Removing brackets and negative values within equations Announcing the arrival of Valued...
When is phishing education going too far?
Blender game recording at the wrong time
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?
How many things? AとBがふたつ
What are the performance impacts of 'functional' Rust?
What do you call the holes in a flute?
Passing functions in C++
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?
Slither Like a Snake
Estimated State payment too big --> money back; + 2018 Tax Reform
How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?
If I can make up priors, why can't I make up posteriors?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Area of a 2D convex hull
What can I do if my MacBook isn’t charging but already ran out?
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
Determine whether f is a function, an injection, a surjection
Why is there no army of Iron-Mans in the MCU?
Autumning in love
No baking right
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
Removing brackets and negative values within equations
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Convert time duration a to decimal figureQuestions about solving inequality: $2 < frac{3x+1}{2x+4}$How does this algebraic trick work?Can you help me subtract intervals?How can $r$ be negative when dealing with polar coordinates?Beginner proofs in Serge Lang's Basic MathematicsImportance of parameter constraints with function transformationsproblem solving with functions: AMC12 question“Adding a negative” and other questions about the minus sign.How to determine linear function from “at a price (p) of 220 the demand is 180”
$begingroup$
So I wondered if anyone here can clarify something for me. I'm reading a maths book and one of the exercises has me a little confused:
Part of the -3(q-2) is simplified to -3 x -2.
It confuses me that the negative is taken into account for the two terms.
Shouldn't 4(q+1) and 3(q-2) be independent units due to dealing with the brackets first and then the later subtracted from the former?
Making it:
4(q+1) = 4q + 4
3(q-2) = 3q - 6
= 4q + 4 - 3q - 6
Taking the same logic and a simple example 10 - 2(3-1) Why would it be -2 x -1?
I always imagined I could have negative and positive values outside the brackets for example I could have:
10 - -2(3-1) = 10 - -2 x 3 - -2 x 1
= 10 - -6 - -2 = 14
Or I could have:
10 - 2(3-1) = 10 - 2 x 3 - 2 x 1
= 10 - 6 - 2 = 2
If I use their logic it doesn't seem to allow this choice and is very confusing. Any help on why it should be done like in the book would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for reading.
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I wondered if anyone here can clarify something for me. I'm reading a maths book and one of the exercises has me a little confused:
Part of the -3(q-2) is simplified to -3 x -2.
It confuses me that the negative is taken into account for the two terms.
Shouldn't 4(q+1) and 3(q-2) be independent units due to dealing with the brackets first and then the later subtracted from the former?
Making it:
4(q+1) = 4q + 4
3(q-2) = 3q - 6
= 4q + 4 - 3q - 6
Taking the same logic and a simple example 10 - 2(3-1) Why would it be -2 x -1?
I always imagined I could have negative and positive values outside the brackets for example I could have:
10 - -2(3-1) = 10 - -2 x 3 - -2 x 1
= 10 - -6 - -2 = 14
Or I could have:
10 - 2(3-1) = 10 - 2 x 3 - 2 x 1
= 10 - 6 - 2 = 2
If I use their logic it doesn't seem to allow this choice and is very confusing. Any help on why it should be done like in the book would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for reading.
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I wondered if anyone here can clarify something for me. I'm reading a maths book and one of the exercises has me a little confused:
Part of the -3(q-2) is simplified to -3 x -2.
It confuses me that the negative is taken into account for the two terms.
Shouldn't 4(q+1) and 3(q-2) be independent units due to dealing with the brackets first and then the later subtracted from the former?
Making it:
4(q+1) = 4q + 4
3(q-2) = 3q - 6
= 4q + 4 - 3q - 6
Taking the same logic and a simple example 10 - 2(3-1) Why would it be -2 x -1?
I always imagined I could have negative and positive values outside the brackets for example I could have:
10 - -2(3-1) = 10 - -2 x 3 - -2 x 1
= 10 - -6 - -2 = 14
Or I could have:
10 - 2(3-1) = 10 - 2 x 3 - 2 x 1
= 10 - 6 - 2 = 2
If I use their logic it doesn't seem to allow this choice and is very confusing. Any help on why it should be done like in the book would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for reading.
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
So I wondered if anyone here can clarify something for me. I'm reading a maths book and one of the exercises has me a little confused:
Part of the -3(q-2) is simplified to -3 x -2.
It confuses me that the negative is taken into account for the two terms.
Shouldn't 4(q+1) and 3(q-2) be independent units due to dealing with the brackets first and then the later subtracted from the former?
Making it:
4(q+1) = 4q + 4
3(q-2) = 3q - 6
= 4q + 4 - 3q - 6
Taking the same logic and a simple example 10 - 2(3-1) Why would it be -2 x -1?
