A pre-calculus problem about a quadratic functionIs this a problem that has already been solved?How to know...

What exactly is the purpose of connection links straped between the rocket and the launch pad

What is the likely impact on flights of grounding an entire aircraft series?

Time dilation for a moving electronic clock

Provisioning profile doesn't include the application-identifier and keychain-access-groups entitlements

If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?

Force user to remove USB token

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

Decoding assembly instructions in a Game Boy disassembler

Counter-example to the existence of left Bousfield localization of combinatorial model category

Want to switch to tankless, but can I use my existing wiring?

Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?

My story is written in English, but is set in my home country. What language should I use for the dialogue?

Unreachable code, but reachable with exception

Make a transparent 448*448 image

Playing ONE triplet (not three)

Touchscreen-controlled dentist office snowman collector game

Is all copper pipe pretty much the same?

Can "semicircle" be used to refer to a part-circle that is not a exact half-circle?

Co-worker team leader wants to inject the crap software product of his friends into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

Do Bugbears' arms literally get longer when it's their turn?

What does it mean when multiple 々 marks follow a 、?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

"However" used in a conditional clause?



A pre-calculus problem about a quadratic function


Is this a problem that has already been solved?How to know when a line is parallel to the xz-planeFind range of $sin x+cos^{2}x$Proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.Function exercise check-upIs the graph of $(cos x)(sec x)$ discontinuous?Is there an error in this AP Calculus quiz on function transformations?If $f$ continuous and $[f(x_1)+…+f(x_n)]/n=f([x_1+…+x_n]/n)$ then $f$ linearConfusing high school questionProve that every even degree polynomial function has a maximum or minimum in $mathbb{R}$













5












$begingroup$


This is from a high school junior math test (I'm not a high school student); The problem as designed to take less than 20 minutes, preferably 10-15. Judging from its source, this is not a trick question, and I am pretty sure all information given must be used.



Also, we cannot use continuity, sequence, differentiation or integration.




Let $f(x)$ be a quadratic polynomial with a positive leading coefficient. Let $g(x) = 1 - frac{2}{x-5}$ with the domain $x < 5$. For any real number $t < 3$, let $h(t)$ be the minimum of $f(g(x))$ for $t leq x leq t+2$. Suppose also that $h(t)= f(g(t+2))$ when $t < 1$ and $h(t) = 6$ for $1 leq t < 3$ and that $h(-1) =7$. Find $f(5)$.




It suffices to find an explicit formula for $f$, which is the direction I am heading at.



Here is my work so far: using the fact that the leading coefficient of $f$ is positive and that $g$ is strixtly increasing, I can deduce that the "tip" of the graph of $f$ lies on or to the right of the line $x=3$. Also, $h(-1) =7$ is exactly the statement that $f(frac32) = 7$.



My intuition tells me that the tip must lie on the line $x=3$, but I am not sure how to prove it. The difficulty lies in the fact that, even if the tip of $f$ lies not on the line, I am not exactly sure that such would imply $f$ wouldn't be constant at some subinterval of $1 leq t < 3$. I am slightly unsure of how to use the fact that $h(t) = 6$ on $[1,3]$. If my first conjecture is true, then $f(g(x)), t leq x leq t+2$ with fixed $1 leq t < 3$, must have its minimum when $f$ has its mimimum so long as $g^{-1}(3)=4$ lies on the interval... am I right? Please correct me if I am wrong.



EDIT: by playing around with Desmos, I may be wrong on the claim that the tip of $f$ must lie on or to the right of $x=3$...



Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 9 at 20:12












  • $begingroup$
    @enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 2:35


















5












$begingroup$


This is from a high school junior math test (I'm not a high school student); The problem as designed to take less than 20 minutes, preferably 10-15. Judging from its source, this is not a trick question, and I am pretty sure all information given must be used.



Also, we cannot use continuity, sequence, differentiation or integration.




