Dtjytyk

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Jazz greats knew nothing of modes. Why are they used to improvise on standards?

What loss function to use when labels are probabilities?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

Is drag coefficient lowest at zero angle of attack?

How do you clear the ApexPages.getMessages() collection in a test?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Using "nakedly" instead of "with nothing on"

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Writing Thesis: Copying from published papers

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?

How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?

Cauchy Sequence Characterized only By Directly Neighbouring Sequence Members

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

Passing functions in C++

When is phishing education going too far?

Is “staff” singular or plural?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

10

2

In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":

We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.

^{(Emphasis changed.)}

Shouldn't this be "arrives"?

singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number

share|improve this question

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.
  
  – David K
  Mar 23 at 14:57
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.
  
  – chrylis
  Mar 23 at 20:32
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

10

2

In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":

We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.

^{(Emphasis changed.)}

Shouldn't this be "arrives"?

singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number

share|improve this question

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.
  
  – David K
  Mar 23 at 14:57
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.
  
  – chrylis
  Mar 23 at 20:32
  
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":

We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.

^{(Emphasis changed.)}

Shouldn't this be "arrives"?

singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number

share|improve this question

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

share|improve this question

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

share|improve this question

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

edited Mar 24 at 6:06

Solomon Ucko

1094

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

asked Mar 23 at 11:51

oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

534

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

8

EDIT

I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.

---

It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.

We can correctly say:

When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.

When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.

This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.

In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".

---

Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:

Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:

There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.

The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.

There are over a hundred staff in the company.

He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

---

Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.

[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 23 at 14:01

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:36
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:46
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.
  
  – Mixolydian
  Mar 23 at 14:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?
  
  – David K
  Mar 23 at 19:58
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 10 more comments

7

In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.

The staff in this shop are very helpful.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 12:38
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A staff of ten.
  
  – Kshitij Singh
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 13:35
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").

It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

8

EDIT

I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.

---

It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.

We can correctly say:

When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.

When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.

This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.

In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".

---

Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:

Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:

There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.

The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.

There are over a hundred staff in the company.

He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

---

Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.

[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 23 at 14:01

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:36
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:46
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.
  
  – Mixolydian
  Mar 23 at 14:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?
  
  – David K
  Mar 23 at 19:58
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 10 more comments

8

EDIT

I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.

---

It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.

We can correctly say:

When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.

When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.

This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.

In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".

---

Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:

Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:

There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.

The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.

There are over a hundred staff in the company.

He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

---

Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.

[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 23 at 14:01

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:36
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:46
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.
  
  – Michael Harvey
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.
  
  – Mixolydian
  Mar 23 at 14:21
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?
  
  – David K
  Mar 23 at 19:58
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 10 more comments

EDIT

I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.

---

It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.

We can correctly say:

When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.

When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.

This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.

In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".

---

Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:

Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:

There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.

The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.

There are over a hundred staff in the company.

He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

---

Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.

[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 23 at 14:01

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

share|improve this answer

edited Mar 23 at 14:01

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

answered Mar 23 at 12:00

chasly from UKchasly from UK

2,989314

7

In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.

The staff in this shop are very helpful.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 12:38
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A staff of ten.
  
  – Kshitij Singh
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 13:35
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

7

In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.

The staff in this shop are very helpful.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 12:38
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  A staff of ten.
  
  – Kshitij Singh
  Mar 23 at 12:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.
  
  – chasly from UK
  Mar 23 at 13:35
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.

The staff in this shop are very helpful.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

answered Mar 23 at 12:04

Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

1,854319

1

In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").

It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

add a comment | 

1

In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").

It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

add a comment | 

In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").

It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

share|improve this answer

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116

answered Mar 23 at 17:16

user45266user45266

1,433116