I always imagined I could have negative and positive values outside the brackets for example I could have:
10 - -2(3-1) = 10 - -2 x 3 - -2 x 1
= 10 - -6 - -2 = 14
Or I could have:
10 - 2(3-1) = 10 - 2 x 3 - 2 x 1
= 10 - 6 - 2 = 2
If I use their logic it doesn't seem to allow this choice and is very confusing. Any help on why it should be done like in the book would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for reading.
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
asked Mar 23 at 12:41
NickNick
272
272
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The gist of the matter is that $$-(q-2)=-q+2$$ That is, it's the same as $$(-1)times(q-2)$$ and by the same token, $$-3(q-2)=(-3)(q-2)=(-3)(q)+(-3)(-2)=-3q+6$$
In your evaluation of $$10-2(3-1),$$ you insert a second minus sign, making it $$10--2(3-1).$$ There is no justification for this. The two expressions are not equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'll start by presenting a simpler example and then I'll go to the computations:
$$ 5 - 4 times(3-2) = 5 - 4 times 1 = 5 - 4 = 1$$
Or, alternatively, using the distributive property first, we will get a more complicated way of getting the same result but that (hopefully) explains the care we should take when there is a subtraction:
$$ 5 - (4 times 3 - 4 times 2) = 5 - 4 times 3 + 4 times 2 = 5 - 12 + 8 = -7 + 8 = 1$$
So, going back to the equation,
I'll try to breakdown in shorter steps, trying to make it easier:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
Recall that the product has priority over the subtraction, therefore I will place some superfluous parenthesis that do not change the result:
$$ (4(q+1)) - (3(q-2)) = 7$$
Now, I will use the distributive property of the product with the respect to the sums:
$$ (4q+4) - (3q-6) = 7$$
Now I can remove parenthesis, remembering that the negative is applied to all terms in the second parenthesis:
$$ 4q+4 - 3q+6 = 7$$
From this point onwards I think you don't have any doubts.
Alternatively, going back to the initial equation:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
We can think that it is $-3$ that is being multiplied by the second parenthesis:
$$ 4(q+1) + (-3)(q-2) = 7$$
Hence we get
$$ 4q+1 + (-3)q-(-3)times2 = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q-(-6) = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q+6 = 7$$
So, the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159266%2fremoving-brackets-and-negative-values-within-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The gist of the matter is that $$-(q-2)=-q+2$$ That is, it's the same as $$(-1)times(q-2)$$ and by the same token, $$-3(q-2)=(-3)(q-2)=(-3)(q)+(-3)(-2)=-3q+6$$
In your evaluation of $$10-2(3-1),$$ you insert a second minus sign, making it $$10--2(3-1).$$ There is no justification for this. The two expressions are not equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The gist of the matter is that $$-(q-2)=-q+2$$ That is, it's the same as $$(-1)times(q-2)$$ and by the same token, $$-3(q-2)=(-3)(q-2)=(-3)(q)+(-3)(-2)=-3q+6$$
In your evaluation of $$10-2(3-1),$$ you insert a second minus sign, making it $$10--2(3-1).$$ There is no justification for this. The two expressions are not equal.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The gist of the matter is that $$-(q-2)=-q+2$$ That is, it's the same as $$(-1)times(q-2)$$ and by the same token, $$-3(q-2)=(-3)(q-2)=(-3)(q)+(-3)(-2)=-3q+6$$
In your evaluation of $$10-2(3-1),$$ you insert a second minus sign, making it $$10--2(3-1).$$ There is no justification for this. The two expressions are not equal.
$endgroup$
The gist of the matter is that $$-(q-2)=-q+2$$ That is, it's the same as $$(-1)times(q-2)$$ and by the same token, $$-3(q-2)=(-3)(q-2)=(-3)(q)+(-3)(-2)=-3q+6$$
In your evaluation of $$10-2(3-1),$$ you insert a second minus sign, making it $$10--2(3-1).$$ There is no justification for this. The two expressions are not equal.
answered Mar 23 at 13:01
saulspatzsaulspatz
17.3k31435
17.3k31435
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'll start by presenting a simpler example and then I'll go to the computations:
$$ 5 - 4 times(3-2) = 5 - 4 times 1 = 5 - 4 = 1$$
Or, alternatively, using the distributive property first, we will get a more complicated way of getting the same result but that (hopefully) explains the care we should take when there is a subtraction:
$$ 5 - (4 times 3 - 4 times 2) = 5 - 4 times 3 + 4 times 2 = 5 - 12 + 8 = -7 + 8 = 1$$
So, going back to the equation,
I'll try to breakdown in shorter steps, trying to make it easier:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
Recall that the product has priority over the subtraction, therefore I will place some superfluous parenthesis that do not change the result:
$$ (4(q+1)) - (3(q-2)) = 7$$
Now, I will use the distributive property of the product with the respect to the sums:
$$ (4q+4) - (3q-6) = 7$$
Now I can remove parenthesis, remembering that the negative is applied to all terms in the second parenthesis:
$$ 4q+4 - 3q+6 = 7$$
From this point onwards I think you don't have any doubts.