Let $f(x)$ be a quadratic polynomial with a positive leading coefficient. Let $g(x) = 1 - frac{2}{x-5}$ with the domain $x < 5$. For any real number $t < 3$, let $h(t)$ be the minimum of $f(g(x))$ for $t leq x leq t+2$. Suppose also that $h(t)= f(g(t+2))$ when $t < 1$ and $h(t) = 6$ for $1 leq t < 3$ and that $h(-1) =7$. Find $f(5)$.




It suffices to find an explicit formula for $f$, which is the direction I am heading at.



Here is my work so far: using the fact that the leading coefficient of $f$ is positive and that $g$ is strixtly increasing, I can deduce that the "tip" of the graph of $f$ lies on or to the right of the line $x=3$. Also, $h(-1) =7$ is exactly the statement that $f(frac32) = 7$.



My intuition tells me that the tip must lie on the line $x=3$, but I am not sure how to prove it. The difficulty lies in the fact that, even if the tip of $f$ lies not on the line, I am not exactly sure that such would imply $f$ wouldn't be constant at some subinterval of $1 leq t < 3$. I am slightly unsure of how to use the fact that $h(t) = 6$ on $[1,3]$. If my first conjecture is true, then $f(g(x)), t leq x leq t+2$ with fixed $1 leq t < 3$, must have its minimum when $f$ has its mimimum so long as $g^{-1}(3)=4$ lies on the interval... am I right? Please correct me if I am wrong.



EDIT: by playing around with Desmos, I may be wrong on the claim that the tip of $f$ must lie on or to the right of $x=3$...



Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 9 at 20:12












  • $begingroup$
    @enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 2:35
















5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


This is from a high school junior math test (I'm not a high school student); The problem as designed to take less than 20 minutes, preferably 10-15. Judging from its source, this is not a trick question, and I am pretty sure all information given must be used.



Also, we cannot use continuity, sequence, differentiation or integration.




Let $f(x)$ be a quadratic polynomial with a positive leading coefficient. Let $g(x) = 1 - frac{2}{x-5}$ with the domain $x < 5$. For any real number $t < 3$, let $h(t)$ be the minimum of $f(g(x))$ for $t leq x leq t+2$. Suppose also that $h(t)= f(g(t+2))$ when $t < 1$ and $h(t) = 6$ for $1 leq t < 3$ and that $h(-1) =7$. Find $f(5)$.




It suffices to find an explicit formula for $f$, which is the direction I am heading at.



Here is my work so far: using the fact that the leading coefficient of $f$ is positive and that $g$ is strixtly increasing, I can deduce that the "tip" of the graph of $f$ lies on or to the right of the line $x=3$. Also, $h(-1) =7$ is exactly the statement that $f(frac32) = 7$.



My intuition tells me that the tip must lie on the line $x=3$, but I am not sure how to prove it. The difficulty lies in the fact that, even if the tip of $f$ lies not on the line, I am not exactly sure that such would imply $f$ wouldn't be constant at some subinterval of $1 leq t < 3$. I am slightly unsure of how to use the fact that $h(t) = 6$ on $[1,3]$. If my first conjecture is true, then $f(g(x)), t leq x leq t+2$ with fixed $1 leq t < 3$, must have its minimum when $f$ has its mimimum so long as $g^{-1}(3)=4$ lies on the interval... am I right? Please correct me if I am wrong.



EDIT: by playing around with Desmos, I may be wrong on the claim that the tip of $f$ must lie on or to the right of $x=3$...



Any help would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is from a high school junior math test (I'm not a high school student); The problem as designed to take less than 20 minutes, preferably 10-15. Judging from its source, this is not a trick question, and I am pretty sure all information given must be used.



Also, we cannot use continuity, sequence, differentiation or integration.




Let $f(x)$ be a quadratic polynomial with a positive leading coefficient. Let $g(x) = 1 - frac{2}{x-5}$ with the domain $x < 5$. For any real number $t < 3$, let $h(t)$ be the minimum of $f(g(x))$ for $t leq x leq t+2$. Suppose also that $h(t)= f(g(t+2))$ when $t < 1$ and $h(t) = 6$ for $1 leq t < 3$ and that $h(-1) =7$. Find $f(5)$.




It suffices to find an explicit formula for $f$, which is the direction I am heading at.



Here is my work so far: using the fact that the leading coefficient of $f$ is positive and that $g$ is strixtly increasing, I can deduce that the "tip" of the graph of $f$ lies on or to the right of the line $x=3$. Also, $h(-1) =7$ is exactly the statement that $f(frac32) = 7$.



My intuition tells me that the tip must lie on the line $x=3$, but I am not sure how to prove it. The difficulty lies in the fact that, even if the tip of $f$ lies not on the line, I am not exactly sure that such would imply $f$ wouldn't be constant at some subinterval of $1 leq t < 3$. I am slightly unsure of how to use the fact that $h(t) = 6$ on $[1,3]$. If my first conjecture is true, then $f(g(x)), t leq x leq t+2$ with fixed $1 leq t < 3$, must have its minimum when $f$ has its mimimum so long as $g^{-1}(3)=4$ lies on the interval... am I right? Please correct me if I am wrong.



EDIT: by playing around with Desmos, I may be wrong on the claim that the tip of $f$ must lie on or to the right of $x=3$...



Any help would be greatly appreciated.







functions problem-solving






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 10 at 3:42







Cute Brownie

















asked Mar 9 at 17:54









Cute BrownieCute Brownie

1,043417




1,043417












  • $begingroup$
    Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 9 at 20:12












  • $begingroup$
    @enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 2:35




















  • $begingroup$
    Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 9 at 20:12












  • $begingroup$
    @enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 2:35


















$begingroup$
Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 9 at 20:12






$begingroup$
Tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$, so tip of $f$ lies on $x = g(3) = 1 - 2/(-2) = 2$.
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 9 at 20:12














$begingroup$
@enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
$endgroup$
– Cute Brownie
Mar 10 at 2:35






$begingroup$
@enedil Thank you. Why is it that the tip of $f(g(x))$ lies on $x=3$? I sense that you are using the fact that $h$ is constant on $[1,3)$ but could you prove it rigorously? Fyi, the fact that $f$ is strictly decreasing doesn't mean that $f(g(x))$ is not constant, e.g. the interval $[0,1]$ with $f=x^2$, $g=1/x^2$.
$endgroup$
– Cute Brownie
Mar 10 at 2:35












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

As $g$ is increasing on whole domain (and it's an infinite interval), composition $f(g(x))$ increases where $f(x)$ increases. There is the "tip", say $g(x_0)$ s.t. for all smaller numbers, $f$ is decreasing and for all bigger, $f$ is increasing (basic properties of quadratics, and uses the fact that first coefficient of $f$ is positive). That means that if $x_0>t+2$, we know that $f(g(x))$ is strictly decreasing on $[t, t+2]$, therefore minimum is at right end of the interval. If $t leq x_0 leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$.
This in particular means that $x_0=3$, so the lowest point of $f$ is at $g(3)$.



So you have $7=h(-1)=f(g(1))=f(3/2)$ and $f(g(3))=6$, $-b/a=g(3)$, where $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 3:36










  • $begingroup$
    @CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 10 at 11:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141400%2fa-pre-calculus-problem-about-a-quadratic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

As $g$ is increasing on whole domain (and it's an infinite interval), composition $f(g(x))$ increases where $f(x)$ increases. There is the "tip", say $g(x_0)$ s.t. for all smaller numbers, $f$ is decreasing and for all bigger, $f$ is increasing (basic properties of quadratics, and uses the fact that first coefficient of $f$ is positive). That means that if $x_0>t+2$, we know that $f(g(x))$ is strictly decreasing on $[t, t+2]$, therefore minimum is at right end of the interval. If $t leq x_0 leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$.
This in particular means that $x_0=3$, so the lowest point of $f$ is at $g(3)$.



