Rank ANCOVA is a bad idea?Robust ANCOVA literatureWhen would least squares be a bad idea?Is skewness always...

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

Some numbers are more equivalent than others

List of people who lose a child in תנ"ך

Reply 'no position' while the job posting is still there

Flux received by a negative charge

A Permanent Norse Presence in America

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Remove Expired Scratch Orgs From VSCode

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

Do the concepts of IP address and network interface not belong to the same layer?

Bob has never been a M before

Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Can someone explain how this makes sense electrically?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

Greatest common substring

Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

What's the difference between 違法 and 不法?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th Century

Gibbs free energy in standard state vs. equilibrium

Translation of Scottish 16th century church stained glass

What major Native American tribes were around Santa Fe during the late 1850s?



Rank ANCOVA is a bad idea?


Robust ANCOVA literatureWhen would least squares be a bad idea?Is skewness always bad?How to choose between t-test or non-parametric test e.g. Wilcoxon in small samplesRank deficient bootstrap resamplesWilcoxon signed-rank testUnderlying Idea behing Non Parametric TestSurvival analysis with multiple factorsWhat non parametric test? multiple dependent variables, between subject variable, and a within subject variableAlgebraic Manipulations in Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Test Statistics













3












$begingroup$


I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.



I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.



My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.



    I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.



    My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.



      I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.



      My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am currently working on a project looking at the best way to handle missing data (such as quality of life) due to death. One approach is to use categories/ranks for the outcome, where death is the worst category. One approach that my colleagues wish to consider is rank ANCOVA. However I am pleased to say that they also wish to consider proportional odds models and continuation ratio models.



      I found an R help page that says “This [rank ANCOVA] has been shown to yield unreliable analyses. Use the more formal proportional odds ordinal logistic model. This is a generalization of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Kruskal-Wallis statistic. This is implemented in the rms package and elsewhere”.



      My question is this: Could anyone tell me where this has been shown? In particular the part about rank ancova being unreliable?







      regression nonparametric






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 14 at 9:48









      Dan JacksonDan Jackson

      161




      161






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
          https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents



          Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397462%2frank-ancova-is-a-bad-idea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
            https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents



            Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              4












              $begingroup$

              This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
              https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents



              Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                4












                4








                4





                $begingroup$

                This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
                https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents



                Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                This paper may be a good one demonstrating problems with rank transform anova: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476644
                https://www.jstor.org/stable/2291530?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents



                Just transforming data with ranks and using ordinary regression/anova/ancova, in cases other than the k-sample problem, i.e., attempting to use this when adjusting for covariates or assessing interactions, is not fully based on good statistical principles, and results are hard to interpret.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 14 at 11:23









                Frank HarrellFrank Harrell

                55.6k3108244




                55.6k3108244






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397462%2frank-ancova-is-a-bad-idea%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    六本木駅

                    Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

                    Joseph Lister