Alternatively, going back to the initial equation:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
We can think that it is $-3$ that is being multiplied by the second parenthesis:
$$ 4(q+1) + (-3)(q-2) = 7$$
Hence we get
$$ 4q+1 + (-3)q-(-3)times2 = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q-(-6) = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q+6 = 7$$
So, the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'll start by presenting a simpler example and then I'll go to the computations:
$$ 5 - 4 times(3-2) = 5 - 4 times 1 = 5 - 4 = 1$$
Or, alternatively, using the distributive property first, we will get a more complicated way of getting the same result but that (hopefully) explains the care we should take when there is a subtraction:
$$ 5 - (4 times 3 - 4 times 2) = 5 - 4 times 3 + 4 times 2 = 5 - 12 + 8 = -7 + 8 = 1$$
So, going back to the equation,
I'll try to breakdown in shorter steps, trying to make it easier:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
Recall that the product has priority over the subtraction, therefore I will place some superfluous parenthesis that do not change the result:
$$ (4(q+1)) - (3(q-2)) = 7$$
Now, I will use the distributive property of the product with the respect to the sums:
$$ (4q+4) - (3q-6) = 7$$
Now I can remove parenthesis, remembering that the negative is applied to all terms in the second parenthesis:
$$ 4q+4 - 3q+6 = 7$$
From this point onwards I think you don't have any doubts.
Alternatively, going back to the initial equation:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
We can think that it is $-3$ that is being multiplied by the second parenthesis:
$$ 4(q+1) + (-3)(q-2) = 7$$
Hence we get
$$ 4q+1 + (-3)q-(-3)times2 = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q-(-6) = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q+6 = 7$$
So, the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'll start by presenting a simpler example and then I'll go to the computations:
$$ 5 - 4 times(3-2) = 5 - 4 times 1 = 5 - 4 = 1$$
Or, alternatively, using the distributive property first, we will get a more complicated way of getting the same result but that (hopefully) explains the care we should take when there is a subtraction:
$$ 5 - (4 times 3 - 4 times 2) = 5 - 4 times 3 + 4 times 2 = 5 - 12 + 8 = -7 + 8 = 1$$
So, going back to the equation,
I'll try to breakdown in shorter steps, trying to make it easier:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
Recall that the product has priority over the subtraction, therefore I will place some superfluous parenthesis that do not change the result:
$$ (4(q+1)) - (3(q-2)) = 7$$
Now, I will use the distributive property of the product with the respect to the sums:
$$ (4q+4) - (3q-6) = 7$$
Now I can remove parenthesis, remembering that the negative is applied to all terms in the second parenthesis:
$$ 4q+4 - 3q+6 = 7$$
From this point onwards I think you don't have any doubts.
Alternatively, going back to the initial equation:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
We can think that it is $-3$ that is being multiplied by the second parenthesis:
$$ 4(q+1) + (-3)(q-2) = 7$$
Hence we get
$$ 4q+1 + (-3)q-(-3)times2 = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q-(-6) = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q+6 = 7$$
So, the same result.
$endgroup$
I'll start by presenting a simpler example and then I'll go to the computations:
$$ 5 - 4 times(3-2) = 5 - 4 times 1 = 5 - 4 = 1$$
Or, alternatively, using the distributive property first, we will get a more complicated way of getting the same result but that (hopefully) explains the care we should take when there is a subtraction:
$$ 5 - (4 times 3 - 4 times 2) = 5 - 4 times 3 + 4 times 2 = 5 - 12 + 8 = -7 + 8 = 1$$
So, going back to the equation,
I'll try to breakdown in shorter steps, trying to make it easier:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
Recall that the product has priority over the subtraction, therefore I will place some superfluous parenthesis that do not change the result:
$$ (4(q+1)) - (3(q-2)) = 7$$
Now, I will use the distributive property of the product with the respect to the sums:
$$ (4q+4) - (3q-6) = 7$$
Now I can remove parenthesis, remembering that the negative is applied to all terms in the second parenthesis:
$$ 4q+4 - 3q+6 = 7$$
From this point onwards I think you don't have any doubts.
Alternatively, going back to the initial equation:
$$ 4(q+1) - 3(q-2) = 7$$
We can think that it is $-3$ that is being multiplied by the second parenthesis:
$$ 4(q+1) + (-3)(q-2) = 7$$
Hence we get
$$ 4q+1 + (-3)q-(-3)times2 = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q-(-6) = 7$$
$$ 4q+1 -3q+6 = 7$$
So, the same result.
answered Mar 23 at 13:03
ErtxiemErtxiem
757212
757212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3159266%2fremoving-brackets-and-negative-values-within-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown