamical system as you can get.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 21:58














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},quadpmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},quadpmatrix{a&-bcr b&acr}$$ Each of those gives you about as much insight into the behavior of a dynamical system as you can get.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Every $2times2$ real matrix is similar to a real matrix of exactly one of the following three forms: $$pmatrix{a&0cr0&bcr},quadpmatrix{a&1cr0&acr},quadpmatrix{a&-bcr b&acr}$$ Each of those gives you about as much insight into the behavior of a dynamical system as you can get.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 25 at 11:34









Gerry MyersonGerry Myerson

148k8152306




148k8152306












  • $begingroup$
    So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 21:58


















  • $begingroup$
    So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
    $endgroup$
    – LudvigH
    Mar 25 at 12:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 25 at 21:58
















$begingroup$
So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 12:43




$begingroup$
So what do you call the three? Diagonal form, Jordan form and 'real jordan form' ?
$endgroup$
– LudvigH
Mar 25 at 12:43




1




1




$begingroup$
The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 21:58




$begingroup$
The third one could be called real canonical form as at math.byu.edu/~grant/courses/m634/f99/lec11.pdf Diagonal form is just a special case of Jordan form.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 25 at 21:58


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161538%2fwhat-transparent-parametrizations-of-2x2-matrices-are-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...