So you have $7=h(-1)=f(g(1))=f(3/2)$ and $f(g(3))=6$, $-b/a=g(3)$, where $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 3:36










  • $begingroup$
    @CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 10 at 11:13
















0












$begingroup$

As $g$ is increasing on whole domain (and it's an infinite interval), composition $f(g(x))$ increases where $f(x)$ increases. There is the "tip", say $g(x_0)$ s.t. for all smaller numbers, $f$ is decreasing and for all bigger, $f$ is increasing (basic properties of quadratics, and uses the fact that first coefficient of $f$ is positive). That means that if $x_0>t+2$, we know that $f(g(x))$ is strictly decreasing on $[t, t+2]$, therefore minimum is at right end of the interval. If $t leq x_0 leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$.
This in particular means that $x_0=3$, so the lowest point of $f$ is at $g(3)$.



So you have $7=h(-1)=f(g(1))=f(3/2)$ and $f(g(3))=6$, $-b/a=g(3)$, where $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 3:36










  • $begingroup$
    @CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 10 at 11:13














0












0








0





$begingroup$

As $g$ is increasing on whole domain (and it's an infinite interval), composition $f(g(x))$ increases where $f(x)$ increases. There is the "tip", say $g(x_0)$ s.t. for all smaller numbers, $f$ is decreasing and for all bigger, $f$ is increasing (basic properties of quadratics, and uses the fact that first coefficient of $f$ is positive). That means that if $x_0>t+2$, we know that $f(g(x))$ is strictly decreasing on $[t, t+2]$, therefore minimum is at right end of the interval. If $t leq x_0 leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$.
This in particular means that $x_0=3$, so the lowest point of $f$ is at $g(3)$.



So you have $7=h(-1)=f(g(1))=f(3/2)$ and $f(g(3))=6$, $-b/a=g(3)$, where $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



As $g$ is increasing on whole domain (and it's an infinite interval), composition $f(g(x))$ increases where $f(x)$ increases. There is the "tip", say $g(x_0)$ s.t. for all smaller numbers, $f$ is decreasing and for all bigger, $f$ is increasing (basic properties of quadratics, and uses the fact that first coefficient of $f$ is positive). That means that if $x_0>t+2$, we know that $f(g(x))$ is strictly decreasing on $[t, t+2]$, therefore minimum is at right end of the interval. If $t leq x_0 leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$.
This in particular means that $x_0=3$, so the lowest point of $f$ is at $g(3)$.



So you have $7=h(-1)=f(g(1))=f(3/2)$ and $f(g(3))=6$, $-b/a=g(3)$, where $f(x)=ax^2+bx+c$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 10 at 11:19

























answered Mar 10 at 2:45









enedilenedil

1,466620




1,466620












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 3:36










  • $begingroup$
    @CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 10 at 11:13


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
    $endgroup$
    – Cute Brownie
    Mar 10 at 3:36










  • $begingroup$
    @CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
    $endgroup$
    – enedil
    Mar 10 at 11:13
















$begingroup$
Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
$endgroup$
– Cute Brownie
Mar 10 at 3:36




$begingroup$
Thank you. Could you elaborate on your statement "if $t leq x leq t+2$, then minimum of $f(g(x))$ is at $x_0$?" I am not sure if this is the case, since it may be the case that $g(x_0)$ will give us the point $x_1$ which will make $f$ itself minimum on the interval.
$endgroup$
– Cute Brownie
Mar 10 at 3:36












$begingroup$
@CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 10 at 11:13




$begingroup$
@CuteBrownie you're right, I was writing it being half asleep. I Will correct this difference between notation.
$endgroup$
– enedil
Mar 10 at 11:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141400%2fa-pre-calculus-problem-about-a-quadratic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...